Literature DB >> 24307348

A prospective observational study to evaluate G-CSF usage in patients with solid tumors receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in Italian clinical oncology practice.

S Barni1, V Lorusso, M Giordano, G Sogno, T Gamucci, A Santoro, R Passalacqua, V Iaffaioli, N Zilembo, M Mencoboni, M Roselli, G Pappagallo, P Pronzato.   

Abstract

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a severe dose-limiting side effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Clinical practice guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis with G-CSF in patients with an overall ≥ 20 % risk of FN. AIOM Italian guidelines recommend starting G-CSF within 24-72 h after chemotherapy; for daily G-CSF, administration should continue until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is 1 × 10(9)/L post-nadir and should not be terminated after ANC increase in the early days of administration. The aim of this study was to assess guideline adherence in oncology practice in Italy. In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, patients were enrolled at the first G-CSF use in any cycle and were followed for two subsequent cycles (or until the end of chemotherapy if less than two additional cycles). Primary objective was to explore G-CSF use in Italian clinical practice; therefore, data were collected on the G-CSF type, timing of administration, and number of doses. 512 eligible patients were enrolled (median age, 62). The most common tumor types were breast (36 %), lung (18 %), and colorectal (13 %). A total of 1,164 G-CSF cycles (daily G-CSF, 718; pegfilgrastim, 446) were observed. Daily G-CSF was administered later than 72 h after chemotherapy in 42 % of cycles, and the median [range] number of doses was four [1, 10]. Pegfilgrastim was administered later than 72 h in 8 % of cycles. G-CSF prophylaxis in Italy is frequently administered in a manner which is not supported by evidence-based guidelines. As this practice may lead to poor outcomes, educational initiatives are recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24307348     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0797-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  30 in total

1.  2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO recommendations for the applications.

Authors:  J Crawford; C Caserta; F Roila
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer.

Authors:  F A Holmes; J A O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; S E Jones; J Shogan; M Savin; J Glaspy; M Moore; L Meza; I Wiznitzer; T A Neumann; L R Hill; B C Liang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network on the use of myeloid growth factors with cancer chemotherapy: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  F A Holmes; S E Jones; J O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; T George; M Savin; D Richards; J Glaspy; L Meza; G Cohen; M Dhami; D R Budman; J Hackett; M Brassard; B B Yang; B C Liang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor reduces the infectious complications of cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  V Trillet-Lenoir; J Green; C Manegold; J Von Pawel; U Gatzemeier; B Lebeau; A Depierre; P Johnson; G Decoster; D Tomita
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Serum pegfilgrastim concentrations during recovery of absolute neutrophil count in patients with cancer receiving pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Anna Kido; Atsuko Shibata
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.705

9.  Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices.

Authors:  Vicki A Morrison; Mitchell Wong; Dawn Hershman; Luis T Campos; Beiying Ding; Jennifer Malin
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2007-05

10.  Pegfilgrastim +/- ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer. Results from the GEPARTRIO study.

Authors:  G von Minckwitz; S Kümmel; A du Bois; W Eiermann; H Eidtmann; B Gerber; J Hilfrich; J Huober; S D Costa; C Jackisch; S-T Grasshoff; S Vescia; T Skacel; S Loibl; K M Mehta; M Kaufmann
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  10 in total

1.  Response of an oscillatory differential delay equation to a single stimulus.

Authors:  Michael C Mackey; Marta Tyran-Kamińska; Hans-Otto Walther
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of neutrophil response to G-CSF in healthy subjects and patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Authors:  Murad Melhem; Isabelle Delor; Juan Jose Pérez-Ruixo; John Harrold; Andrew Chow; Liviawati Wu; Philippe Jacqmin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  G-CSF use in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) as observed in clinical practice in Italy.

Authors:  Umberto Vitolo; Francesco Angrili; Lucy DeCosta; Sally Wetten; Massimo Federico
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Overuse and underuse of pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Andrew R Zullo; Uvette Lou; Sarah E Cabral; Justin Huynh; Christine M Berard-Collins
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 1.809

5.  Longitudinal FDG-PET Revealed Regional Functional Heterogeneity of Bone Marrow, Site-Dependent Response to Treatment and Correlation with Hematological Parameters.

Authors:  Masashi Yagi; Jerry Froelich; Luke Arentsen; Ryan Shanley; Rahel Ghebre; Douglas Yee; Susanta Hui
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  K Blackwell; V Semiglazov; D Krasnozhon; I Davidenko; L Nelyubina; R Nakov; G Stiegler; P Singh; A Schwebig; S Kramer; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Towards Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Models of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia.

Authors:  M Craig
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-18

8.  Filgrastim prophylaxis in elderly cancer patients in the real-life setting: a French multicenter observational study, the TULIP study.

Authors:  Kamel Laribi; Delphine Badinand; Philippe Janoray; Khaled Benabed; Jean-Loup Mouysset; Elizabeth Fabre; Françoise Monchecourt; Rafik Diab
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Shuanghuang Shengbai granule cures myelosuppression and suppresses lung cancer progression: mechanism and therapeutic targets from the aspect of microRNAs.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Zhenye Xu; Lifang Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-10

10.  Biosimilar filgrastim treatment patterns and prevention of febrile neutropenia: a prospective multicentre study in France in patients with solid tumours (the ZOHé study).

Authors:  Henri Roché; Jean-Christophe Eymard; Abderraouf Radji; Alain Prevost; Rafik Diab; Michele Lamuraglia; Ravaka-Fatoma Soumoudronga; Isabelle Gasnereau; Alain Toledano
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.