OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of radiotherapy on the dentin bond strength of teeth extracted from patients who had undergone head and neck radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 samples were divided into two experimental groups: group I (control group, n = 18) and group II (in vivo irradiated group, n = 18). Groups I and II were further separated into three subgroups (six specimens per subgroup), which were further assigned to the three adhesive system protocols employed: Single Bond 2 (SB) (3M ESPE), Easy Bond (EB) (3M ESPE) and Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) (Kuraray). The adhesive systems were applied to the prepared surface according to the manufacturers' instructions and restored using composite resin (Filtek Supreme, 3M ESPE). After 24 h in deionised water (37(o)C), teeth were horizontally and vertically cut to obtain beam specimens with a cross-section area of 0.8 ± 1.0 mm(2). Specimens were tested in tension using a universal testing machine at a cross-speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture patterns were observed under SEM. Data was analysed by two-way analysis of variance (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the irradiated (R/SB = 44.66 ± 10.12 MPa; R/EB = 41.48 ± 12.71 MPa; and R/CSE = 46.01 ± 6.98 MPa) and control group (C/SB = 39.12 ± 9.51 MPa; C/EB = 42.40 ± 6.66 MPa; and C/CSE = 36.58 ± 7.06 MPa) for any of the adhesive systems. All groups presented a predominance of mixed fracture modes. CONCLUSION: Head and neck radiotherapy did not affect dentin bond strength for the adhesive materials tested in this study.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of radiotherapy on the dentin bond strength of teeth extracted from patients who had undergone head and neck radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 samples were divided into two experimental groups: group I (control group, n = 18) and group II (in vivo irradiated group, n = 18). Groups I and II were further separated into three subgroups (six specimens per subgroup), which were further assigned to the three adhesive system protocols employed: Single Bond 2 (SB) (3M ESPE), Easy Bond (EB) (3M ESPE) and Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) (Kuraray). The adhesive systems were applied to the prepared surface according to the manufacturers' instructions and restored using composite resin (Filtek Supreme, 3M ESPE). After 24 h in deionised water (37(o)C), teeth were horizontally and vertically cut to obtain beam specimens with a cross-section area of 0.8 ± 1.0 mm(2). Specimens were tested in tension using a universal testing machine at a cross-speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture patterns were observed under SEM. Data was analysed by two-way analysis of variance (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the irradiated (R/SB = 44.66 ± 10.12 MPa; R/EB = 41.48 ± 12.71 MPa; and R/CSE = 46.01 ± 6.98 MPa) and control group (C/SB = 39.12 ± 9.51 MPa; C/EB = 42.40 ± 6.66 MPa; and C/CSE = 36.58 ± 7.06 MPa) for any of the adhesive systems. All groups presented a predominance of mixed fracture modes. CONCLUSION: Head and neck radiotherapy did not affect dentin bond strength for the adhesive materials tested in this study.
Authors: Lucas Z Naves; Veridiana R Novais; Steven R Armstrong; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Carlos J Soares Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mariana de Pauli Paglioni; Natalia Rangel Palmier; Ana Carolina Prado-Ribeiro; Eduardo Rodrigues Fregnani; Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião; Thaís Bianca Brandão; Marcio Ajudarte Lopes; Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro; Cesar Augusto Migliorati; Alan Roger Santos-Silva Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Velo; Ana Laura Herrera Farha; Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos; Aymée Shiota; Simone Zuquerato Sansavino; Ana Tarsila Souza; Heitor Marques Honório; Linda Wang Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Jullyana Mayara P Dezanetti; Bruna Luiza Nascimento; Juliana S R Orsi; Evelise M Souza Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Juliana Arid; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb; Harley Francisco de Oliveira; Paulo Nelson-Filho; Fabricio Kitazono de Carvalho; Lea Assed Bezerra da Silva; Talitha de Siqueira Mellara; Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva; Juliana Jendiroba Faraoni; Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 3.603