Literature DB >> 24295943

Controversies in lung cancer screening.

Ritu R Gill1, Michael T Jaklitsch, Francine L Jacobson.   

Abstract

There remains an extensive debate over lung cancer screening, with lobbying for and against screening for very compelling reasons. The National Lung Screening Trial, International Early Lung Cancer Program, and other major screening studies favor screening with low-dose CT scans and have shown a reduction in lung cancer--specific mortality. The increasing incidence of lung cancer and the dismal survival rate for advanced disease despite improved multimodality therapy have sparked an interest in the implementation of national lung cancer screening. Concerns over imaging workflow, radiation dose, management of small nodules, overdiagnosis bias, lead-time and length-time bias, emerging new technologies, and cost-effectiveness continue to be debated. The authors address each of these issues as they relate to radiologic practice.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT scan; Lung cancer; low-dose CT; lung cancer screening; overdiagnosis bias; tumor volume doubling time

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24295943     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary nodule management.

Authors:  Simon C Y Chow; Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Imaging-based screening: understanding the controversies.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Pari V Pandharipande; Janie M Lee; Constance D Lehman; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Geographic variation in radiologist capacity and widespread implementation of lung cancer CT screening.

Authors:  Fabrice Smieliauskas; Heber MacMahon; Ravi Salgia; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Consolidated principles for screening based on a systematic review and consensus process.

Authors:  Mark J Dobrow; Victoria Hagens; Roger Chafe; Terrence Sullivan; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Ventilation Heterogeneity and Its Association with Nodule Formation Among Participants in the National Lung Screening Trial-A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  David A Kaminsky; Nirav Daphtary; Raul S J Estepar; Taka Ashikaga; Lukas Mikulic; Jeffrey Klein; C Matthew Kinsey
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Image-guided video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (iVATS) - phase I-II clinical trial.

Authors:  Ritu R Gill; Yifan Zheng; Julianne S Barlow; Jagadeesan Jayender; Erin E Girard; Philip M Hartigan; Lucian R Chirieac; Carol J Belle-King; Kristen Murray; Christopher Sears; Jon O Wee; Michael T Jaklitsch; Yolonda L Colson; Raphael Bueno
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Molecular Changes of Lung Malignancy in HIV Infection.

Authors:  Jianghua Zheng; Lin Wang; Zenghui Cheng; Zenglin Pei; Zhiyong Zhang; Zehuan Li; Xuan Zhang; Dong Yan; Qianlin Xia; Yanling Feng; Yanzheng Song; Weiping Chen; Xiaoyan Zhang; Jianqing Xu; Jin Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  How Health-Care Organizations Implement Shared Decision-making When It Is Required for Reimbursement: The Case of Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Kea Turner; M Patricia Rivera; Daniel S Reuland; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 9.410

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.