Literature DB >> 24291783

Dynamics of vessel wall changes following the implantation of the absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months.

Patrick W Serruys1, Yoshinobu Onuma, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Takashi Muramatsu, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Bernard de Bruyne, Dariusz Dudek, Leif Thuesen, Pieter C Smits, Bernard Chevalier, Dougal McClean, Jacques Koolen, Stephan Windecker, Robert Whitbourn, Ian Meredith, Cecile Dorange, Susan Veldhof, Karine Miquel Hebert, Richard Rapoza, John A Ormiston.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess observations with multimodality imaging of the Absorb bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold performed in two consecutive cohorts of patients who were serially investigated either at 6 and 24 months or at 12 and 36 months. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In the ABSORB multicentre single-arm trial, 45 patients (cohort B1) and 56 patients (cohort B2) underwent serial invasive imaging, specifically quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), radiofrequency backscattering (IVUS-VH) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Between one and three years, late luminal loss remained unchanged (6 months: 0.19 mm, 1 year: 0.27 mm, 2 years: 0.27 mm, 3 years: 0.29 mm) and the in-segment angiographic restenosis rate for the entire cohort B (n=101) at three years was 6%. On IVUS, mean lumen, scaffold, plaque and vessel area showed enlargement up to two years. Mean lumen and scaffold area remained stable between two and three years whereas significant reduction in plaque behind the struts occurred with a trend toward adaptive restrictive remodelling of EEM. Hyperechogenicity of the vessel wall, a surrogate of the bioresorption process, decreased from 23.1% to 10.4% with a reduction of radiofrequency backscattering for dense calcium and necrotic core. At three years, the count of strut cores detected on OCT increased significantly, probably reflecting the dismantling of the scaffold; 98% of struts were covered. In the entire cohort B (n=101), the three-year major adverse cardiac event rate was 10.0% without any scaffold thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The current investigation demonstrated the dynamics of vessel wall changes after implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold, resulting at three years in stable luminal dimensions, a low restenosis rate and a low clinical major adverse cardiac events rate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00856856.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24291783     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I11A217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  38 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Technologies in Flow Diverters and Stents for Cerebrovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Michael Karsy; Jian Guan; Andrea A Brock; Anubhav Amin; Min S Park
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Neointimal coverage and late apposition of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted in the acute phase of myocardial infarction: OCT data from the PRAGUE-19 study.

Authors:  Petr Toušek; Viktor Kočka; Martin Malý; Libor Lisa; Tomáš Buděšínský; Petr Widimský
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Causes, assessment, and treatment of stent thrombosis--intravascular imaging insights.

Authors:  Daniel S Ong; Ik-Kyung Jang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Evidences in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Bhargav Dave
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

5.  Three-year follow-up optical coherence tomography of under-expanded drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis treated with ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold following ultra-high pressure pre-dilatation.

Authors:  Michael Liang; Huay-Cheem Tan; Adrian F Low
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2017-11-10

6.  Overlapping meta-analyses of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents: bringing clarity or confusion?

Authors:  Davide Capodanno
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Bioresorbable scaffold-the holy grail of percutaneous coronary intervention: fact or myth?

Authors:  Kevin Liou; Nigel Jepson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - basic concepts and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Bioresorbable Polymers and Stent Devices.

Authors:  Payam Dehghani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-02

10.  Very late bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis at 25 months post implantation.

Authors:  Koo Hui Chan; Swee-Chong Seow; Huay Cheem Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.