Literature DB >> 33057817

Factors related to satisfaction of cancer patients with transfer arrangements made by university hospitals at the end-of-life in Japan: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of bereaved family members.

Hiroko Ishimoto1, Tokunori Ikeda2,3, Yasuhiro Kadooka4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer patients in university hospitals often face a difficult decision regarding transfer to other care settings at the end-of-life. Arrangements for a satisfying transfer are important for reducing the psychosocial impact of the transition, but few studies have evaluated this aspect. This study aimed to identify factors related to the satisfying arrangement of transfers to other care settings from university hospitals.
METHODS: A total of 400 bereaved family members of cancer patients in Japan participated in this cross-sectional web-based questionnaire survey. Statistical methods including decision tree analysis were conducted to identify factors significantly associated with satisfying transfer arrangements.
RESULTS: More than 60% of cancer patients were satisfied with the transfer arrangements made by university hospitals. Decision tree analysis revealed that the factor most significantly associated with satisfaction with transfer arrangements was "satisfaction with contents of the explanation about transfer." The following significant factors were also extracted: "timing of being informed of transfer," "presence of primary care physician," and "presence of trustworthy staff." "Satisfaction with overall care from university hospital staff" and "involvement of palliative care team" were identified as factors contributing to a high degree of satisfaction with transfer arrangements.
CONCLUSION: In order to make satisfying transfer arrangements from university hospitals for cancer patients at the end-of-life, healthcare professionals should provide satisfactory explanations about the transfer process in order to meet the information needs of patients. To be effective, healthcare professionals should initiate transfer arrangements prior to cancer treatment, while simultaneously building trusting relationships with patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer patient; End-of-life; Transfer arrangement; University hospital

Year:  2020        PMID: 33057817     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05822-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  19 in total

1.  Cancer patients' satisfaction with doctors and preferences about death in a university hospital in Turkey.

Authors:  Raika Durusoy; Burcak Karaca; Bermeth Junushova; Ruchan Uslu
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-15

Review 2.  Inpatient transfer to a care home for end-of-life care: What are the views and experiences of patients and their relatives? A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the UK literature.

Authors:  Tabitha Thomas; Isla Kuhn; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Transition journey from hospital to home in patients with cancer and their caregivers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Wei How Darryl Ang; Siew Ping Lang; Emily Ang; Violeta Lopez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  A survey of the perspectives of patients who are seriously ill regarding end-of-life decisions in some medical institutions of Korea, China and Japan.

Authors:  Kwon Ivo; Koh Younsuck; Yun Young Ho; Suh Sang-Yeon; Heo Dae Seog; Bae Hyunah; Hattori Kenji; Zhai Xiaomei
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  The transition experience of rural older persons with advanced cancer and their families: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Wendy D Duggleby; Kelly L Penz; Donna M Goodridge; Donna M Wilson; Beverly D Leipert; Patricia H Berry; Sylvia R Keall; Christopher J Justice
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Framework for timing of the discussion about forgoing cancer-specific treatment based on a qualitative study with oncologists.

Authors:  K Laryionava; P Heußner; W Hiddemann; E C Winkler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Why Taiwanese hospice patients want to stay in hospital: health-care professionals' beliefs and solutions.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Hu; Tai-Yuan Chiu; Yih-Ru Cheng; Rong-Bin Chuang; Ching-Yu Chen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  'I wish I knew more ...' the end-of-life planning and information needs for end-stage fibrotic interstitial lung disease: views of patients, carers and health professionals.

Authors:  Sabrina Bajwah; Jonathan Koffman; Irene J Higginson; Joy R Ross; Athol U Wells; Surinder S Birring; Julia Riley
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.568

9.  Truth Telling and Treatment Strategies in End-of-Life Care in Physician-Led Accountable Care Organizations: Discrepancies Between Patients' Preferences and Physicians' Perceptions.

Authors:  Hsien-Liang Huang; Shao-Yi Cheng; Chien-An Yao; Wen-Yu Hu; Ching-Yu Chen; Tai-Yuan Chiu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Perspectives of bereaved relatives of patients with haematological malignancies concerning preferred place of care and death: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Dorothy McCaughan; Eve Roman; Alexandra G Smith; Anne C Garry; Miriam J Johnson; Russell D Patmore; Martin R Howard; Debra A Howell
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.762

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.