Literature DB >> 24307212

Cancer patient-reported outcomes assessment using wireless touch screen tablet computers.

G J Stukenborg1, L Blackhall, J Harrison, J S Barclay, P Dillon, M A Davis, M Mallory, P Read.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of collecting patient-reported outcomes data with wireless touch screen tablet computers in the adult oncology palliative care setting.
METHODS: Patients were provided with tablet computers during scheduled clinic visits and answered online queries about their experience over the past week in the health domains of anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, instrumental social support, sleep impairment, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dyspnea, neuropathy, and spiritual values.
RESULTS: Content analysis of patient interviews indicates that wireless touch screen tablet computers are a feasible approach for collecting patient-reported outcome measures by palliative care cancer patients presenting in clinic. Most patients indicated that the questionnaire was easy to answer. However, all but one patient requested some form of assistance, and many reported difficulties attributable to a lack of familiarity with the device, interpretation of certain questions, and wireless connectivity-related issues.
CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study demonstrates that tablet computers have the potential to efficiently and reliably collect patient-reported health status measures among palliative care cancer patients presenting in clinics. The use of these devices may lead to substantial improvements by making patient-reported outcomes available for clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24307212     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0595-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  13 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

Review 2.  Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.

Authors:  E Murphy; R Dingwall; D Greatbatch; S Parker; P Watson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Supporting clinical practice decisions with real-time patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.

Authors:  David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: a longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication.

Authors:  Elena E Takeuchi; Ada Keding; Noha Awad; Ursula Hofmann; Lyndsay J Campbell; Peter J Selby; Julia M Brown; Galina Velikova
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center.

Authors:  Richard Gershon; Nan E Rothrock; Rachel T Hanrahan; Liz J Jansky; Mark Harniss; William Riley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy; C Daniel Mullins; Bryce B Reeve; Mary Lou Smith; Stephen Joel Coons; Jeff Sloan; Keith Wenzel; Cynthia Chauhan; Wayland Eppard; Elizabeth S Frank; Joseph Lipscomb; Stephen A Raymond; Merianne Spencer; Sean Tunis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Roxanne E Jensen; Jodi B Segal; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Richard A Berzon; Dennis A Revicki; William R Lenderking; Carol M Moinpour; Ethan Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Daniel Costa; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Holly Rice; Liam Gabb; Madeleine King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Using patients' own knowledge of early sensations and symptoms to develop an interactive, individualized e-questionnaire to facilitate early diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Levitsky; Britt-Marie Bernhardson; Carol Tishelman; Lars E Eriksson; Ingela Henoch; Maria Olin; Karl Kölbeck; Nadja Rystedt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home.

Authors:  L M Wintner; J M Giesinger; A Zabernigg; G Rumpold; M Sztankay; A S Oberguggenberger; E M Gamper; B Holzner
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Acupressure to Reduce Treatment-Related Symptoms for Children With Cancer and Recipients of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  E Anne Lown; Anu Banerjee; Eric Vittinghoff; Christopher C Dvorak; Wendy Hartogensis; Alexis Melton; Christina Mangurian; Hiroe Hu; Deborah Shear; Robyn Adcock; Michael Morgan; Carla Golden; Frederick M Hecht
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2019-08-14

5.  Liver transplant candidates have impaired quality of life across health domains as assessed by computerized testing.

Authors:  Jonathan G Stine; George J Stukenborg; Jennifer Wang; Alden Adkins; Blake Niccum; Alex Zimmet; Curtis K Argo
Journal:  Ann Hepatol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.400

Review 6.  Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Letteria Consolo; Greta Castellini; Silvia Cilluffo; Ilaria Basile; Maura Lusignani
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-23

7.  Integrating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Routine Cancer Care: Cancer Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Acceptability and Value.

Authors:  Angela Stover; Debra E Irwin; Ronald C Chen; Bhishamjit S Chera; Deborah K Mayer; Hyman B Muss; Donald L Rosenstein; Thomas C Shea; William A Wood; Jessica C Lyons; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2015-10-29

8.  A pilot study of patient-centered outcome assessment using PROMIS for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Traci L Hedrick; Amy M Harrigan; Robert H Thiele; Charles M Friel; Benjamin D Kozower; George J Stukenborg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Case Studies from the Clinic: Initiating and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Tracie Locklear; Lynn L DeBar; James Willig; Sean Rundell; Leslie Blackhall; Douglas Zatzick; Karen Staman; Nrupen Bhavsar; Kevin Weinfurt; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-06-12

10.  Longitudinal patterns of cancer patient reported outcomes in end of life care predict survival.

Authors:  George J Stukenborg; Leslie J Blackhall; James H Harrison; Patrick M Dillon; Paul W Read
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.