Literature DB >> 26932558

Risk mitigation by waste-based permeable reactive barriers for groundwater pollution control at e-waste recycling sites.

Jingzi Beiyuan1, Daniel C W Tsang2, Alex C K Yip3, Weihua Zhang4,5, Yong Sik Ok6, Xiang-Dong Li1.   

Abstract

Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) have proved to be a promising passive treatment to control groundwater contamination and associated human health risks. This study explored the potential use of low-cost adsorbents as PRBs media and assessed their longevity and risk mitigation against leaching of acidic rainfall through an e-waste recycling site, of which Cu, Zn, and Pb were the major contaminants. Batch adsorption experiments suggested a higher adsorption capacity of inorganic industrial by-products [acid mine drainage sludge (AMDS) and coal fly ash (CFA)] and carbonaceous recycled products [food waste compost (FWC) and wood-derived biochar] compared to natural inorganic minerals (limestone and apatite). Continuous leaching tests of sand columns with 10 wt% low-cost adsorbents were then conducted to mimic the field situation of acidic rainfall infiltration through e-waste-contaminated soils (collected from Qingyuan, China) by using synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) solution. In general, Zn leached out first, followed by Cu, and finally delayed breakthrough of Pb. In the worst-case scenario (e.g., at initial concentrations equal to 50-fold of average SPLP result), the columns with limestone, apatite, AMDS, or biochar were effective for a relatively short period of about 20-40 pore volumes of leaching, after which Cu breakthrough caused non-cancer risk concern and later-stage Pb leaching considerably increased both non-cancer and lifetime cancer risk associated with portable use of contaminated water. In contrast, the columns with CFA or FWC successfully mitigated overall risks to an acceptable level for a prolonged period of 100-200 pore volumes. Therefore, with proper selection of low-cost adsorbents (or their mixture), waste-based PRBs is a technically feasible and economically viable solution to mitigate human health risk due to contaminated groundwater at e-waste recycling sites.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charcoal; Compost; Groundwater remediation; Health risks; Metal contamination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26932558     DOI: 10.1007/s10653-016-9808-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  40 in total

1.  Monitoring of lead, cadmium, chromium and nickel in placenta from an e-waste recycling town in China.

Authors:  Yongyong Guo; Xia Huo; Yan Li; Kusheng Wu; Junxiao Liu; Jingrong Huang; Guina Zheng; Qiongna Xiao; Hui Yang; Yuanping Wang; Aimin Chen; Xijin Xu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Heavy metal contamination in soils and vegetables near an e-waste processing site, South China.

Authors:  Chunling Luo; Chuanping Liu; Yan Wang; Xiang Liu; Fangbai Li; Gan Zhang; Xiangdong Li
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 3.  Environmental-benign utilisation of fly ash as low-cost adsorbents.

Authors:  Shaobin Wang; Hongwei Wu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Soil stabilisation using AMD sludge, compost and lignite: TCLP leachability and continuous acid leaching.

Authors:  Daniel C W Tsang; William E Olds; Paul A Weber; Alex C K Yip
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Sludge-Derived Biochar for Arsenic(III) Immobilization: Effects of Solution Chemistry on Sorption Behavior.

Authors:  Weihua Zhang; Juan Zheng; Pingping Zheng; Daniel C W Tsang; Rongliang Qiu
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Mobility, bioavailability and pH-dependent leaching of cadmium, zinc and lead in a contaminated soil amended with biochar.

Authors:  David Houben; Laurent Evrard; Philippe Sonnet
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Potential application of sludge produced from coal mine drainage treatment for removing Zn(II) in an aqueous phase.

Authors:  Mingcan Cui; Min Jang; Sang-Hyun Cho; Jeehyeong Khim
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.609

8.  Stabilization of lead and copper contaminated firing range soil using calcined oyster shells and fly ash.

Authors:  Deok Hyun Moon; Jae-Woo Park; Kyung Hoon Cheong; Seunghun Hyun; Agamemnon Koutsospyros; Jeong-Hun Park; Yong Sik Ok
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 9.  Chemical stabilization of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides--a review.

Authors:  Michael Komárek; Aleš Vaněk; Vojtěch Ettler
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Heavy metals concentrations of surface dust from e-waste recycling and its human health implications in southeast China.

Authors:  Anna O W Leung; Nurdan S Duzgoren-Aydin; K C Cheung; Ming H Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  2 in total

1.  Remediation of lead and cadmium from simulated groundwater in loess region in northwestern China using permeable reactive barrier filled with environmentally friendly mixed adsorbents.

Authors:  Chunhui Fan; Yalin Gao; Yingchao Zhang; Wanqing Dong; Miao Lai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Animal carcass burial management: implications for sustainable biochar use.

Authors:  Meththika Vithanage; S S Mayakaduwage; Viraj Gunarathne; Anushka Upamali Rajapaksha; Mahtab Ahmad; Adel Abduljabbar; Adel Usman; Mohammad I Al-Wabel; James A Ippolito; Yong Sik Ok
Journal:  Appl Biol Chem       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.813

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.