Literature DB >> 24295802

Periprosthetic fracture torque for short versus standard cemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.

Takkan Morishima1, Bastiaan L Ginsel1, Godwin G H Choy1, Lance J Wilson1, Sarah L Whitehouse1, Ross W Crawford1.   

Abstract

In an attempt to preserve proximal femoral bone stock and achieve a better fit in smaller femora, especially in the Asian population, several new shorter stem designs have become available. We investigated the torque to periprosthetic femoral fracture of the Exeter short stem compared with the conventional length Exeter stem in a Sawbone model. Forty-two stems; 21 shorter and 21 conventional stems both with three different offsets were cemented in a composite Sawbone model and torqued to fracture. Results showed that Sawbone femurs break at a statistically significantly lower torque to failure with a shorter compared to conventional-length Exeter stem of the same offset. Both standard and short-stem designs are safe to use as the torque to failure is 7-10 times that seen in activities of daily living.
© 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical study; fracture load; sawbones; short femoral stem; stress shielding

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24295802     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

Review 1.  Periprosthetic fractures: concepts of biomechanical in vitro investigations.

Authors:  Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Femoral cortical thickness influences the pattern of proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures with a cemented stem.

Authors:  Jarrad Stevens; Nicholas Clement; Michael Nasserallah; Michael Millar; Sam Joseph
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-08

3.  The effects of patient characteristics and stem alignment on distal femoral cortical hypertrophy after cemented polished tapered stem implantation.

Authors:  Toshiki Iwase; Daigo Morita; Genta Takemoto
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-19

4.  Femur Strength is Similar Before and After Iatrogenic Fracture During Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Bailey J Ross; Akshar H Patel; J Heath Wilder; John M Weldy; Charles S Dranoff; Matthew J Weintraub; Nathan E Kim; Hao Wang; William F Sherman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  Comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture torque and strain pattern of three types of femoral components in experimental model.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Takegami; Taisuke Seki; Yusuke Osawa; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.410

6.  Comparison of axial-rotational postoperative periprosthetic fracture of the femur in composite osteoporotic femur versus human cadaveric specimens: A validation study.

Authors:  Jonathan N Lamb; Oliver Coltart; Isaiah Adekanmbi; Hemant G Pandit; Todd Stewart
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  High risk of early periprosthetic fractures after primary hip arthroplasty in elderly patients using a cemented, tapered, polished stem.

Authors:  Cyrus Brodén; Sebastian Mukka; Olle Muren; Thomas Eisler; Henrik Boden; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Substantially higher prevalence of postoperative peri-prosthetic fractures in octogenarians with hip fractures operated with a cemented, polished tapered stem rather than an anatomic stem.

Authors:  Sebastian Mukka; Carl Mellner; Björn Knutsson; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: a comparative in vitro study regarding primary stability and maximum fracture load.

Authors:  Tobias Freitag; Karl Philipp Kutzner; Ralf Bieger; Heiko Reichel; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.067

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.