Literature DB >> 24292448

Incidence of colorectal cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from a follow-up study.

C M Phelan1, J Iqbal2, H T Lynch3, J Lubinski4, J Gronwald4, P Moller5, P Ghadirian6, W D Foulkes7, S Armel8, A Eisen9, S L Neuhausen10, L Senter11, C F Singer12, P Ainsworth13, C Kim-Sing14, N Tung15, M Llacuachaqui2, G Chornokur1, S Ping2, S A Narod2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer increased susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer and to a spectrum of other cancers. There is controversy regarding the risk of colorectal cancer conferred by germline mutations in these two genes.
METHODS: We followed 7015 women with a BRCA mutation for new cases of colorectal cancer. Incidence rates in carriers were compared with population-specific incidence rates, and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were estimated. The expected numbers of cancers were computed by multiplying person-years at risk by the appropriate age-, sex- and country-specific incidence rates from the five countries.
RESULTS: Twenty-one incident colorectal cancer cases were observed among all mutation carriers, compared with 23.6 cases expected. The SIR for BRCA1 carriers was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-1.40, P=0.7) and for BRCA2 carriers was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.30-1.81, P=0.7). The SIR for colon cancer was 3.81 (95% CI 1.77-7.23) for women below the age of 50 years (both genes combined) and was 0.60 (95% CI 0.33-1.00) for women aged 50 years and above.
CONCLUSION: The risk of colorectal cancer is increased in female carriers of BRCA1 mutations below the age of 50 years but not in women with BRCA2 mutations or in older women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24292448      PMCID: PMC3899769          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer increased susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers (Wooster ; Ford ; Satagopan ; Thompson ; Antoniou ) and to a spectrum of other cancers (Struewing ; Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium, 1999; Brose ; Thompson and Easton, 2002; King ). However, the risk for colorectal cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations remains unclear. Previous studies that were designed to estimate the risk of colon cancer among mutation carriers were based on cross-sectional reviews of family histories of women with mutations and were susceptible to both selection bias and misclassification. The diagnoses of colorectal cancer were based on information provided by a family member and this approach may not always be accurate. Further, in previous studies, the mutation status of the colorectal cancer cases was unknown. We conducted a prospective study of the incidence of colorectal cancer in a cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. We followed 7105 women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation for a mean of 5.5 years. The knowledge of colorectal cancer incidence rates has important implications for genetic counsellors and their patients and for developing appropriate screening policies.

Materials and Methods

Study population

Eligible study participants were women at one of 50 centres in five countries from Canada, the United States or Europe who carry a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In most cases, genetic testing was offered initially to women who were affected either by breast or ovarian cancer. When a mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 was found in a proband or in her relative, testing was offered to other at-risk women in her family, both affected and unaffected. In some cases, mutation testing was offered directly to unaffected women when no affected family member was available for testing. The criteria for genetic testing varied from centre to centre; however, all participating facilities offered testing to both affected and unaffected women. Mutation detection was performed using a range of techniques; however, all abnormal nucleotide sequences were confirmed using direct Sanger sequencing. A woman was eligible for the study when the molecular analysis established that she was a mutation carrier. She was then asked to participate in this prospective study and to complete a baseline questionnaire. Participants were enrolled in the study from 1992 to 2010. The majority of participants completed the baseline questionnaire at the time of genetic testing or within 1 year of receiving their result. This is a dynamic cohort with ongoing accrual and, therefore, the lengths of follow-up varied from individual to individual. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire and at least one follow-up questionnaire, a minimum of 2 years following the baseline questionnaire. The baseline and follow-up questionnaires requested information regarding reproductive history, surgical history (including preventive oophorectomy and mastectomy) and all new diagnoses of cancers. All participants provided written informed consent for genetic testing and for participating in the prospective study. The ethics committees of all participating centres have approved the study. The 7021 carriers were from 3878 different families. Of the 7021 women, six had data missing on key variables (for example, date of birth, date of questionnaires, gene mutation) and were excluded, leaving 7015 women in the final analysis. An attempt was made to retrieve the pathology report for each of the incident cases of colorectal cancer. We did not have data to determine whether the diagnosis was made through clinical symptoms or screening.

Statistical analysis

Women who had a history of breast cancer were eligible for follow-up but those with a history of ovarian cancer were considered ineligible. Women were followed from the date at the baseline until the date of last questionnaire, the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, diagnosis of ovarian cancer or death from another cause. The risk of colorectal cancer in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, relative to the general population, was estimated with standardised incidence ratios (SIRs). The SIR was obtained by calculating the ratio of observed to expected number of new colorectal cancer cases, for all women combined and then separately for BRCA1 and the BRCA2 carriers. The observed and expected numbers of colorectal cancers were derived separately for carriers from each of five countries (Canada, United States, Poland, France and Norway). First, the annual age-standardised incidence rates of colorectal cancer were calculated with the count (numerator) and person–year at risk (denominator). The person–years at risk were calculated using the total number of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers multiplied with the average follow-up time in years. The person–years were subcategorised according to different countries and different age groups. The age-standardised incidence rates for each participating country were obtained from GLOBOCAN 2008 (Ferlay ). The major source of incidence rates estimated by GLOBOCAN 2008 is the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (Parkin ; Curado ). In GLOBOCAN 2008, these data are incorporated with the most recent available data from population-based cancer registries until 2002. The expected number of colorectal cancers was calculated by multiplying each age-standardised incidence rate of the country-specific general population by the observed person–years in our BRCA cohort and divided by 100 000 to get the expected numbers of colorectal cancers (indirect standardisation method). P-values were calculated under the assumption that the observed cancers are random variables with a Poisson distribution. Confidence intervals were calculated with the exact tests and all P-values were two-tailed. The SIRs were also estimated for age subgroups <50 years and ⩾50 years.

Colorectal cancer coding

GLOBOCAN 2008 has used International Classification of Disease (ICD, 10th revision) coding system to classify the cancers according to the site of origin (Suchy ). In the ICD, 10th revision, colorectal cancers are listed as ‘Colorectum (C18-21)' with the individual cancer sites coded as: C18.0-Cecum, C18.1-Appendix, C18.2-Ascending colon, C18.3-Hepatic flexure of colon, C18.4-Transverse colon, C18.5-Splenic flexure of colon, C18.6-Descending colon, C18.7-Sigmoid colon, C18.8-Overlapping lesion of colon, C18.9-Colon, NOS, C19.9-Rectosigmoid junction, C20.9-Rectum, NOS, C21.0-Anus, NOS, C21.1-Anal canal, C21.2-Cloacogenic zone, and C21.8-Overlapping lesion of rectum, anus, and anal canal. The epidemiology and risk factors of anal cancers are different from the cancers of colon and rectum; however, GLOBOCAN does not differentiate between these subtypes when estimating incidence rates. Instead, it estimates the rates for the entire region of colorectum including colon, rectum and anal canal.

Results

The 7015 women in our database of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers were followed for a mean of 5.5 years. The mean age of the cohort at study entry was 47.3 years (range, 30–74 years). A total of 5481 participants (78.13%) carried a BRCA1 mutation, 1474 (21.01%) carried a BRCA2 mutation, and 60 participants (0.8%) carried both a BRCA1 and a BRCA2 mutation. A total of 2829 women (40%) had a past history of breast cancer. We identified 21 new colorectal cancer cases among the BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers vs 23.6 colorectal cancers expected (SIR=0.89, P=0.6). Of the 21 colorectal cancer cases, 16 cases occurred in BRCA1 carriers vs 17.4 colorectal cancers expected (SIR=0.92, P=0.7) and 5 cases occurred in BRCA2 carriers vs 6.1 colorectal cancers expected (SIR=0.82, P=0.7) (Table 1). The characteristics of the 14 colorectal cases (including four cases of anal cancer) for whom a pathology report was retrieved are presented in Table 2.
Table 1

Observed and expected number of colorectal cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA carriers according to the contributing country

CountryBRCA statusNPerson–yearsRate per 100 000Observed cancersExpected cancersSIR (95% CI)P-value (two-tailed)
CanadaAll176010 49476.2389.160.87 (0.40–1.6)0.7
 BRCA11012617297.2165.131.17 (0.47–2.4)0.6
 
BRCA2
725
4222
47.37
2
3.96
0.50 (0.08–1.6)
0.3
USAAll185310 07159.5866.640.90 (0.36–1.8)0.8
 BRCA11253702756.9244.470.89 (0.28–2.1)0.8
 
BRCA2
577
2934
68.16
2
2.1
0.95 (0.16–3.1)
1
AustriaAll141704142.0410.263.85 (0.19–19)0.2
 BRCA110754800.18
 
BRCA2
20
118
847.45
1
0.07
14.29 (0.71–70.4)
0.07
PolandAll247511 71834.1344.280.93 (0.29–2.2)0.9
 BRCA1246811 59634.4944.230.94 (0.30–2.3)0.9
 
BRCA2
7
22

0
0.01


NorwayAll682516038.7624.530.44 (0.07–1.6)0.2
 BRCA1556439245.5423.760.53 (0.09–1.7)0.3
 
BRCA2
126
803

0
0.81


All countriesAll701538 64654.342123.60.89 (0.56–1.3)0.6
 BRCA1548130 191531617.370.92 (0.54–1.4)0.7
 BRCA21474820860.9656.10.82 (0.30–1.8)0.7

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; SIR=standardised incidence ratio.

Table 2

Characteristics of the incident cases of colorectal cancer in BRCA mutation carriers

Pedigree numberAgeBRCA statusTumour siteTumour pathologyTumour gradeDuke's stage
CR1973
46
BRCA1
Anal canal
Squamous cell carcinoma
Grade 2
Unk
UU2802
51
BRCA1
Colon
Adenocarcinoma
Unk
Unk
BCW141
57
BRCA1
Right colon
Adenocarcinoma
Grade 2
Duke B
BC169
48
BRCA1
Right colon
Adenocarcinoma
Grade 3
Duke C
NR1575
32
BRCA1
Left colon
Adenocarcinoma
Grade 2
Duke C
NR1353
55
BRCA1
Transverse colon
Adenocarcinoma
Grade 3
Duke C
PD121177
61
BRCA1
Unknown
Adenocarcinoma
Grade 2
Unk
PD56009
44
BRCA1
Anal canal
Squamous cell carcinoma
Unk
Unk
ED37623
65
BRCA1
Rectum
Adenocarcinoma
Grade 1
Duke C
HM1030
56
BRCA1
Anal canal
Squamous cell carcinoma
Grade 3
Unk
AUF089
62
BRCA2
Sigmoid colon
Adenocarcinoma
Grade 2
Duke B
SB42233
65
BRCA2
Transverse colon
Adenocarcinoma
Grade 2
Duke B
CLC018
77
BRCA2
Sigmoid colon
Adenocarcinoma
Grade 2
Duke A
VT972955BRCA2Anal canalSquamous cell carcinomaGrade 1Unk

Abbreviation: Unk=unknown.

The tumour characteristics for seven patients for whom a pathology report was not obtained are omitted.

The mean age of diagnosis for the cases of colorectal cancer was 56.3 years (53.5 years for the BRCA1 mutation carriers and 57.3 years for the BRCA2 mutation carriers). For women above the age of 50 years, the annual incidence rate was 46 per 100 000 per year for BRCA1 carriers and was 87 per 100 000 per year for BRCA2 carriers (Table 3). For women below the age of 50 years, the annual incidence rate was 62 per 100 000 per year for BRCA1 carriers and was 40 per 100 000 per year for BRCA2 carriers. In the subgroup analysis of BRCA1 carriers, for women aged 30–39 years, the annual incidence rate was 34.9 per 100 000 per year and for women aged 40–49 years the annual rate was 84.2 per 100 000 per year. The risk of colorectal cancer was approximately four times greater than expected for young women (aged 30–49 years) (SIR=3.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.77–7.23). The risk of early-onset colorectal cancer was significantly elevated only for BRCA1 carriers. There were eight colorectal cancers in BRCA1 carriers before the age of 50 years, the youngest occurred at the age of 32 years and the others at ages 38, 41, 43, 46, 47, 48, and 49 years. There was no evidence of an increase in the risk of colorectal cancer for women aged above 50 years (13 cancers observed, 21.5 cancers expected).
Table 3

Observed and expected number of colorectal cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers according to age groups

BRCA statusAge (years)NPerson–yearsRate per 100 000Observed cancersExpected cancersSIR (95% CI)P-value (two-tailed)
All30–49319415 46651.7382.103.81 (1.77–7.2)0.001
 
50–74
3821
23 180
56.08
13
21.50
0.60 (0.33–1)
0.05
BRCA130–49263812 84862.2781.684.76 (2.21–9)<0.001
 
50–74
2843
17 342
46.13
8
15.68
0.57 (0.28–1)
0.07
BRCA230–49554248600.39
 50–74980572287.3855.700.87 (0.32–1.9)0.8

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; SIR=standardised incidence ratio.

In addition to the 21 new cases of colorectal cancer, there were single cases of cancer of the gall bladder and bile duct. Owing to the small numbers of these cases, SIRs were not estimated. No case of stomach cancers was reported in the follow-up period.

Discussion

We have estimated the risks for cancer of the colorectum, gall bladder, bile duct, and stomach among women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation. There were only single cases of cancers of the gall bladder and bile duct (and no case of stomach cancer), and therefore it was not possible to do a formal analysis for these. In contrast, there were 21 cases of colorectal cancer; however, the incidence was not in excess of what we would have expected by chance, based on population rates for the five countries. However, the risk of early-onset colorectal cancer was significantly increased for young BRCA1 carriers. Our findings are consistent with the studies of cancers represented in the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (Thompson ), wherein the authors reported modest but significant increases in colorectal cancer risk in family members of families with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation. The relative risk associated with a BRCA1 mutation was 2.03 (RR=2.03, 95% CI 1.45–2.85, P<0.001) (Ford ). Easton and Thompson (2001) performed a comprehensive assessment of the cancer risks to BRCA2 mutation carriers in these families. Significantly increased risks in carriers were observed for cancers of the stomach (RR=2.59; 95% CI 4 1.46–4.61; P=0.012) and gall bladder and bile ducts (RR=4.97; 95% CI 41.50–16.52; P=0.03) but not for colon cancer (RR=1.43; 95% CI 0.79–2.58) or rectal cancer (RR=1.11; 95% CI 0.48–2.60) (Niell ). In a recent study, 2398 unselected patients with colorectal cancer and 4570 controls from Poland were screened for three BRCA1 founder mutations (Suchy ). A BRCA1 mutation was present in 0.42% of unselected cases of colorectal cancer and in 0.48% of controls (OR=0.8; P=0.8). In keeping with our findings, BRCA1 mutations were more common than this (0.82%) in 851 cases who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer at the age of 60 years or earlier (OR=1.7); however, this was not significant (P=0.3). In a similar study conducted in Ashkenazi Jews, Niell identified a founder mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 in 24 of 1422 colon cancer cases and in 20 of 1566 controls (OR=1.24, 95% CI=0.68–2.26). In a population-based series of 649 unselected incident cases of ovarian cancer, Risch identified 60 mutations among 515 women with invasive ovarian cancers, 39 in BRCA1 and 21 in BRCA2. The risk of colorectal cancer was increased three-fold for relatives of cases carrying a BRCA2 mutation. The risk of stomach cancer was increased six-fold among first-degree relatives of cases carrying a BRCA1 mutation, compared with relatives of non-carriers. We reported no incident case of stomach cancer in our cohort. Jakubowska observed a strong association between co-occurrence of ovarian cancer and stomach cancer in a family and the presence of a BRCA2 mutation in Poland. The increased risk of stomach cancer in BRCA2 carriers was observed predominantly in males. Bermejo conducted a large retrospective population study in Swedish families eligible for BRCA1/2 testing. A two-fold increased incidence of stomach cancer was observed; most individuals diagnosed with stomach cancer were men. The authors suggest an association of BRCA1 mutation carrier status in men with stomach cancer. Our study provides the strongest evidence to date for an increased risk of colon cancer in young women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation. The primary strength of our study is that this is a large-scale prospective study in women confirmed to carry a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation. Many previous studies used a historical cohort design, whereby genetic testing took place after the diagnoses of the incident cancers. Historical cohort studies are subject to bias because women who experience the end point of interest (colon, rectal and stomach cancer) may be more (or less) likely to undergo testing than healthy women because of local genetic testing criteria or high mortality. Our study has a number of limitations pertaining to both the estimation of the incidence and overall survival. Our cohort study includes only women and, therefore, we cannot estimate the incidence of colorectal cancer in males. The number of incident cases was relatively small (n=21) and this limits the precision of the risk estimates, especially for subgroup analyses. We were able to retrieve a pathology report or a medical record on 14 of the cases (66.6%) and the remainder (n=7) were based on personal reporting. It is possible therefore that some of these seven were misclassified. We observed four cases of anal cancer in this study, three in BRCA1 carriers and one in a BRCA2 carrier. Anal cancer is a very rare malignancy in the United States with an incidence rate of 1.7 per 100 000 (Howlader ). Based on the US rates, we expected to see 1.3 cases of anal cancer in the study (SIR 3.03, P=0.05). The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends general population screening for colorectal cancer using high-sensitivity fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy beginning at the age of 50 years and continuing until the age of 75 years (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, 2008). However, they recommend that people at higher risk of developing colorectal cancer should begin screening at a younger age and may need to be tested more frequently. Based on the results reported here, we recommend screening for colorectal cancer for women with a BRCA1 mutation be initiated at an age of 40 years. There are insufficient data to make a recommendation for BRCA2 carriers that is different from those of the general population.
  16 in total

1.  The lifetime risks of breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  J M Satagopan; K Offit; W Foulkes; M E Robson; S Wacholder; C M Eng; S E Karp; C B Begg
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  J P Struewing; P Hartge; S Wacholder; S M Baker; M Berlin; M McAdams; M M Timmerman; L C Brody; M A Tucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-08-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Variation in cancer risks, by mutation position, in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  D Thompson; D Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Deborah Thompson; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Cancer risk estimates for BRCA1 mutation carriers identified in a risk evaluation program.

Authors:  Marcia S Brose; Timothy R Rebbeck; Kathleen A Calzone; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Contribution of the Defective BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 Genes to the Familial Aggregation of Breast Cancer: a Simulation Study Based on the Swedish Family-Cancer Database.

Authors:  Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Alfonso García Pérez; Kari Hemminki
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.857

9.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Bethany L Niell; Gad Rennert; Joseph D Bonner; Ronit Almog; Lynn P Tomsho; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A high frequency of BRCA2 gene mutations in Polish families with ovarian and stomach cancer.

Authors:  Anna Jakubowska; Rodney Scott; Janusz Menkiszak; Jacek Gronwald; Tomasz Byrski; Tomasz Huzarski; Bohdan Górski; Cezary Cybulski; Tadeusz Debniak; Elzbieta Kowalska; Teresa Starzyńska; Małgorzata Ławniczak; Steven Narod; Jan Lubinski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Causes and consequences of microsatellite instability in gastric carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sérgia Velho; Maria Sofia Fernandes; Marina Leite; Ceu Figueiredo; Raquel Seruca
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Alternative splicing of DNA damage response genes and gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Bahityar Rahmutulla; Kazuyuki Matsushita; Fumio Nomura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Response to Yang, Shi, Wang et al.

Authors:  Mok Oh; Ali McBride; Seongseok Yun; Sandipan Bhattacharjee; Marion Slack; Jennifer R Martin; Joanne Jeter; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  BRCA1 expression serves a role in vincristine resistance in colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Zhongjie Xu; Lirong Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Fetal growth and subsequent maternal risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Casey Crump; Jan Sundquist; Weiva Sieh; Marilyn A Winkleby; Kristina Sundquist
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Increased risk of colorectal polyps in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease undergoing liver transplant evaluation.

Authors:  Birju D Bhatt; Thresiamma Lukose; Abby B Siegel; Robert S Brown; Elizabeth C Verna
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10

7.  Cancer Incidence in First- and Second-Degree Relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Haley Streff; Jessica Profato; Yuanqing Ye; Denise Nebgen; Susan K Peterson; Claire Singletary; Banu K Arun; Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-06-15

8.  Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew B Yurgelun; Matthew H Kulke; Charles S Fuchs; Brian A Allen; Hajime Uno; Jason L Hornick; Chinedu I Ukaegbu; Lauren K Brais; Philip G McNamara; Robert J Mayer; Deborah Schrag; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Kimmie Ng; John Kidd; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Richard J Wenstrup; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Germline Analysis from Tumor-Germline Sequencing Dyads to Identify Clinically Actionable Secondary Findings.

Authors:  Bryce A Seifert; Julianne M O'Daniel; Krunal Amin; Daniel S Marchuk; Nirali M Patel; Joel S Parker; Alan P Hoyle; Lisle E Mose; Andrew Marron; Michele C Hayward; Christopher Bizon; Kirk C Wilhelmsen; James P Evans; H Shelton Earp; Norman E Sharpless; D Neil Hayes; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  COEXPEDIA: exploring biomedical hypotheses via co-expressions associated with medical subject headings (MeSH).

Authors:  Sunmo Yang; Chan Yeong Kim; Sohyun Hwang; Eiru Kim; Hyojin Kim; Hongseok Shim; Insuk Lee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.