BACKGROUND: Renal artery stent revascularization is commonly used for renovascular hypertension. Clinical predictors associated with blood pressure (BP) improvement after renal artery stent revascularization are not well understood. METHODS: Patient-level data from 901 patients in five prospective multicenter Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption studies of renal artery stent revascularization was pooled. BP response was defined as reduction of systolic BP (SBP) by >10 mm Hg. Stent patency was defined within each study. Associations of BP reduction were determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 901 patients, complete outcome information was available in 527. Of these, 212/527 (40%) were male, mean age was 63 ± 13 years, 196/544 (36%) were diabetic and 504/527 (96%) had a SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg at baseline. Compared to baseline, 9-month systolic (164 ± 21 mm Hg vs. 146 ± 22 mm Hg, P < 0.0001) and diastolic (79 ± 13 mm Hg vs. 76 ± 12 mm Hg, P < 0.0001) BP declined significantly. Nine-month stent patency was 90% (305/339). In a univariate analysis, baseline SBP >150 mm Hg (OR = 4.09, CI = 2.74-6.12, P < 0.0001) was positively associated with BP response following renal artery stent revascularization. In a multivariable analysis, baseline SBP remained associated with a positive BP response (OR = 1.76, CI = 1.53-2.03, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest pooled dataset of patients treated with renal artery stent revascularization, SBP and DBP were significantly lower at 9-months. Elevated baseline SBP (>150 mm Hg) was strongly associated with BP reduction after the procedure.
BACKGROUND: Renal artery stent revascularization is commonly used for renovascular hypertension. Clinical predictors associated with blood pressure (BP) improvement after renal artery stent revascularization are not well understood. METHODS:Patient-level data from 901 patients in five prospective multicenter Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption studies of renal artery stent revascularization was pooled. BP response was defined as reduction of systolic BP (SBP) by >10 mm Hg. Stent patency was defined within each study. Associations of BP reduction were determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 901 patients, complete outcome information was available in 527. Of these, 212/527 (40%) were male, mean age was 63 ± 13 years, 196/544 (36%) were diabetic and 504/527 (96%) had a SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg at baseline. Compared to baseline, 9-month systolic (164 ± 21 mm Hg vs. 146 ± 22 mm Hg, P < 0.0001) and diastolic (79 ± 13 mm Hg vs. 76 ± 12 mm Hg, P < 0.0001) BP declined significantly. Nine-month stent patency was 90% (305/339). In a univariate analysis, baseline SBP >150 mm Hg (OR = 4.09, CI = 2.74-6.12, P < 0.0001) was positively associated with BP response following renal artery stent revascularization. In a multivariable analysis, baseline SBP remained associated with a positive BP response (OR = 1.76, CI = 1.53-2.03, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest pooled dataset of patients treated with renal artery stent revascularization, SBP and DBP were significantly lower at 9-months. Elevated baseline SBP (>150 mm Hg) was strongly associated with BP reduction after the procedure.
Authors: Timothy P Murphy; Christopher J Cooper; Karol M Pencina; Ralph D'Agostino; Joseph Massaro; Donald E Cutlip; Kenneth Jamerson; Alan H Matsumoto; William Henrich; Joseph I Shapiro; Katherine R Tuttle; David J Cohen; Michael Steffes; Qi Gao; D Christopher Metzger; William B Abernethy; Stephen C Textor; John Briguglio; Alan T Hirsch; Sheldon Tobe; Lance D Dworkin Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Timothy P Murphy; Christopher J Cooper; Alan H Matsumoto; Donald E Cutlip; Karol M Pencina; Kenneth Jamerson; Katherine R Tuttle; Joseph I Shapiro; Ralph D'Agostino; Joseph Massaro; William Henrich; Lance D Dworkin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: George S Chrysant; Mark C Bates; Timothy M Sullivan; William B Bachinsky; Jeffrey J Popma; Lei Peng; Hend L Omran; Michael R Jaff Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2014-06-07 Impact factor: 3.738