Literature DB >> 24308458

Early oral feeding after pancreatoduodenectomy enhances recovery without increasing morbidity.

Arja Gerritsen1, Roos A W Wennink, Marc G H Besselink, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Dorine S J Tseng, Elles Steenhagen, Inne H M Borel Rinkes, I Quintus Molenaar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a change in the routine feeding strategy applied after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) from nasojejunal tube (NJT) feeding to early oral feeding improved clinical outcomes.
METHODS: An observational cohort study was performed in 102 consecutive patients undergoing PD. In period 1 (n = 51, historical controls), the routine postoperative feeding strategy was NJT feeding. This was changed to a protocol of early oral feeding with on-demand NJT feeding in period 2 (n = 51, consecutive prospective cohort). The primary outcome was time to resumption of adequate oral intake.
RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of study subjects in both periods were comparable. In period 1, 98% (n = 50) of patients received NJT feeding, whereas in period 2, 53% (n = 27) of patients did so [for delayed gastric empting (DGE) (n = 20) or preoperative malnutrition (n = 7)]. The time to resumption of adequate oral intake significantly decreased from 12 days in period 1 to 9 days in period 2 (P = 0.015), and the length of hospital stay shortened from 18 days in period 1 to 13 days in period 2 (P = 0.015). Overall, there were no differences in the incidences of complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher, DGE, pancreatic fistula, postoperative haemorrhage and mortality between the two periods.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of an early oral feeding strategy after PD reduced the time to resumption of adequate oral intake and length of hospital stay without negatively impacting postoperative morbidity.
© 2013 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24308458      PMCID: PMC4105904          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  30 in total

1.  Endoscopic placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes in ICU patients.

Authors:  C P Brandt; E A Mittendorf
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Evaluation of a new technique for endoscopic nasojejunal feeding-tube placement.

Authors:  Travis F Wiggins; Mark H DeLegge
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management.

Authors:  Emilie Lermite; Daniele Sommacale; Tullio Piardi; Jean-Pierre Arnaud; Alain Sauvanet; Cornelis H C Dejong; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including organ transplantation.

Authors:  A Weimann; M Braga; L Harsanyi; A Laviano; O Ljungqvist; P Soeters; K W Jauch; M Kemen; J M Hiesmayr; T Horbach; E R Kuse; K H Vestweber
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 7.324

7.  Gastric decompression and enteral feeding through a double-lumen gastrojejunostomy tube improves outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Lloyd A Mack; Ioannis G Kaklamanos; Alan S Livingstone; Joe U Levi; Carolyn Robinson; Danny Sleeman; Dido Franceschi; Oliver F Bathe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Experience of post-pyloric feeding in seriously ill patients in clinical practice.

Authors:  J R Boulton-Jones; J Lewis; J C Jobling; K Teahon
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.324

9.  Postoperative jejunal feeding and outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hani Baradi; R Matthew Walsh; J Michael Henderson; David Vogt; Marc Popovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Tube Feed Necrosis after Major Gastrointestinal Oncologic Surgery: Institutional Lessons and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  S A Sethuraman; V K Dhar; D A Habib; J E Sussman; S A Ahmad; S A Shah; B J Tsuei; J J Sussman; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery pathways in pancreatic surgery: State of the art.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Sara Nobile; Stefano Partelli; Luca Cardinali; Stefano Crippa; Gianpaolo Balzano; Luigi Beretta; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Pancreatic Fistula and Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatectomy: Where do We Stand?

Authors:  Ammar A Javed; Kanza Aziz; Fabio Bagante; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients with Low Drain Fluid Amylase.

Authors:  Robert P Sutcliffe; Majd Hamoui; John Isaac; Ravi Marudanayagam; Darius F Mirza; Paolo Muiesan; John K Roberts
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Early Nasojejunal Nutrition Versus Early Oral Feeding in Patients After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Xinchun Liu; Qiuyang Chen; Yue Fu; Zipeng Lu; Jianmin Chen; Feng Guo; Qiang Li; Junli Wu; Wentao Gao; Kuirong Jiang; Cuncai Dai; Yi Miao; Jishu Wei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Nutritional and Metabolic Derangements in Pancreatic Cancer and Pancreatic Resection.

Authors:  Taylor M Gilliland; Nicole Villafane-Ferriol; Kevin P Shah; Rohan M Shah; Hop S Tran Cao; Nader N Massarweh; Eric J Silberfein; Eugene A Choi; Cary Hsu; Amy L McElhany; Omar Barakat; William Fisher; George Van Buren
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Level of ERAS understanding affects practitioners' practice and perception of early postoperative resumption of oral intake: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Huizhen Huang; Yuelun Zhang; Le Shen; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Outcome after implementation of a clinical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low volume centre.

Authors:  Thomas Zacharias; Dan Sebastien; Ferreira Nelio
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2022-06-20

9.  Anaesthesia techniques and advanced monitoring in CANVAS patients - Implications for postoperative morbidity and patient recovery: A case report.

Authors:  Laurence Weinberg; Akshay Hungenahally; Joshua Meyerov; Lachlan Fraser Miles; Daniel Robert Anthony Cox; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-29

Review 10.  The Current Treatment Paradigm for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Barriers to Therapeutic Efficacy.

Authors:  Daniel R Principe; Patrick W Underwood; Murray Korc; Jose G Trevino; Hidayatullah G Munshi; Ajay Rana
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.