BACKGROUND: To elucidate the biological effects of blocking fluorescent light on the retina using specific blocking materials. METHODS: Seven- to 8-week-old BALB/c mice were divided into three groups and placed in one of the three boxes: one blocked ultraviolet and violet wavelengths of light (violet blockade), one blocked ultraviolet, violet, blue and some other visible wavelengths (blue-plus blockade), and one allowed most visible light to pass through (control). They were then exposed to a white fluorescent lamp for 1 h at 5.65E-05 mW/cm(2) /s. After treatment, the electroretinogram, retinal outer nuclear layer thickness and retinal outer segment length were measured. In addition, retinal apoptotic cells were quantified by TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling assay and c-Fos messenger RNA, and protein levels were measured by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunoblot analyses, respectively. RESULTS: The blue-plus blockade group retained a significantly better electroretinogram response following light exposure than the control or violet blockade groups. The blue-plus blockade group also exhibited greater outer nuclear layer thickness and greater outer-segment length, and fewer apoptotic cells after light exposure than the other groups. The c-Fos messenger RNA and protein levels were substantially reduced in the blue-plus blockade group and reduced to a lesser extent in the violet blockade group. CONCLUSIONS: The blockade of blue plus additional visible wavelengths of light was most effective in protecting the retina from light-induced damage. The blockade of violet light alone was also effective in reducing intracellular molecular responses, but these effects were not sufficient for attenuating retinal degeneration.
BACKGROUND: To elucidate the biological effects of blocking fluorescent light on the retina using specific blocking materials. METHODS: Seven- to 8-week-old BALB/c mice were divided into three groups and placed in one of the three boxes: one blocked ultraviolet and violet wavelengths of light (violet blockade), one blocked ultraviolet, violet, blue and some other visible wavelengths (blue-plus blockade), and one allowed most visible light to pass through (control). They were then exposed to a white fluorescent lamp for 1 h at 5.65E-05 mW/cm(2) /s. After treatment, the electroretinogram, retinal outer nuclear layer thickness and retinal outer segment length were measured. In addition, retinal apoptotic cells were quantified by TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling assay and c-Fos messenger RNA, and protein levels were measured by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunoblot analyses, respectively. RESULTS: The blue-plus blockade group retained a significantly better electroretinogram response following light exposure than the control or violet blockade groups. The blue-plus blockade group also exhibited greater outer nuclear layer thickness and greater outer-segment length, and fewer apoptotic cells after light exposure than the other groups. The c-Fos messenger RNA and protein levels were substantially reduced in the blue-plus blockade group and reduced to a lesser extent in the violet blockade group. CONCLUSIONS: The blockade of blue plus additional visible wavelengths of light was most effective in protecting the retina from light-induced damage. The blockade of violet light alone was also effective in reducing intracellular molecular responses, but these effects were not sufficient for attenuating retinal degeneration.
Authors: Hyeji Park; Kwangsik Jang; Yesol Jo; Kyung Mi Shim; Chunsik Bae; Seong Soo Kang; Se Eun Kim Journal: In Vivo Date: 2022 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Megumi Hatori; Claude Gronfier; Russell N Van Gelder; Paul S Bernstein; Josep Carreras; Satchidananda Panda; Frederick Marks; David Sliney; Charles E Hunt; Tsuyoshi Hirota; Toshiharu Furukawa; Kazuo Tsubota Journal: NPJ Aging Mech Dis Date: 2017-06-16
Authors: Javier Vicente-Tejedor; Miguel Marchena; Laura Ramírez; Diego García-Ayuso; Violeta Gómez-Vicente; Celia Sánchez-Ramos; Pedro de la Villa; Francisco Germain Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 3.240