Literature DB >> 24290720

Analysis of the musculoskeletal loading of the thumb during pipetting--a pilot study.

John Z Wu1, Erik W Sinsel2, Justin F Shroyer2, Christopher M Warren2, Daniel E Welcome2, Kristin D Zhao3, Kai-Nan An3, Frank L Buczek2.   

Abstract

Previous epidemiological studies indicate that the use of thumb-push mechanical pipettes is associated with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in the hand. The goal of the current study was to analyze the loading in the muscle-tendon units in the thumb during pipetting. The hand is modeled as a multi-body linkage system and includes four fingers (index, long, ring, and little finger), a thumb, and a palm segment. Since the current study is focused on the thumb, the model includes only nine muscles attached to the thumb via tendons. The time-histories of joint angles and push force at the pipette plunger during pipetting were determined experimentally and used as model input; whereas forces in the muscle-tendon units in the thumb were calculated via an inverse dynamic approach combined with an optimization procedure. Results indicate that all nine muscles have force outputs during pipetting, and the maximal force was in the abductor pollicis brevis (APB). The ratio of the mean peak muscle force to the mean peak push force during the dispensing cycle was approximately 2.3, which is comparable to values observed in grasping tasks in the literature. The analysis method and results in the current study provide a mechanistic understanding of MSD risk factors associated with pipetting, and may be useful in guiding ergonomic designs for manual pipettes. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inverse dynamics; Modeling; Muscle–tendon force; Pipette; Thumb

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24290720      PMCID: PMC4782592          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  27 in total

1.  In-vivo function of the thumb muscles.

Authors:  K R Kaufman; K N An; W J Litchy; W P Cooney; E Y Chao
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Muscle recruitment by the min/max criterion -- a comparative numerical study.

Authors:  J Rasmussen; M Damsgaard; M Voigt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Activation patterns of the thumb muscles during stable and unstable pinch tasks.

Authors:  M E Johanson; F J Valero-Cuevas; V R Hentz
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; M Elise Johanson; Joseph D Towles
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Inverse dynamic analysis of the biomechanics of the thumb while pipetting: a case study.

Authors:  John Z Wu; Erik W Sinsel; Daniel S Gloekler; Bryan M Wimer; Kristin D Zhao; Kai-Nan An; Frank L Buczek
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Modeling of the muscle/tendon excursions and moment arms in the thumb using the commercial software anybody.

Authors:  John Z Wu; Kai-Nan An; Robert G Cutlip; Michael E Andrew; Ren G Dong
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-01-04       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Jar-opening challenges. Part 2: estimating the force-generating capacity of thumb muscles in healthy young adults during jar-opening tasks.

Authors:  L C Kuo; J H Chang; C F Lin; H Y Hsu; K Y Ho; F C Su
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.617

8.  Kinematic performance of a six degree-of-freedom hand model (6DHand) for use in occupational biomechanics.

Authors:  Frank L Buczek; Erik W Sinsel; Daniel S Gloekler; Bryan M Wimer; Christopher M Warren; John Z Wu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Effect of object width on muscle and joint forces during thumb-index finger grasping.

Authors:  Laurent Vigouroux; Mathieu Domalain; Eric Berton
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.833

Review 10.  Tendinitis and tendinosis of the elbow, wrist, and hands.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Wainstein; Tracy E Nailor
Journal:  Clin Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006
View more
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of the Constraint Joint Loading in the Thumb During Pipetting.

Authors:  John Z Wu; Erik W Sinsel; Kristin D Zhao; Kai-Nan An; Frank L Buczek
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Biomechanical Analysis of Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear Kinematics.

Authors:  Charles C Lin; Nilay A Patel; Yasuo Itami; Michelle H McGarry; Steven S Shin; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-08-20

3.  Semi-automation of process analytics reduces operator effect.

Authors:  A Christler; E Felföldi; M Mosor; D Sauer; N Walch; A Dürauer; A Jungbauer
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Stress-Related Responses to Alternations between Repetitive Physical Work and Cognitive Tasks of Different Difficulties.

Authors:  Susanna Mixter; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Petra Lindfors; Kent Dimberg; Helena Jahncke; Eugene Lyskov; David M Hallman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Fatigue, Stress, and Performance during Alternating Physical and Cognitive Tasks-Effects of the Temporal Pattern of Alternations.

Authors:  Susanna Mixter; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Sofie Bjärntoft; Petra Lindfors; Eugene Lyskov; David M Hallman
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.179

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.