In clinical settings, biopsies are routinely used to determine cancer type and grade based on tumor cell morphology, as determined via histochemical or immunohistochemical staining. Unfortunately, in a significant number of cases, traditional biopsy results are either inconclusive or do not provide full subtype differentiation, possibly leading to inefficient or ineffective treatment. Glycomic profiling of the cell membrane offers an alternate route toward cancer diagnosis. In this study, isomer-sensitive nano-LC/MS was used to directly obtain detailed profiles of the different N-glycan structures present on cancer cell membranes. Membrane N-glycans were extracted from cells representing various subtypes of breast, lung, cervical, ovarian, and lymphatic cancer. Chip-based porous graphitized carbon nano-LC/MS was used to separate, identify, and quantify the native N-glycans. Structure-sensitive N-glycan profiling identified hundreds of glycan peaks per cell line, including multiple isomers for most compositions. Hierarchical clusterings based on Pearson correlation coefficients were used to quickly compare and separate each cell line according to originating organ and disease subtype. Based simply on the relative abundances of broad glycan classes (e.g., high mannose, complex/hybrid fucosylated, complex/hybrid sialylated, etc.), most cell lines were readily differentiated. More closely related cell lines were differentiated based on several-fold differences in the abundances of individual glycans. Based on characteristic N-glycan profiles, primary cancer origins and molecular subtypes could be distinguished. These results demonstrate that stark differences in cancer cell membrane glycosylation can be exploited to create an MS-based biopsy, with potential applications toward cancer diagnosis and direction of treatment.
In clinical settings, biopsies are routinely used to determine cancer type and grade based onn class="Disease">tumor cell morphology, as determined via histochemical or immunohistochemical staining. Unfortunately, in a significant number of cases, traditional biopsy results are either inconclusive or do not provide full subtype differentiation, possibly leading to inefficient or ineffective treatment. Glycomic profiling of the cell membrane offers an alternate route toward cancer diagnosis. In this study, isomer-sensitive nano-LC/MS was used to directly obtain detailed profiles of the different N-glycan structures present on cancer cell membranes. Membrane N-glycans were extracted from cells representing various subtypes of breast, lung, cervical, ovarian, and lymphatic cancer. Chip-based porous graphitized carbon nano-LC/MS was used to separate, identify, and quantify the native N-glycans. Structure-sensitive N-glycan profiling identified hundreds of glycan peaks per cell line, including multiple isomers for most compositions. Hierarchical clusterings based on Pearson correlation coefficients were used to quickly compare and separate each cell line according to originating organ and disease subtype. Based simply on the relative abundances of broad glycan classes (e.g., high mannose, complex/hybrid fucosylated, complex/hybrid sialylated, etc.), most cell lines were readily differentiated. More closely related cell lines were differentiated based on several-fold differences in the abundances of individual glycans. Based on characteristic N-glycan profiles, primary cancer origins and molecular subtypes could be distinguished. These results demonstrate that stark differences in cancer cell membrane glycosylation can be exploited to create an MS-based biopsy, with potential applications toward cancer diagnosis and direction of treatment.
Authors: S Nakamori; M Kameyama; S Imaoka; H Furukawa; O Ishikawa; Y Sasaki; T Kabuto; T Iwanaga; Y Matsushita; T Irimura Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1993-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Norelle C Wildburger; Shiyue Zhou; Lauren G Zacharias; Roger A Kroes; Joseph R Moskal; Mary Schmidt; Parvin Mirzaei; Joy Gumin; Frederick F Lang; Yehia Mechref; Carol L Nilsson Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Kai-Yuan Chiu; Qi Wang; Harsha P Gunawardena; Michael Held; Ahmed Faik; Hao Chen Journal: Int J Mass Spectrom Date: 2021-08-28 Impact factor: 1.986
Authors: Jae-Han Kim; Sung Hyeon Lee; Sookyung Choi; Unyong Kim; In Seok Yeo; Su Hee Kim; Myung Jin Oh; Hantae Moon; Jua Lee; Seunghyup Jeong; Min Gew Choi; Jun Ho Lee; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Sung Kim; Yang Won Min; Hyuk Lee; Jun Haeng Lee; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Su Jin Lee; Seung Tae Kim; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Ki Kang; Hyun Joo An; Jung Hoe Kim Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-02-14
Authors: Stephanie Holst; Anna J M Deuss; Gabi W van Pelt; Sandra J van Vliet; Juan J Garcia-Vallejo; Carolien A M Koeleman; André M Deelder; Wilma E Mesker; Rob A Tollenaar; Yoann Rombouts; Manfred Wuhrer Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 5.911