J Vandepapelière1, S Aydin, J-P Cosyns, G Depresseux, M Jadoul, F A Houssiau. 1. Department of Rheumatology; Department of Pathology; Department of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium; 4Pôle de Pathologies Rhumatismales; and Pôle de Néphrologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to evaluate whether the different International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classes of proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) have a distinct baseline presentation, short-term response to immunosuppression (IS) and long-term prognosis. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with new onset (first renal biopsy) ISN/RPS proliferative LN (Class III: n=24; IV-S: n=23; IV-G: n=51) were diagnosed at our institution between 1995 and 2012 (Louvain Lupus Nephritis inception Cohort). Their baseline renal parameters, primary response to IS at one year, survival and long-term renal outcome (mean follow-up: 77 months) were compared. RESULTS: At baseline, serum creatinine and 24-hour proteinuria were higher in Class IV-G, as was activity index on renal biopsy in Class IV-S and IV-G compared to III. Upon treatment, renal parameters improved with the same kinetics and to the same extent in the three pathological classes. On repeat renal biopsies (n=43), activity indices dropped similarly. Poor outcomes (death, end-stage renal disease, renal impairment defined by an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) did not statistically differ between groups, although there was a trend toward more renal impairment at follow-up in Class IV-G compared to IV-S and III. Finally, the presence of even mild chronic lesions on baseline biopsy was clearly predictive of late renal outcome. CONCLUSION: Subsetting proliferative LN into Class III, IV-S and IV-G provides less clinically discriminant prognostic information than baseline chronicity index.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to evaluate whether the different International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classes of proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) have a distinct baseline presentation, short-term response to immunosuppression (IS) and long-term prognosis. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with new onset (first renal biopsy) ISN/RPS proliferative LN (Class III: n=24; IV-S: n=23; IV-G: n=51) were diagnosed at our institution between 1995 and 2012 (Louvain Lupus Nephritis inception Cohort). Their baseline renal parameters, primary response to IS at one year, survival and long-term renal outcome (mean follow-up: 77 months) were compared. RESULTS: At baseline, serum creatinine and 24-hour proteinuria were higher in Class IV-G, as was activity index on renal biopsy in Class IV-S and IV-G compared to III. Upon treatment, renal parameters improved with the same kinetics and to the same extent in the three pathological classes. On repeat renal biopsies (n=43), activity indices dropped similarly. Poor outcomes (death, end-stage renal disease, renal impairment defined by an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) did not statistically differ between groups, although there was a trend toward more renal impairment at follow-up in Class IV-G compared to IV-S and III. Finally, the presence of even mild chronic lesions on baseline biopsy was clearly predictive of late renal outcome. CONCLUSION: Subsetting proliferative LN into Class III, IV-S and IV-G provides less clinically discriminant prognostic information than baseline chronicity index.
Authors: Paul Hoover; Evan Der; Celine C Berthier; Arnon Arazi; James A Lederer; Judith A James; Jill Buyon; Michelle Petri; H Michael Belmont; Peter Izmirly; David Wofsy; Nir Hacohen; Betty Diamond; Chaim Putterman; Anne Davidson Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 4.794