Literature DB >> 24308616

Sensitivity and specificity of three-point compression ultrasonography performed by emergency physicians for proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.

Thomas D Crowhurst1, Robert J Dunn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to quantify the sensitivity and specificity of three-point compression ultrasonography for diagnosing proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis when performed by Australian consultant emergency physicians with limited specific training. Secondary aims included quantifying rapidity, technical adequacy, predictability of equivocal results and relationships between emergency physician experience and proficiency.
METHODS: This prospective diagnostic study enrolled a convenience sample of adult patients presenting to a major ED with suspected lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. The index test was abbreviated compression ultrasonography examining three points: common femoral, proximal great saphenous and popliteal veins. Emergency physicians received specific training. The reference test was full-leg duplex ultrasonography in the Radiology Department.
RESULTS: A total of 15 emergency physicians participated, enrolling 178 subjects. Sensitivity of the index test was 77.8% (95% confidence interval: 54.8-91.0%), specificity was 91.4% (95% confidence interval: 84.9%-95.3%) and accuracy was 89.6% (95% confidence interval: 83.1-94.2%). Median duration of the index test was 10 min 34 s (interquartile range: 6 min 31 s) and ED diagnosis occurred significantly before Radiology Department diagnosis. The only statistically significant relationship between emergency physician experience and proficiency related to rapidity, which increased from the 36th scan. Equivocal index tests occurred in 9.2% of examinations and emergency physicians predicted equivocal assessments with specificity of 86.1% (95% confidence interval: 78.8-91.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Abbreviated ultrasonography performed by emergency physicians for proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis could be valuable. However, more precise estimates for sensitivity and greater understanding of relationships between emergency physician experience and proficiency are required.
© 2013 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnosis; emergency medicine; ultrasonography; venous thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24308616     DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  10 in total

1.  Deep venous thrombosis in patients with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Magdalena Mackiewicz-Milewska; Stanisław Jung; Andrzej C Kroszczyński; Hanna Mackiewicz-Nartowicz; Zbigniew Serafin; Małgorzata Cisowska-Adamiak; Jerzy Pyskir; Iwona Szymkuć-Bukowska; Wojciech Hagner; Danuta Rość
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Joint Guideline on Venous Thromboembolism - 2022.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Lopes Albricker; Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire; Simone Nascimento Dos Santos; Monica Luiza de Alcantara; Mohamed Hassan Saleh; Armando Luis Cantisano; José Aldo Ribeiro Teodoro; Carmen Lucia Lascasas Porto; Salomon Israel do Amaral; Orlando Carlos Gloria Veloso; Ana Cláudia Gomes Pereira Petisco; Fanilda Souto Barros; Márcio Vinícius Lins de Barros; Adriano José de Souza; Marcone Lima Sobreira; Robson Barbosa de Miranda; Domingos de Moraes; Carlos Gustavo Yuji Verrastro; Alexandre Dias Mançano; Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Cristina Sebastião Matushita; Rafael Willain Lopes; Artur Martins Novaes Coutinho; Diego Bromfman Pianta; Alair Augusto Sarmet Moreira Damas Dos Santos; Bruno de Lima Naves; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Comparison between two-point and three-point compression ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Rona Zuker-Herman; Irit Ayalon Dangur; Ron Berant; Elinor Cohen Sitt; Libbi Baskin; Yossi Shaya; Shachaf Shiber
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Clinical Value of Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Ran Zhu; Xiao-Chun Ma
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2017-12-29

5.  Correlation Between D-Dimer Level and Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injuries.

Authors:  Jang Hyuk Cho; Jong Bum Kim; Dong Gyu Lee
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Comparison of 2-point and 3-point point-of-care ultrasound techniques for deep vein thrombosis at the emergency department: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ju Hyung Lee; Sun Hwa Lee; Seong Jong Yun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Diagnostic Accuracy of a Three-point Compression Ultrasonography Performed by Emergency Medicine Resident for the Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: a Prospective Diagnostic Study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Jahanian; Iraj Goli Khatir; Elham-Sadat Bani-Mostafavi; Siavash Moradi; Fatemeh Hosseini Aghamalaki
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2019-06

8.  Mistakes and Pitfalls Associated with Two-Point Compression Ultrasound for Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Tony Zitek; Jamie Baydoun; Salvador Yepez; Wesley Forred; David E Slattery
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-02

9.  Accuracy of three-point compression ultrasound for the diagnosis of proximal deep-vein thrombosis in emergency department.

Authors:  Afsaneh Dehbozorgi; Fatemeh Damghani; Razieh Sadat Mousavi-Roknabadi; Mehrdad Sharifi; Seyed Mahmoudreza Sajjadi; Seyed Rouhollah Hosseini-Marvast
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 10.  Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a systematic review of generalist performed point-of-care ultrasound in unselected populations.

Authors:  Bjarte Sorensen; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2019-11-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.