Literature DB >> 24297462

Metal distribution and spectroscopic analysis after soil washing with chelating agents and humic substances.

Daniel C W Tsang1, Neil R Hartley.   

Abstract

Biodegradable chelating agents ([S,S]-ethylenediamine-N,N-disuccinic acid (EDDS) and glutamic-N,N-diacetic acid (GLDA)) and natural humic substances (lignite-derived, standard, and commercially available humic acids) are potentially useful for enhancing soil remediation of timber treatment sites. This study integrated macroscopic and spectroscopic analyses to assess their influence on the distribution and chemical speciation of the remaining metals as well as their interaction with the soil surface after 48-h washing of a field-contaminated soil. The results demonstrated that EDDS and GLDA were an appealing alternative to non-biodegradable ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid, but the three humic substances were less effective. As shown by sequential extractions, Cu was primarily extracted from the carbonate fraction while Cr and As extraction resulted from (co-)dissolution of the oxide fraction. As a result, the relative proportion of strongly bound organic matter and residual fractions increased by 7-16 %. However, it was noteworthy that the exchangeable fraction also increased by 5-11 %, signifying that a portion of the remaining metals was destabilized by chelating agents and transformed to be more labile in the treated soil. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra confirmed the substantial removal of readily accessible Cu from the soil surface, but Cr maintained its original chemical forms of trivalent chromium oxides and iron-chromium coprecipitates, whereas As remained as arsenic trioxide/pentoxide and copper arsenate precipitates. On the other hand, the absence of characteristic peaks of adsorbed carboxylate groups in the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra inferred that the extent of adsorption of chelating agents and humic substances on the bulk soil was insufficient to be characterized by FTIR analysis. These results suggested that attention should be paid to the exchangeable fraction of Cu and oxides/coprecipitates of As prior to possible on-site reuse of the treated soil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297462     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2300-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  32 in total

1.  Leaching of arsenic, chromium, and copper in a contaminated soil at a wood preserving site.

Authors:  Y-C Jang; T G Townsend; M Ward; G Bitton
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  A comparison of the technical sustainability of in situ stabilisation/solidification with disposal to landfill.

Authors:  M J Harbottle; A Al-Tabbaa; C W Evans
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  The orientation of beta-sheets in porin. A polarized Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic investigation.

Authors:  E Nabedryk; R M Garavito; J Breton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Generic NICA-Donnan model parameters for metal-ion binding by humic substances.

Authors:  Christopher J Milne; David G Kinniburgh; Willem H van Riemsdijk; Edward Tipping
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  EDTA-assisted phytoextraction of heavy metals by turfgrass from municipal solid waste compost using permeable barriers and associated potential leaching risk.

Authors:  Shulan Zhao; Fei Lian; Lian Duo
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil washing residues with amino polycarboxylic acids.

Authors:  Zandra Arwidsson; Kristin Elgh-Dalgren; Thomas von Kronhelm; Ragnar Sjöberg; Bert Allard; Patrick van Hees
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Sorption of metal ions on lignite and the derived humic substances.

Authors:  Martina Havelcová; Jirí Mizera; Ivana Sýkorová; Miloslav Pekar
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  Influence of EDTA washing on the species and mobility of heavy metals residual in soils.

Authors:  Weihua Zhang; Hao Huang; Fenfang Tan; Hong Wang; Rongliang Qiu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 10.588

9.  EDTA leaching of Cu contaminated soil using electrochemical treatment of the washing solution.

Authors:  Maja Pociecha; Domen Lestan
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 10.588

10.  Modeling the transport of metals with rate-limited EDTA-promoted extraction and dissolution during EDTA-flushing of copper-contaminated soils.

Authors:  Daniel C W Tsang; Irene M C Lo; K L Chan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  8 in total

1.  Arsenic and copper stabilisation in a contaminated soil by coal fly ash and green waste compost.

Authors:  Daniel C W Tsang; Alex C K Yip; William E Olds; Paul A Weber
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Removal, redistribution, and potential risks of soil Cd, Pb, and Zn after washing with various extractants.

Authors:  Chunle Chen; Yanhui Chen; Tuanhui Xie; Ming Kuang Wang; Guo Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Environmentally friendly remediation of lead/cadmium co-contaminated loess soil in northwestern China using a humificated straw solution.

Authors:  Chunhui Fan; Yingchao Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Influence of multi-step washing using Na2EDTA, oxalic acid and phosphoric acid on metal fractionation and spectroscopy characteristics from contaminated soil.

Authors:  Meng Wei; Jiajun Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Enhanced degradation of Orange G by permanganate with the employment of iron anode.

Authors:  Lingjun Bu; Zhou Shi; Shiqing Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Risk mitigation by waste-based permeable reactive barriers for groundwater pollution control at e-waste recycling sites.

Authors:  Jingzi Beiyuan; Daniel C W Tsang; Alex C K Yip; Weihua Zhang; Yong Sik Ok; Xiang-Dong Li
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Effect of biogeochemical interactions on bioaccessibility of arsenic in soils of a former smelter site in Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Kyung Yang; Seulki Jeong; Eun Hea Jho; Kyoungphile Nam
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.609

8.  Effect of Chelant-Based Soil Washing and Post-Treatment on Pb, Cd, and Zn Bioavailability and Plant Uptake.

Authors:  Christoph Noller; Wolfgang Friesl-Hanl; Rebecca Hood-Nowotny; Markus Puschenreiter; Andrea Watzinger
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.520

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.