Literature DB >> 24292157

End-of-life care and achieving preferences for place of death in England: results of a population-based survey using the VOICES-SF questionnaire.

Katherine J Hunt1, Natalie Shlomo, Julia Addington-Hall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Health policy places emphasis on enabling patients to die in their place of choice, and increasing the proportion of home deaths. In this article, we seek to explore reported preferences for place of death and experiences of care in a population-based sample of deaths from all causes.
DESIGN: Self-completion post-bereavement survey. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Census of deaths registered in two health districts between October 2009 and April 2010. Views of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services Short Form was sent to each informant (n = 1422; usually bereaved relative) 6-12 months post-bereavement.
RESULTS: Response was 33%. In all, 35.7% of respondents reported that the deceased said where they wanted to die, and 49.3% of these were reported to achieve this. Whilist 73.9% of those who were reported to have a preference cited home as the preferred place, only 13.3% of the sample died at home. Cancer patients were more likely to be reported to achieve preferences than patients with other conditions (p < .01). Being reported to have a record of preferences for place of death increased the likelihood of dying at home (odds ratio = 22.10). When rating care in the last 2 days, respondents were more likely to rate 'excellent' or 'good' for nursing care (p < .01), relief of pain (p < .01) and other symptoms (p < .01), emotional support (p < .01) and privacy of patient's environment (p < .01) if their relative died in their preferred place.
CONCLUSIONS: More work is needed to encourage people to talk about their preferences at the end of life: this should not be restricted to those known to be dying. Increasing knowledge and achievement of preferences for place of death may also improve end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bereavement; health survey; palliative care; questionnaire; terminal care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24292157     DOI: 10.1177/0269216313512012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  24 in total

Review 1.  Palliative Care for Parkinson's Spectrum Disorders: an Emerging Approach.

Authors:  Maya Katz
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Impact of Palliative Medicine Involvement on End-of-Life Services for Patients With Cancer With In-Hospital Deaths.

Authors:  Alison Wiesenthal; Debra A Goldman; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  How well is palliative care integrated into cancer care? A MASCC, ESMO, and EAPC Project.

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Florian Strasser; Nathan Cherny
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Family perceptions of care at the end of life in UK nursing care homes.

Authors:  Julie Kinley; Jo Hockley; Louisa Stone; Kevin Brazil
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2018-02-15

5.  Nursing care at end of life: a UK-based survey of the deaths of people living in care settings for people with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Ruth Northway; Stuart Todd; Katherine Hunt; Paula Hopes; Rachel Morgan; Julia Shearn; Rhian Worth; Jane Bernal
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2018-07-03

6.  Factors related to satisfaction of cancer patients with transfer arrangements made by university hospitals at the end-of-life in Japan: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of bereaved family members.

Authors:  Hiroko Ishimoto; Tokunori Ikeda; Yasuhiro Kadooka
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Family Caregiving and Place of Death: Insights From Cross-national Analysis of the Harmonized End-of-Life Data.

Authors:  Jennifer Ailshire; Margarita Osuna; Jenny Wilkens; Jinkook Lee
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Patient and carer experiences of clinical uncertainty and deterioration, in the face of limited reversibility: A comparative observational study of the AMBER care bundle.

Authors:  Katherine Bristowe; Irene Carey; Adrian Hopper; Susanna Shouls; Wendy Prentice; Ruth Caulkin; Irene J Higginson; Jonathan Koffman
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.762

9.  Palliative and end-of-life care in glioblastoma: defining and measuring opportunities to improve care.

Authors:  Lauryn E Hemminger; Christine A Pittman; David N Korones; Jennifer N Serventi; Susan Ladwig; Robert G Holloway; Nimish A Mohile
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2016-09-27

10.  Is dying in hospital better than home in incurable cancer and what factors influence this? A population-based study.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Natalia Calanzani; Jonathan Koffman; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.