Literature DB >> 24292553

Learning from unbalanced data: a cascade-based approach for detecting clustered microcalcifications.

A Bria1, N Karssemeijer2, F Tortorella3.   

Abstract

Finding abnormalities in diagnostic images is a difficult task even for expert radiologists because the normal tissue locations largely outnumber those with suspicious signs which may thus be missed or incorrectly interpreted. For the same reason the design of a Computer-Aided Detection (CADe) system is very complex because the large predominance of normal samples in the training data may hamper the ability of the classifier to recognize the abnormalities on the images. In this paper we present a novel approach for computer-aided detection which faces the class imbalance with a cascade of boosting classifiers where each node is trained by a learning algorithm based on ranking instead of classification error. Such approach is used to design a system (CasCADe) for the automated detection of clustered microcalcifications (μCs), which is a severely unbalanced classification problem because of the vast majority of image locations where no μC is present. The proposed approach was evaluated with a dataset of 1599 full-field digital mammograms from 560 cases and compared favorably with the Hologic R2CAD ImageChecker, one of the most widespread commercial CADe systems. In particular, at the same lesion sensitivity of R2CAD (90%) on biopsy proven malignant cases, CasCADe and R2CAD detected 0.13 and 0.21 false positives per image (FPpi), respectively (p-value=0.09), whereas at the same FPpi of R2CAD (0.21), CasCADe and R2CAD detected 93% and 90% of true lesions respectively (p-value=0.11) thus showing that CasCADe can compete with high-end CADe commercial systems.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Clustered microcalcifications; Computer aided detection; Mammography; Unbalanced data

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24292553     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2013.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  16 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on planar projection images.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz; Kristina Lång; Albert Gubern-Merida; Mireille Broeders; Gisella Gennaro; Paola Clauser; Thomas H Helbich; Margarita Chevalier; Tao Tan; Thomas Mertelmeier; Matthew G Wallis; Ingvar Andersson; Sophia Zackrisson; Ritse M Mann; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Can Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Be Predicted Using Computer-extracted Mammographic Features?

Authors:  Bibo Shi; Lars J Grimm; Maciej A Mazurowski; Jay A Baker; Jeffrey R Marks; Lorraine M King; Carlo C Maley; E Shelley Hwang; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Locally adaptive decision in detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  María V Sainz de Cea; Robert M Nishikawa; Yongyi Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis using joint information from volumetric and planar projection images.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Prediction of Upstaging in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Based on Mammographic Radiomic Features.

Authors:  Rui Hou; Lars J Grimm; Maciej A Mazurowski; Jeffrey R Marks; Lorraine M King; Carlo C Maley; Thomas Lynch; Marja van Oirsouw; Keith Rogers; Nicholas Stone; Matthew Wallis; Jonas Teuwen; Jelle Wesseling; E Shelley Hwang; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 29.146

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Geras; Ritse M Mann; Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Prediction of Upstaged Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Forced Labeling and Domain Adaptation.

Authors:  Rui Hou; Maciej A Mazurowski; Lars J Grimm; Jeffrey R Marks; Lorraine M King; Carlo C Maley; Eun-Sil Shelley Hwang; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Can artificial intelligence reduce the interval cancer rate in mammography screening?

Authors:  Kristina Lång; Solveig Hofvind; Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Ingvar Andersson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  NMFBFS: A NMF-Based Feature Selection Method in Identifying Pivotal Clinical Symptoms of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhiwei Ji; Guanmin Meng; Deshuang Huang; Xiaoqiang Yue; Bing Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.