Literature DB >> 2429824

The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones.

D L Woods, R Elmasian.   

Abstract

We examined the short- and long-term habituation of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by tones, complex tones and digitized speech sounds (vowels and consonant-vowel-consonant syllables). Twelve different stimuli equated in loudness and duration (300 msec) were studied. To examine short-term habituation stimuli were presented in trains of 6 with interstimulus intervals of 0.5 or 1.0 sec. The first 4 stimuli in a train were identical standards. On 50% of the trains the standard in the 5th position was replaced by a deviant probe stimulus, and on 20% of the trains the standard in the 6th position was replaced by a target, a truncated standard that required a speeded button press response. Short-term habituation (STH) was complete by the third stimulus in the train and resulted in amplitude decrements of 50-75% for the N1 component. STH was partially stimulus specific in that amplitudes were larger following deviant stimuli in the 5th position than following standards. STH of the N1 was more marked for speech sounds than for loudness-matched tones or complex tones at short ISI. In addition, standard and deviant stimuli that differed in phonetic structure showed more cross-habituation than did tones or complex tones that differed in frequency. This pattern of results suggests that STH is a function of the acoustic resemblance of successive stimuli. The long-term habituation (LTH) of the ERP was studied by comparing amplitudes across balanced 5.25 m stimulus blocks over the course of the experiment. Two types of LTH were observed. The N1 showed stimulus-specific LTH in that N1 amplitudes declined during the presentation of a stimulus, but returned to control levels when a different stimulus was presented in the subsequent condition. In contrast, the P3 elicited by the deviant stimuli showed non-specific LTH, being reduced across successive blocks containing different stimuli. P3s elicited by target stimuli remained stable in amplitude.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2429824     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(86)90024-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  27 in total

1.  Short-term habituation of auditory evoked potential and neuromagnetic field components in dependence of the interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Karen Zimmerer; Ralph Huonker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a featural distinction of English consonants: sensor- and source-space data.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Jennifer Merickel; Joshua Riley; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Neural responses elicited to face motion and vocalization pairings.

Authors:  Aina Puce; James A Epling; James C Thompson; Olivia K Carrick
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  It all sounds the same to me: sequential ERP and behavioral effects during pitch and harmonicity judgments.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Event-related potentials reflect spectral differences in speech and non-speech stimuli in children and adults.

Authors:  R Ceponiene; M Torki; P Alku; A Koyama; J Townsend
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Adaptation of high-gamma responses in human auditory association cortex.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Nathan E Crone; William S Anderson; Deepti Ramadoss; Frederick A Lenz; Dana Boatman-Reich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Summary of the N1-P2 Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential to Estimate the Auditory Threshold in Adults.

Authors:  Guy Lightfoot
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

9.  Signal type and signal-to-noise ratio interact to affect cortical auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Leslie D Grush
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Repeated stimulus exposure alters the way sound is encoded in the human brain.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kayo Inoue; Katrina McClannahan; Bernhard Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.