Literature DB >> 24292500

Developmental variation of the SUUR protein binding correlates with gene regulation and specific chromatin types in D. melanogaster.

Daniil A Maksimov1, Dmitry E Koryakov, Stepan N Belyakin.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes are organized in large chromatin domains that maintain proper gene activity in the cell. These domains may be permissive or repressive to the transcription of underlying genes. Based on its protein makeup, chromatin in Drosophila cell culture has been recently categorized into five color-coded states. Suppressor of Under-Replication (SUUR) protein was found to be the major component present in all three repressive chromatin states named BLACK, BLUE, and GREEN and to be depleted from the active YELLOW and RED chromatin types. Here, we addressed the question of developmental dynamics of SUUR binding as a marker of repressed chromatin types. We established genomewide SUUR binding profiles in larval salivary gland, brain, and embryos using DNA adenine methyltransferase identification (DamID) technique, performed their pairwise comparisons and comparisons with the published data from Drosophila Kc cells. SUUR binding pattern was found to vary between the samples. Increase in SUUR binding predominantly correlated with local gene repression suggesting heterochromatin formation. Reduction in SUUR binding often coincided with activation of tissue-specific genes probably reflecting the transition to permissive chromatin state and increase in accessibility to specific transcription factors. SUUR binding plasticity accompanied by the regulation of the underlying genes was mainly observed in BLACK, BLUE, and RED chromatin types. Our results provide novel insight into the developmental dynamics of repressive chromatin and reveal a link to the chromatin-guided regulation of gene expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24292500     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-013-0445-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  45 in total

Review 1.  Position effect variegation and chromatin proteins.

Authors:  G Reuter; P Spierer
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  The Drosophila suppressor of underreplication protein binds to late-replicating regions of polytene chromosomes.

Authors:  I V Makunin; E I Volkova; E S Belyaeva; E N Nabirochkina; V Pirrotta; I F Zhimulev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  DamID: mapping of in vivo protein-genome interactions using tethered DNA adenine methyltransferase.

Authors:  Frauke Greil; Celine Moorman; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Direct targets of the D. melanogaster DSXF protein and the evolution of sexual development.

Authors:  Shengzhan D Luo; Guang W Shi; Bruce S Baker
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Genome-wide HP1 binding in Drosophila: developmental plasticity and genomic targeting signals.

Authors:  Elzo de Wit; Frauke Greil; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome.

Authors:  Jason Ernst; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brenton R Graveley; Angela N Brooks; Joseph W Carlson; Michael O Duff; Jane M Landolin; Li Yang; Carlo G Artieri; Marijke J van Baren; Nathan Boley; Benjamin W Booth; James B Brown; Lucy Cherbas; Carrie A Davis; Alex Dobin; Renhua Li; Wei Lin; John H Malone; Nicolas R Mattiuzzo; David Miller; David Sturgill; Brian B Tuch; Chris Zaleski; Dayu Zhang; Marco Blanchette; Sandrine Dudoit; Brian Eads; Richard E Green; Ann Hammonds; Lichun Jiang; Phil Kapranov; Laura Langton; Norbert Perrimon; Jeremy E Sandler; Kenneth H Wan; Aarron Willingham; Yu Zhang; Yi Zou; Justen Andrews; Peter J Bickel; Steven E Brenner; Michael R Brent; Peter Cherbas; Thomas R Gingeras; Roger A Hoskins; Thomas C Kaufman; Brian Oliver; Susan E Celniker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Exploiting position effects and the gypsy retrovirus insulator to engineer precisely expressed transgenes.

Authors:  Michele Markstein; Chrysoula Pitsouli; Christians Villalta; Susan E Celniker; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-03-02       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes.

Authors:  A H Brand; N Perrimon
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  13 in total

1.  Data analysis algorithm for DamID-seq profiling of chromatin proteins in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniil A Maksimov; Petr P Laktionov; Stepan N Belyakin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  DNA replication in nurse cell polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster otu mutants.

Authors:  Dmitry E Koryakov; Igor F Zhimulev
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Super-resolution microscopy reveals stochastic initiation of replication in Drosophila polytene chromosomes.

Authors:  Tatyana D Kolesnikova; Galina V Pokholkova; Viktoria V Dovgan; Igor F Zhimulev; Veit Schubert
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Genome-wide analysis of SU(VAR)3-9 distribution in chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniil A Maksimov; Petr P Laktionov; Olga V Posukh; Stepan N Belyakin; Dmitry E Koryakov
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Incomplete replication generates somatic DNA alterations within Drosophila polytene salivary gland cells.

Authors:  Will Yarosh; Allan C Spradling
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Piwi interacts with chromatin at nuclear pores and promiscuously binds nuclear transcripts in Drosophila ovarian somatic cells.

Authors:  Artem A Ilyin; Sergei S Ryazansky; Semen A Doronin; Oxana M Olenkina; Elena A Mikhaleva; Evgeny Y Yakushev; Yuri A Abramov; Stepan N Belyakin; Anton V Ivankin; Alexey V Pindyurin; Vladimir A Gvozdev; Mikhail S Klenov; Yuri Y Shevelyov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Similarity in replication timing between polytene and diploid cells is associated with the organization of the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Tatyana D Kolesnikova; Fedor P Goncharov; Igor F Zhimulev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inducible DamID systems for genomic mapping of chromatin proteins in Drosophila.

Authors:  Alexey V Pindyurin; Ludo Pagie; Elena N Kozhevnikova; Joris van Arensbergen; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Functional dissection of Drosophila melanogaster SUUR protein influence on H3K27me3 profile.

Authors:  Olga V Posukh; Daniil A Maksimov; Petr P Laktionov; Dmitry E Koryakov; Stepan N Belyakin
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.954

10.  Genome-wide analysis of gene regulation mechanisms during Drosophila spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Petr P Laktionov; Daniil A Maksimov; Stanislav E Romanov; Polina A Antoshina; Olga V Posukh; Helen White-Cooper; Dmitry E Koryakov; Stepan N Belyakin
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.