Literature DB >> 24297306

Commercial bumblebee hives to assess an anthropogenic environment for pollinator support: a case study in the region of Ghent (Belgium).

Laurian Parmentier1, Ivan Meeus, Lore Cheroutre, Veerle Mommaerts, Stephen Louwye, Guy Smagghe.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic changes of the environment influence the distribution and abundance of pollinators such as bumblebees and have been proposed as one of the main causes in their worldwide decline. In order to evaluate the impact of expanding anthropogenic landscapes on supporting pollinator potential, reliable tools are needed. Bombus terrestris is one of the most abundant bumblebee species in Europe, and these bumblebees are known as generalist pollinators of not only wild flowers in nature but also of crops in agriculture. For more than two decades, these bumblebees have been commercially mass reared for biological pollination in greenhouses. In this project, we placed commercial hives of the bumblebee B. terrestris containing one queen and 40 workers, in three different locations in the region of Ghent (Belgium), and the performance of these hives was followed during a 4-week period in spring 2012. In parallel, we determined the floral richness and diversity index in the chosen study sites. The sites consisted of a rich urban environment with patchy green areas opposed to an urban environment with poor landscape metrics; a third rural study site showed average positive landscape metrics. The results demonstrated that the hive biomass and numbers of workers increased significantly in the rich compared to the poor environment, providing a mechanism to discriminate between study sites. In addition, the bumblebee-collected pollen showed that the flowering plants Salix spp. and Rosaceae/Prunus spp. are dominant food sources in all anthropogenic environments during early spring. Finally, the results are discussed in relation to the optimization of the experimental setup and to the use of commercial bumblebee hives in assessing local pollinator support within any given environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297306     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3543-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  14 in total

1.  Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees.

Authors:  Sydney A Cameron; Jeffrey D Lozier; James P Strange; Jonathan B Koch; Nils Cordes; Leellen F Solter; Terry L Griswold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Buzziness as usual? Questioning the global pollination crisis.

Authors:  Jaboury Ghazoul
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Genetically engineered plants, endangered species, and risk: a temporal and spatial exposure assessment for Karner blue butterfly larvae and Bt maize pollen.

Authors:  Robert K D Peterson; Steven J Meyer; Amy T Wolf; Jeffrey D Wolt; Paula M Davis
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Neonicotinoid pesticide reduces bumble bee colony growth and queen production.

Authors:  Penelope R Whitehorn; Stephanie O'Connor; Felix L Wackers; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Risk assessment for side-effects of neonicotinoids against bumblebees with and without impairing foraging behavior.

Authors:  Veerle Mommaerts; Sofie Reynders; Jana Boulet; Linde Besard; Guido Sterk; Guy Smagghe
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 7.  A meta-analysis of bees' responses to anthropogenic disturbance.

Authors:  Rachael Winfree; Ramiro Aguilar; Diego P Vázquez; Gretchen LeBuhn; Marcelo A Aizen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  A laboratory evaluation to determine the compatibility of microbiological control agents with the pollinator Bombus terrestris.

Authors:  Veerle Mommaerts; Guido Sterk; Lucien Hoffmann; Guy Smagghe
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.845

9.  An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species.

Authors:  M E Knight; A P Martin; S Bishop; J L Osborne; R J Hale; R A Sanderson; D Goulson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Spatial and temporal variation of metal concentrations in adult honeybees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Jozef J M van der Steen; Joop de Kraker; Tim Grotenhuis
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.513

View more
  8 in total

1.  QSAR modeling in ecotoxicological risk assessment: application to the prediction of acute contact toxicity of pesticides on bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Mabrouk Hamadache; Othmane Benkortbi; Salah Hanini; Abdeltif Amrane
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing Demonstrates that Indoor-Reared Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) Harbor a Core Subset of Bacteria Normally Associated with the Wild Host.

Authors:  Ivan Meeus; Laurian Parmentier; Annelies Billiet; Kevin Maebe; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Dieter Deforce; Felix Wäckers; Peter Vandamme; Guy Smagghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Reliability of the entomovector technology using Prestop-Mix and Bombus terrestris L. as a fungal disease biocontrol method in open field.

Authors:  Reet Karise; Gerit Dreyersdorff; Mona Jahani; Eve Veromann; Eve Runno-Paurson; Tanel Kaart; Guy Smagghe; Marika Mänd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Disentangling urban habitat and matrix effects on wild bee species.

Authors:  Leonie K Fischer; Julia Eichfeld; Ingo Kowarik; Sascha Buchholz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Lower bumblebee colony reproductive success in agricultural compared with urban environments.

Authors:  Ash E Samuelson; Richard J Gill; Mark J F Brown; Ellouise Leadbeater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Reduced nest development of reared Bombus terrestris within apiary dense human-modified landscapes.

Authors:  Ivan Meeus; Laurian Parmentier; Matti Pisman; Dirk C de Graaf; Guy Smagghe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Use of video surveillance to measure the influences of habitat management and landscape composition on pollinator visitation and pollen deposition in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) agroecosystems.

Authors:  Benjamin W Phillips; Mary M Gardiner
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Food for Pollinators: Quantifying the Nectar and Pollen Resources of Urban Flower Meadows.

Authors:  Damien M Hicks; Pierre Ouvrard; Katherine C R Baldock; Mathilde Baude; Mark A Goddard; William E Kunin; Nadine Mitschunas; Jane Memmott; Helen Morse; Maria Nikolitsi; Lynne M Osgathorpe; Simon G Potts; Kirsty M Robertson; Anna V Scott; Frazer Sinclair; Duncan B Westbury; Graham N Stone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.