Literature DB >> 24290889

Cytogenetic endpoints and Xenobiotic gene polymorphism in lymphocytes of hospital workers chronically exposed to ionizing radiation in Cardiology, Radiology and Orthopedic Laboratories.

Balachandar Vellingiri1, Sureshkumar Shanmugam2, Mohana Devi Subramaniam2, Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian2, Arun Meyyazhagan2, Karthickkumar Alagamuthu2, Varsha Prakash2, Mustaqahammed Shafiahammedkhan2, Sankar Kathannan2, Manikantan Pappuswamy2, Banu Raviganesh3, Sheelapriyadharshinee Anand4, Dharwadkar Shahnaz N5, Ssang-Goo Cho6, Sasikala Keshavarao2.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation (IR) is known as a classical mutagen capable of inducing various kinds of stable and unstable chromosomal aberrations (CA) including the possibility of increasing the incidence of DNA damage. This study aims to assess occupationally induced CA in workers chronically exposed to low doses of IR in Radiology (RL), Cardiology (CL) and Orthopedic (OL) Laboratories in hospitals of Tamil Nadu. We performed the analysis of CA by trypsin G-banding, micronucleus (MN) assay, Comet assay and Xenobiotic-metabolizing gene polymorphisms (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) in 56 exposed and 56 control subjects who were matched for gender and age (± 2 years). Higher degree of CA and MN frequencies were observed in exposed groups, especially in CL subjects compared to other exposed groups and controls (p<0.05). Higher frequency of DNA tail length and tail moment was observed in the CL exposed subjects compared to the RL and OL subjects. The frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were 39.3 percent and 14.3 percent, respectively. No significant difference in allele frequencies between exposed subjects and controls were observed (p=0.0128). Using multiple linear regression analysis, statistical significance was determined for work duration and age for the CL, RL and OL workers and the examination of the possible impact by confounding factors showed few significant influences on the radiation exposure, as a specific biomarker. However, the findings from the present study suggest that, awareness should be created among the personnel exposed to radiations in hospital laboratories, highlighting the necessity of applying radiation protection principles against medical radiation exposure.
© 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal alterations (CA); Comet assay; Hospital workers; Ionizing radiation (IR); Micronucleus assay (MN); Xenobiotic metabolizing genes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24290889     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  5 in total

1.  Effects of ionising radiation on micronucleus formation and chromosomal aberrations in Chinese radiation workers.

Authors:  Qing-Zeng Qian; Xiang-Ke Cao; Fu-Hai Shen; Qian Wang
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Dependence of micronuclei assay on the depth of absorbed dose.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Abtahi; Seyed Mahmoud Reza Aghamiri; Masoumeh Yadolahi; Aziz Mahmoudzadeh
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-09-17

3.  Radioprotective efficacy of plastic polymer against the toxicogenomic effects of radiopharmaceutical 18F-FDG on human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Nilson Benedito Lopes; Igor Vivian Almeida; Pedro Henrique Silvestre Lopes; Veronica Elisa Pimenta Vicentini
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 4.  Understanding the Role of the Transcription Factor Sp1 in Ovarian Cancer: from Theory to Practice.

Authors:  Balachandar Vellingiri; Mahalaxmi Iyer; Mohana Devi Subramaniam; Kaavya Jayaramayya; Zothan Siama; Bupesh Giridharan; Arul Narayanasamy; Ahmed Abdal Dayem; Ssang-Goo Cho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Telomere fragility in radiology workers occupationally exposed to low doses of ionising radiation.

Authors:  Jelena Filipović Tričković; Ana Valenta Šobot; Ivana Joksić; Gordana Joksić
Journal:  Arh Hig Rada Toksikol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.078

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.