| Literature DB >> 24300296 |
Ndidi C Ngwuluka1, Jehu Kyari, John Taplong, Onyinye J Uwaezuoke.
Abstract
This study was undertaken to explore gum from Bombax buonopozense calyxes as a binding agent in formulation of immediate release dosage forms using wet granulation method. The granules were characterized to assess the flow and compression properties and when compressed, non-compendial and compendial tests were undertaken to assess the tablet properties for tablets prepared with bombax gum in comparison with those prepared with tragacanth and acacia gums. Granules prepared with bombax exhibited good flow and compressible properties with angle of repose 28.60°, Carr's compressibility of 21.30% and Hausner's quotient of 1.27. The tablets were hard, but did not disintegrate after one hour. Furthermore, only 52.5% of paracetamol was released after one hour. The drug release profile followed zero order kinetics. Tablets prepared with bombax gum have the potential to deliver drugs in a controlled manner over a prolonged period at a constant rate.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 24300296 PMCID: PMC3834922 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics4030354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Digital image of bombax gum dispersed in water.
Figure 2Viscosity as a function of shear rate for bombax gum.
Figure 3Particle size distribution of granules prepared from different binders.
Analysis of granules prepared with different binders.
| Test | Binder | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bombax gum | Acacia gum | Tragacanth gum | |
| Flow rate (g/sec) | 6.15 ± 0.05 | 9.80 ± 0.10 | 7.75 ± 0.05 |
| Angle of repose (°) | 28.60 ± 0.10 | 26.50 ± 0.15 | 25.20 ± 0.10 |
| Bulk density (g/mL) | 0.487 ± 0.01 | 0.476 ± 0.01 | 0.465 ± 0.01 |
| Tapped density (g/mL) | 0.6200 ± 0.01 | 0.6250 ± 0.005 | 0.6061 ± 0.01 |
| % compressibility | 21.30 ± 0.35 | 23.80 ± 0.36 | 23.30 ± 0.4 |
| Hausner’s quotient | 1.27 ± 0.03 | 1.31 ± 0.03 | 1.30 ± 0.03 |
Evaluation of tablets based on compendial and non-compendial tests.
| Test | Binder | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bombax gum | Acacia gum | Tragacanth gum | |
| Friability (%) | 3.10 ± 0.03 | 7.54 ± 0.03 | 9.98 ± 0.03 |
| Mean Hardness (kp) 1 | 6.3 ± 0.27 | 5.5 ± 0.20 | 5.3 ± 0.1 |
| Disintegration time (Minutes) | >60.00 | 4.00 ± 0.17 | 2.00 ± 0.1 |
| Uniformity of weight | 660 ± 0.21 | 660 ± 1.1 | 634 ± 1.8 |
| Mean Diameter (mm) | 11.20 ± 0.1 | 11.20 ± 0.1 | 11.20 ± 0.1 |
| Mean Thickness (mm) | 3.5 ± 0.05 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.06 |
| % drug release at T45 | 33.90 ± 0.63 | 88.14 ± 0.60 | 97.5 ± 0.61 |
| % drug release at T60 | 52.50 ± 0.7 | 94.0 ± 0.75 | 100.8 ± 0.8 |
1 kp iskiloponds.
Composition of granules for tablet formulation.
| Components | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Maize starch | 15% |
| Binder | 3.5% |
| Talc | 2% |
| Magnesium stearate | 0.5% |
| Paracetamol | 79% |
Figure 4Drug release profiles of tablets formulated with bombax gum, acacia gum and tragacanth gum.
Outcomes of mathematical modeling of drug release profiles.
| Binder | Zero Order | First Order | DE (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Bombax Gum | 0.9835 | 0.9673 | 0.7947 | 0.9588 | 0.9192 | −0.0049 | 44.65 |
| Acacia Gum | 0.9228 | 0.8516 | 1.3804 | 0.9923 | 0.9846 | −0.0196 | 72.48 |
| Tragacanth Gum | 0.9184 | 0.8435 | 1.4375 | 0.9803 | 0.9609 | −0.0367 | 73.95 |
Outcomes of mathematical modeling of drug release profiles.
| Binder | Higuchi | Korsmeyer-Peppas |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Bombax Gum | 0.9271 | 0.8056 | 4.983 | 0.9877 | 0.9727 | 0.471 | 1.136 |
| Acacia Gum | 0.9858 | 0.9705 | 13.154 | 0.9875 | 0.9750 | 15.824 | 0.449 |
| Tragacanth Gum | 0.9866 | 0.9678 | 14.275 | 0.9905 | 0.9811 | 19.437 | 0.415 |