Literature DB >> 24306557

Quantile lower bounds to reliability based on locally optimal splits.

Tyler D Hunt1, Peter M Bentler.   

Abstract

Extending the theory of lower bounds to reliability based on splits given by Guttman (in Psychometrika 53, 63-70, 1945), this paper introduces quantile lower bound coefficients λ 4(Q) that refer to cumulative proportions of potential locally optimal "split-half" coefficients that are below a particular point Q in the distribution of split-halves based on different partitions of variables into two sets. Interesting quantile values are Q=0.05,0.50,0.95,1.00 with λ 4(0.05)≤λ 4(0.50)≤λ 4(0.95)≤λ 4(1.0). Only the global optimum λ 4(1.0), Guttman's maximal λ 4, has previously been considered to be interesting, but in small samples it substantially overestimates population reliability ρ. The three coefficients λ 4(0.05), λ 4(0.50), and λ 4(0.95) provide new lower bounds to reliability. The smallest, λ 4(0.05), provides the most protection against capitalizing on chance associations, and thus overestimation, λ 4(0.50) is the median of these coefficients, while λ 4(0.95) tends to overestimate reliability, but also exhibits less bias than previous estimators. Computational theory, algorithm, and publicly available code based in R are provided to compute these coefficients. Simulation studies evaluate the performance of these coefficients and compare them to coefficient alpha and the greatest lower bound under several population reliability structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24306557      PMCID: PMC4047206          DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9393-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  6 in total

1.  Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients.

Authors:  H G Osburn
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-09

2.  A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.

Authors:  L GUTTMAN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1945       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Analytic Estimation of Standard Error and Confidence Interval for Scale Reliability.

Authors:  Tenko Raykov
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements.

Authors:  M R Novick; C Lewis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  A statistical lower bound to population reliability.

Authors:  J A Woodward; P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.500

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Covariate-free and Covariate-dependent Reliability.

Authors:  Peter M Bentler
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Testing the Difference Between Reliability Coefficients Alpha and Omega.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; Wai Chan
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Neither Cronbach's Alpha nor McDonald's Omega: A Commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt.

Authors:  Eunseong Cho
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Alpha, FACTT, and Beyond.

Authors:  Peter M Bentler
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements.

Authors:  Italo Trizano-Hermosilla; Jesús M Alvarado
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-26

6.  Extracting Agency and Communion From the Big Five: A Four-Way Competition.

Authors:  Theresa M Entringer; Jochen E Gebauer; Delroy L Paulhus
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2021-04-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.