| Literature DB >> 24302785 |
Birgit Wild1, Jörg Schnecker, Jiří Bárta, Petr Capek, Georg Guggenberger, Florian Hofhansl, Christina Kaiser, Nikolaj Lashchinsky, Robert Mikutta, Maria Mooshammer, Hana Santrůčková, Olga Shibistova, Tim Urich, Sergey A Zimov, Andreas Richter.
Abstract
Turbic Cryosols (permafrost soils characterized by cryoturbation, i.e., by mixing of soil layers due to freezing and thawing) are widespread across the Arctic, and contain large amounts of poorly decomposed organic material buried in the subsoil. This cryoturbated organic matter exhibits retarded decomposition compared to organic material in the topsoil. Since soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition is known to be tightly linked to N availability, we investigated N transformation rates in different soil horizons of three tundra sites in north-eastern Siberia and Greenland. We measured gross rates of protein depolymerization, N mineralization (ammonification) and nitrification, as well as microbial uptake of amino acids and NH4+ using an array of 15N pool dilution approaches. We found that all sites and horizons were characterized by low N availability, as indicated by low N mineralization compared to protein depolymerization rates (with gross N mineralization accounting on average for 14% of gross protein depolymerization). The proportion of organic N mineralized was significantly higher at the Greenland than at the Siberian sites, suggesting differences in N limitation. The proportion of organic N mineralized, however, did not differ significantly between soil horizons, pointing to a similar N demand of the microbial community of each horizon. In contrast, absolute N transformation rates were significantly lower in cryoturbated than in organic horizons, with cryoturbated horizons reaching not more than 32% of the transformation rates in organic horizons. Our results thus indicate a deceleration of the entire N cycle in cryoturbated soil horizons, especially strongly reduced rates of protein depolymerization (16% of organic horizons) which is considered the rate-limiting step in soil N cycling.Entities:
Keywords: Arctic; Cryoturbation; Ecological stoichiometry; Nitrification; Nitrogen availability; Nitrogen mineralization; Nitrogen transformation; Protein depolymerization; Soil organic matter; Tundra
Year: 2013 PMID: 24302785 PMCID: PMC3819518 DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soil Biol Biochem ISSN: 0038-0717 Impact factor: 7.609
C, N and P content, C/N and N/P ratios (mass ratios), and pH values of organic, cryoturbated (cryot.) and mineral horizons of heath tundra (Greenland), tussock tundra (Siberia) and shrub tundra (Siberia). Values represent means (±standard error).
| Site | Horizon | C (%) | N (%) | P (%) | C/N | N/P | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heath | Organic | 15.76 (0.86) | 0.93 (0.06) | 0.102 (0.006) | 17.14 (1.95) | 9.18 (0.39) | 5.29 (0.10) |
| Cryot. | 9.35 (0.95) | 0.65 (0.00) | 0.112 (0.007) | 14.46 (1.46) | 5.82 (0.37) | 6.02 (0.02) | |
| Mineral | 3.94 (1.01) | 0.29 (0.08) | 0.074 (0.025) | 13.81 (0.61) | 4.86 (1.57) | 6.16 (0.11) | |
| Tussock | Organic | 22.15 (1.57) | 1.00 (0.05) | 0.155 (0.019) | 22.38 (2.18) | 6.68 (1.09) | 5.13 (0.05) |
| Cryot. | 15.30 (4.84) | 0.81 (0.18) | 0.112 (0.011) | 18.23 (1.76) | 7.36 (1.81) | 5.57 (0.28) | |
| Mineral | 2.08 (0.40) | 0.14 (0.02) | 0.046 (0.039) | 14.33 (0.40) | 9.40 (7.42) | 5.50 (0.02) | |
| Shrub | Organic | 26.63 (5.98) | 0.96 (0.18) | 0.115 (0.005) | 27.46 (1.61) | 8.36 (1.57) | 4.64 (0.23) |
| Cryot. | 9.69 (2.57) | 0.64 (0.20) | 0.121 (0.084) | 15.46 (0.88) | 8.01 (3.90) | 5.80 (0.29) | |
| Mineral | 2.50 (0.85) | 0.16 (0.03) | 0.061 (0.022) | 14.66 (2.96) | 4.55 (2.66) | 5.54 (0.19) |
Significance of differences between sites (heath tundra, Greenland; tussock tundra, Siberia; shrub tundra, Siberia) or between horizons (organic; cryoturbated; mineral), derived from two-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD test, or Kruskal–Wallis tests with Mann–Whitney U tests as post-hoc. Different letters indicate p < 0.05, with “a” denoting the highest values.
| Parameter | Unit | Between sites | Between horizons | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sign. | Heath | Tussock | Shrub | Sign. | Organic | Cryot. | Mineral | ||
| C | % | n.s. | *** | a | b | c | |||
| N | % | n.s. | *** | a | a | b | |||
| P | % | n.s. | * | a | ab | b | |||
| C/N | g C g−1 N | n.s. | *** | a | b | b | |||
| N/P | g N g−1 P | n.s. | n.s. | ||||||
| pH | ** | a | b | b | *** | b | a | a | |
| Total PLFAs | μmol g−1 DW | n.s. | *** | a | b | c | |||
| TDN | μg N g−1 DW | n.s. | *** | a | b | b | |||
| DON | μg N g−1 DW | n.s. | ** | a | b | b | |||
| NH4+ | μg N g−1 DW | * | b | ab | a | * | a | ab | b |
| NO3- | μg N g−1 DW | n.s. | n.s. | ||||||
| DON | % of TDN | ** | a | a | b | n.s. | |||
| Inorganic phosphate | μg P g−1 DW | ** | b | a | a | n.s. | |||
| Gross protein depolymerization | μg N g−1 DW d−1 | n.s. | *** | a | b | b | |||
| Gross amino acid uptake | μg N g−1 DW d−1 | n.s. | *** | a | b | b | |||
| Gross N mineralization | μg N g−1 DW d−1 | *** | a | b | a | *** | a | b | b |
| Gross NH4+ uptake | μg N g−1 DW d−1 | * | ab | b | a | *** | a | a | b |
| Gross nitrification | μg N g−1 DW d−1 | n.s. | ** | a | b | b | |||
| Gross protein depolymerization | mg N g−1 N d−1 | * | b | ab | a | * | a | b | ab |
| Gross amino acid uptake | mg N g−1 N d−1 | n.s. | * | a | b | ab | |||
| Gross N mineralization | mg N g-1 N d−1 | *** | a | b | a | *** | a | b | a |
| Gross NH4+ uptake | mg N g−1 N d−1 | ** | b | b | a | n.s. | |||
| Gross nitrification | mg N g−1 N d−1 | ** | b | ab | a | * | a | b | a |
| NUE | ** | b | a | b | n.s. | ||||
| Principal Component 1 | *** | b | a | a | *** | a | b | a | |
| Principal Component 2 | * | b | a | b | n.s. | ||||
Levels of significance: ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; n.s., not significant.
Fig. 1Upper panel: Total dissolved N in soil extracts of organic (black bars), cryoturbated (gray bars) and mineral (white bars) horizons of three tundra sites. Bars are separated into DON (lowest part), NH4+ (middle part) and NO3− (upper part). Concentrations of NH4+ and DON could not be determined in the mineral horizons of the tussock tundra site. Lower Panel: Concentrations of inorganic phosphate in soil extracts of organic (black bars), cryoturbated (gray bars) and mineral (white bars) horizons of three tundra sites. All bars represent means ± standard error. Levels of significance: ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; n.s., not significant; n.a., not analyzed (two-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test).
Correlation analysis of soil C and N content (in % of DW), microbial abundances (in % of total PLFAs) and gross rates of protein depolymerization (Protein depol.), microbial amino acid uptake (AA uptake), N mineralization, microbial NH4+ uptake and nitrification, measured with a set of 15N pool dilution approaches. For correlation with soil C and N content, gross N transformation rates were expressed in μg N g−1 DW d−1. For correlation with microbial groups, and with each other, gross N transformation rates were corrected for the differences in SOM content between soil horizons and expressed in mg N g−1 N d−1. Significance of correlations and correlation coefficients were determined using Spearman's rank correlations.
| Protein depol. | AA uptake | N mineralization | NH4+ uptake | Nitrification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | +0.577** | +0.621** | +0.445* | +0.565** | +0.639** |
| N | +0.519* | +0.541** | +0.418* | +0.539** | +0.650** |
| Fungi | +0.499* | +0.540** | +0.367 | +0.176 | +0.428* |
| Gram negative | +0.368 | +0.483* | +0.304 | +0.126 | +0.528* |
| Gram positive | −0.305 | −0.396 | −0.166 | −0.092 | −0.276 |
| AA uptake | +0.792*** | ||||
| N mineralization | +0.237 | +0.264 | |||
| NH4+ uptake | +0.356 | +0.244 | +0.532** | ||
| Nitrification | +0.597** | +0.399 | +0.424* | +0.394 |
Levels of significance: ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05.
Fig. 2Gross rates of protein depolymerization, microbial amino acid uptake, N mineralization, microbial NH4+ uptake and nitrification (per g total N), of organic (black bars), cryoturbated (gray bars) and mineral (white bars) horizons of three tundra sites. Rates were measured using a set of 15N pool dilution approaches. Bars represent means ± standard error. Levels of significance: ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; n.s., not significant; n.a., not analyzed (two-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test).
Fig. 4Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of organic (black bars), cryoturbated (gray bars) and mineral (white bars) horizons of three tundra sites. NUE was calculated as the proportion of amino acid N taken up by microorganisms that was not mineralized to NH4+. Bars represent means ± standard error. Levels of significance: ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; n.s., not significant (two-way ANOVA).
Fig. 3Ordination of organic (black), cryoturbated (gray) and mineral (white) horizons of heath tundra (Greenland; triangles), tussock tundra (Siberia; circles) and shrub tundra (Siberia; squares) using Principal Component Analysis. Data include gross rates of protein depolymerization, microbial amino acid uptake, N mineralization, microbial NH4+ uptake and nitrification (per g total N to correct for differences in SOM content between horizons), as well as pH values and the relative abundances of fungi, gram positive and gram negative bacteria (in % of total PLFAs).