Literature DB >> 15040823

Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions.

Kate Ward1, Chrissie Alsop, Janette Caulton, Clinton Rubin, Judith Adams, Zulf Mughal.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The osteogenic potential of short durations of low-level mechanical stimuli was examined in children with disabling conditions. The mean change in tibia vTBMD was +6.3% in the intervention group compared with -11.9% in the control group. This pilot randomized controlled trial provides preliminary evidence that low-level mechanical stimuli represent a noninvasive, non-pharmacological treatment of low BMD in children with disabling conditions.
INTRODUCTION: Recent animal studies have demonstrated the anabolic potential of low-magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli to the trabecular bone of weight-bearing regions of the skeleton. The main aim of this prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial (RCT) was to examine whether these signals could effectively increase tibial and spinal volumetric trabecular BMD (vTBMD; mg/ml) in children with disabling conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty pre-or postpubertal disabled, ambulant, children (14 males, 6 females; mean age, 9.1 +/- 4.3 years; range, 4-19 years) were randomized to standing on active (n = 10; 0.3g, 90 Hz) or placebo (n = 10) devices for 10 minutes/day, 5 days/week for 6 months. The primary outcomes of the trial were proximal tibial and spinal (L2) vTBMD (mg/ml), measured using 3-D QCT. Posthoc analyses were performed to determine whether the treatment had an effect on diaphyseal cortical bone and muscle parameters. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Compliance was 44% (4.4 minutes per day), as determined by mean time on treatment (567.9 minutes) compared with expected time on treatment over the 6 months (1300 minutes). After 6 months, the mean change in proximal tibial vTBMD in children who stood on active devices was 6.27 mg/ml (+6.3%); in children who stood on placebo devices, vTBMD decreased by -9.45 mg/ml (-11.9%). Thus, the net benefit of treatment was +15.72 mg/ml (17.7%; p = 0.0033). In the spine, the net benefit of treatment, compared with placebo, was +6.72 mg/ml, (p = 0.14). Diaphyseal bone and muscle parameters did not show a response to treatment. The results of this pilot RCT have shown for the first time that low-magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli are anabolic to trabecular bone in children, possibly by providing a surrogate for suppressed muscular activity in the disabled. Over the course of a longer treatment period, harnessing bone's sensitivity to these stimuli may provide a non-pharmacological treatment for bone fragility in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15040823     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.040129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  126 in total

1.  Low bone density and bone metabolism alterations in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: response to calcium and vitamin D treatment.

Authors:  M L Bianchi; L Morandi; E Andreucci; S Vai; J Frasunkiewicz; R Cottafava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Weight bearing through lower limbs in a standing frame with and without arm support and low-magnitude whole-body vibration in men and women with complete motor paraplegia.

Authors:  Kathie A Bernhardt; Lisa A Beck; Jeffry L Lamb; Kenton R Kaufman; Shreyasee Amin; Lisa-Ann Wuermser
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Evidence for an additional effect of whole-body vibration above resistive exercise alone in preventing bone loss during prolonged bed rest.

Authors:  D L Belavý; G Beller; G Armbrecht; F H Perschel; R Fitzner; O Bock; H Börst; C Degner; U Gast; D Felsenberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Understanding Mechanobiology: Physical Therapists as a Force in Mechanotherapy and Musculoskeletal Regenerative Rehabilitation.

Authors:  William R Thompson; Alexander Scott; M Terry Loghmani; Samuel R Ward; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12-04

Review 5.  Exercise for people with osteoporosis: translating the science into clinical practice.

Authors:  Kathy M Shipp
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Dystrophin and utrophin "double knockout" dystrophic mice exhibit a spectrum of degenerative musculoskeletal abnormalities.

Authors:  Christian Isaac; Adam Wright; Arvydas Usas; Hongshuai Li; Ying Tang; Xiaodong Mu; Nicholas Greco; Qing Dong; Nam Vo; James Kang; Bing Wang; Johnny Huard
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Whole Body Vibration Reduces Inflammatory Bone Loss in a Lipopolysaccharide Murine Model.

Authors:  I S Kim; B Lee; S J Yoo; S J Hwang
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  The effects of photobiomodulation and low-amplitude high-frequency vibration on bone healing process: a comparative study.

Authors:  M Rajaei Jafarabadi; G Rouhi; G Kaka; S H Sadraie; J Arum
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Whole-body vibration slows the acquisition of fat in mature female rats.

Authors:  G F Maddalozzo; U T Iwaniec; R T Turner; C J Rosen; J J Widrick
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Safety and severity of accelerations delivered from whole body vibration exercise devices to standing adults.

Authors:  Jesse Muir; Douglas P Kiel; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.319

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.