Literature DB >> 24298489

Sub-Lingual Spray Versus Pearl of TNG as A Provocative Agent for Tilt Table Test.

Reza Karbasi-Afshar1, Amin Saburi, Ayat Shahmari, Arezoo Khosravi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the false positive ratio of Tilt Table Test (TTT) result by using TNG spray (Sub-lingual; SL) as compared to TNG pearl in patients referred to military service.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective study. It was conducted on 110 cases referred for military service, expressed vasovagal symptoms. We divided the subjects into three groups; first Group (60 cases) used TNG pearl for provoking syncope in TTT, Group 2 (50 cases) and Group 3 (control cases) used TNG spray in the same dose (0.4 mg).
RESULTS: In the first step of tilt study, 10%, and 8% of subjects had fainted on not using provoking drug in cases and controls, respectively. After using the drugs, 36.6%, 96% and 18% showed positive results in pearl, spray and the control groups, respectively (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Rather than pearl group, a 40 minute tilt using TNG spray showed significant higher positive results, which may be incorrectly positive. Using this form of TNG seems not useful for distinguishing and diagnosing vasovagal shocks, especially in subjects referred for military service capacity. For constant evidence, a cross-over clinical trial study is required, involving suspected cases divided into two groups, who both will be examined with spray and pearl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Military service; Syncope; TNG spray; Tilt table test

Year:  2013        PMID: 24298489      PMCID: PMC3843481          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5494.3483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  25 in total

Review 1.  The management of vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  S W Parry; R A Kenny
Journal:  QJM       Date:  1999-12

2.  Prevalence and triggers of syncope in medical students.

Authors:  Karin S Ganzeboom; Nancy Colman; Johannes B Reitsma; Win K Shen; Wouter Wieling
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Cerebral autoregulation in neurally mediated syncope: victim or executioner?

Authors:  A F Folino
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  The consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension: a revisit after 13 years.

Authors:  Wouter Wieling; Irwin J Schatz
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Breathholding spells (cyanotic and pallid infantile syncope).

Authors:  C T Lombroso; P Lerman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Effect of patient characteristics on the yield of prolonged baseline head-up tilt testing and the additional yield of drug provocation.

Authors:  A P Fitzpatrick; R J Lee; L M Epstein; M D Lesh; S Eisenberg; M M Sheinman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  What is the minimum duration of head-up tilt necessary to detect orthostatic hypotension?

Authors:  Jade A Gehrking; Stacy M Hines; Lisa M Benrud-Larson; Tonette L Opher-Gehrking; Phillip A Low
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 8.  Epidemiology of reflex syncope.

Authors:  N Colman; K Nahm; K S Ganzeboom; W K Shen; J Reitsma; M Linzer; W Wieling; H Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 9.  Postural tachycardia syndrome and reflex syncope: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Julian M Stewart
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Is there any point to vasovagal syncope?

Authors:  J Gert van Dijk; Robert Sheldon
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 5.625

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Tilt table test today - state of the art.

Authors:  Nicholay Teodorovich; Moshe Swissa
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.