Literature DB >> 24310164

Measuring sense of presence and user characteristics to predict effective training in an online simulated virtual environment.

Gianluca De Leo1, Leigh A Diggs, Elena Radici, Thomas W Mastaglio.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Virtual-reality solutions have successfully been used to train distributed teams. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between user characteristics and sense of presence in an online virtual-reality environment where distributed teams are trained. A greater sense of presence has the potential to make training in the virtual environment more effective, leading to the formation of teams that perform better in a real environment. Being able to identify, before starting online training, those user characteristics that are predictors of a greater sense of presence can lead to the selection of trainees who would benefit most from the online simulated training.
METHODS: This is an observational study with a retrospective postsurvey of participants' user characteristics and degree of sense of presence. Twenty-nine members from 3 Air Force National Guard Medical Service expeditionary medical support teams participated in an online virtual environment training exercise and completed the Independent Television Commission-Sense of Presence Inventory survey, which measures sense of presence and user characteristics. Nonparametric statistics were applied to determine the statistical significance of user characteristics to sense of presence.
RESULTS: Comparing user characteristics to the 4 scales of the Independent Television Commission-Sense of Presence Inventory using Kendall τ test gave the following results: the user characteristics "how often you play video games" (τ(26)=-0.458, P<0.01) and "television/film production knowledge" (τ(27)=-0.516, P<0.01) were significantly related to negative effects. Negative effects refer to adverse physiologic reactions owing to the virtual environment experience such as dizziness, nausea, headache, and eyestrain. The user characteristic "knowledge of virtual reality" was significantly related to engagement (τ(26)=0.463, P<0.01) and negative effects (τ(26)=-0.404, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who have knowledge about virtual environments and experience with gaming environments report a higher sense of presence that indicates that they will likely benefit more from online virtual training. Future research studies could include a larger population of expeditionary medical support, and the results obtained could be used to create a model that predicts the level of presence based on the user characteristics. To maximize results and minimize costs, only those individuals who, based on their characteristics, are supposed to have a higher sense of presence and less negative effects could be selected for online simulated virtual environment training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24310164     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182a99dd9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  9 in total

1.  Identifying Opportunities for Virtual Reality Simulation in Surgical Education: A Review of the Proceedings from the Innovation, Design, and Emerging Alliances in Surgery (IDEAS) Conference: VR Surgery.

Authors:  Jaisa Olasky; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Neal E Seymour; J Harvey Magee; Andinet Enquobahrie; Ming C Lin; Rajesh Aggarwal; L Michael Brunt; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao; Suvranu De; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 2.  Promising technological innovations in cognitive training to treat eating-related behavior.

Authors:  Evan M Forman; Stephanie P Goldstein; Daniel Flack; Brittney C Evans; Stephanie M Manasse; Cara Dochat
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Applicability of an immersive virtual reality system for assessing route learning in older adults.

Authors:  Michelle Didone Dos Santos; Juliana Magalhães da Silva; Raquel Quimas Molina da Costa; Larissa Alamino Pereira de Viveiro; Emerson Galves Moretto; Roseli de Deus Lopes; Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki; José Eduardo Pompeu
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 4.  The use of virtual reality in craving assessment and cue-exposure therapy in substance use disorders.

Authors:  Antoine Hone-Blanchet; Tobias Wensing; Shirley Fecteau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  A preliminary study of a novel emergency department nursing triage simulation for research applications.

Authors:  Steven L Dubovsky; Daniel Antonius; David G Ellis; Werner Ceusters; Robert C Sugarman; Renee Roberts; Sevie Kandifer; James Phillips; Elsa C Daurignac; Kenneth E Leonard; Lisa D Butler; Jessica P Castner; G Richard Braen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-01-03

6.  Impact of Simulator-Based Crisis Resource Management Training on Collective Orientation in Anaesthesia: Pre-Post Survey Study With Interprofessional Anaesthesia Teams.

Authors:  Markus Flentje; Hendrik Eismann; Lion Sieg; Vera Hagemann; Lars Friedrich
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2020-06-22

7.  Development and Evaluation of a Virtual Research Environment to Improve Quality of Care in Overcrowded Emergency Departments: Observational Study.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Houze-Cerfon; Christine Vaissié; Laurent Gout; Bruno Bastiani; Sandrine Charpentier; Dominique Lauque
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.143

8.  Estimating the sensorimotor components of cybersickness.

Authors:  Séamas Weech; Jessy Parokaran Varghese; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The Effect of Gamification through a Virtual Reality on Preoperative Anxiety in Pediatric Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jung-Hee Ryu; Jin-Woo Park; Francis Sahngun Nahm; Young-Tae Jeon; Ah-Young Oh; Hak Jong Lee; Jin-Hee Kim; Sung-Hee Han
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.