| Literature DB >> 24292730 |
Shiau-Shian Huang, Ching-Heng Lin, El-Wui Loh, Hsin-yu Yang, Chin Hong Chan, Tsuo-Hung Lan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors compared the efficacy of long-acting injectable antipsychotics and oral antipsychotics on rehospitalization rate of community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia who had frequent admissions. METHODS The cohort study of 14,610 patients was conducted by analyzing the Taiwan National Health Research Institutes data. The patients were divided into groups that received oral antipsychotics (risperidone, a different second-generation antipsychotic, or a first-generation antipsychotic) or long-acting injectable antipsychotics (risperidone, haloperidol, or flupenthixol). RESULTS One-year rehospitalization rates of the final cohort of 10,552 patients were the same for both groups (by long-acting injection, 27.3%; by oral administration, 27.3%). Secondary analysis of groups receiving long-acting injectable medication showed that haloperidol resulted in lower rehospitalization rates (haloperidol, 22.5%; risperidone, 27.1%; and flupenthixol, 29.5%). Patients' characteristics, including age, region, and insurance payments were significantly correlated with the risk of relapse (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS Except for injectable haloperidol, long-acting injectable antipsychotics seem not to be superior to oral antipsychotics in reducing rehospitalization.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24292730 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychiatr Serv ISSN: 1075-2730 Impact factor: 3.084