Literature DB >> 1365916

Position effect variegation and chromatin proteins.

G Reuter1, P Spierer.   

Abstract

Variegated phenotypes often result from chromosomal rearrangements that place euchromatic genes next to heterochromatin. In such rearrangements, the condensed structure of heterochromatin can spread into euchromatic regions, which then assume the morphology of heterochromatin and become transcriptionally inactive. In position-effect variegation (PEV) therefore, gene inactivation results from a change in chromatin structure. PEV has been intensively investigated in the fruitfly Drosophila, where the phenomenon allows a genetic dissection of chromatin components. Consequently, many genes have been identified which, when mutated, act as dominant modifiers (suppressors or enhancers) of PEV. Data available already demonstrate that genetic, molecular and developmental analysis of these genes provides an avenue to the identification of regulatory and structural chromatin components, and hence to fundamental aspects of chromosome structure and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1365916     DOI: 10.1002/bies.950140907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  124 in total

1.  The size and internal structure of a heterochromatic block determine its ability to induce position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E V Tolchkov; V I Rasheva; S Bonaccorsi; T Westphal; V A Gvozdev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The AT-hook protein D1 is essential for Drosophila melanogaster development and is implicated in position-effect variegation.

Authors:  Nathalie Aulner; Caroline Monod; Guillaume Mandicourt; Denis Jullien; Olivier Cuvier; Alhousseynou Sall; Sam Janssen; Ulrich K Laemmli; Emmanuel Käs
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Position-effect variegation in Drosophila: the modifier Su(var)3-7 is a modular DNA-binding protein.

Authors:  F Cléard; P Spierer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Recombinogenic effects of suppressors of position-effect variegation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Thomas Westphal; Gunter Reuter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Set9, a novel histone H3 methyltransferase that facilitates transcription by precluding histone tail modifications required for heterochromatin formation.

Authors:  Kenichi Nishioka; Sergei Chuikov; Kavitha Sarma; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; C David Allis; Paul Tempst; Danny Reinberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Physical and functional association of SU(VAR)3-9 and HDAC1 in Drosophila.

Authors:  B Czermin; G Schotta; B B Hülsmann; A Brehm; P B Becker; G Reuter; A Imhof
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-09-24       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 7.  Transcriptional transgene silencing and chromatin components.

Authors:  P Meyer
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 8.  Chromatin proteins are determinants of centromere function.

Authors:  J A Sharp; P D Kaufman
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Release of epigenetic gene silencing by trans-acting mutations in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  O Mittelsten Scheid; K Afsar; J Paszkowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for the normal expression of two heterochromatin genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  B Y Lu; P C Emtage; B J Duyf; A J Hilliker; J C Eissenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.