BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Transient optical nerve stimulation is a promising new non-contact, spatially precise, artifact-free neural excitation technique useful in research and clinical settings. This study evaluates safety of this pulsed infrared laser technique by histopathologic examination of stimulated peripheral nerves. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: Exposed rat sciatic nerves were functionally stimulated with the pulsed Holmium:YAG laser, previously validated as an effective tool for optical stimulation. Nerves were removed immediately and up to 2 weeks after stimulation and assessed histologically for thermal damage. Laser parameters studied include upper limits for radiant exposure, repetition rate, and duration of stimulation. RESULTS: Radiant exposures with <1% probability of thermal tissue damage (0.66-0.70 J/cm(2)) are significantly greater than radiant exposures required for reliable stimulation (0.34-0.48 J/cm(2)). The upper limit for safe laser stimulation repetition rate occurs near 5 Hz. Maximum duration for constant low repetition rate stimulation (2 Hz) is approximately 4 minutes with adequate tissue hydration. CONCLUSION: Results confirm that optical stimulation has the potential to become a powerful non-contact clinical and research tool for brief nerve stimulation with low risk of nerve thermal damage. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Transient optical nerve stimulation is a promising new non-contact, spatially precise, artifact-free neural excitation technique useful in research and clinical settings. This study evaluates safety of this pulsed infrared laser technique by histopathologic examination of stimulated peripheral nerves. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: Exposed rat sciatic nerves were functionally stimulated with the pulsed Holmium:YAG laser, previously validated as an effective tool for optical stimulation. Nerves were removed immediately and up to 2 weeks after stimulation and assessed histologically for thermal damage. Laser parameters studied include upper limits for radiant exposure, repetition rate, and duration of stimulation. RESULTS: Radiant exposures with <1% probability of thermal tissue damage (0.66-0.70 J/cm(2)) are significantly greater than radiant exposures required for reliable stimulation (0.34-0.48 J/cm(2)). The upper limit for safe laser stimulation repetition rate occurs near 5 Hz. Maximum duration for constant low repetition rate stimulation (2 Hz) is approximately 4 minutes with adequate tissue hydration. CONCLUSION: Results confirm that optical stimulation has the potential to become a powerful non-contact clinical and research tool for brief nerve stimulation with low risk of nerve thermal damage. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Jonathan M Cayce; Robert M Friedman; Gang Chen; E Duco Jansen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Anna W Roe Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Austin R Duke; Jonathan M Cayce; Jonathan D Malphrus; Peter Konrad; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; E Duco Jansen Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Jonathan M Cayce; Jonathon D Wells; Jonathan D Malphrus; Chris Kao; Sharon Thomsen; Noel B Tulipan; Peter E Konrad; E Duco Jansen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Journal: Neurophotonics Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 3.593