Literature DB >> 24289883

Prediction models of prevalent radiographic vertebral fractures among older men.

John T Schousboe1, Harold R Rosen2, Tamara J Vokes3, Jane A Cauley4, Steven R Cummings5, Michael C Nevitt6, Dennis M Black6, Eric S Orwoll7, Deborah M Kado8, Kristine E Ensrud9.   

Abstract

No studies have compared how well different prediction models discriminate older men who have a radiographic prevalent vertebral fracture (PVFx) from those who do not. We used area under receiver operating characteristic curves and a net reclassification index to compare how well regression-derived prediction models and nonregression prediction tools identify PVFx among men age ≥65 yr with femoral neck T-score of -1.0 or less enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. The area under receiver operating characteristic for a model with age, bone mineral density, and historical height loss (HHL) was 0.682 compared with 0.692 for a complex model with age, bone mineral density, HHL, prior non-spine fracture, body mass index, back pain, grip strength, smoking, and glucocorticoid use (p values for difference in 5 bootstrapped samples 0.14-0.92). This complex model, using a cutpoint prevalence of 5%, correctly reclassified only a net 5.7% (p = 0.13) of men as having or not having a PVFx compared with a simple criteria list (age ≥ 80 yr, HHL >4 cm, or glucocorticoid use). In conclusion, simple criteria identify older men with PVFx and regression-based models. Future research to identify additional risk factors that more accurately identify older men with PVFx is needed.
Copyright © 2014 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone densitometry; model discrimination; prediction models; prevalent vertebral fracture; vertebral fracture assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24289883      PMCID: PMC4035457          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  40 in total

1.  Vertebral fracture prevalence among women screened for the Fracture Intervention Trial and a simple clinical tool to screen for undiagnosed vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  T M Vogt; P D Ross; L Palermo; T Musliner; H K Genant; D Black; D E Thompson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Ascertainment of risk factors for osteoporosis: comparison of interview data with medical record review.

Authors:  C M Beard; L J Melton; S L Cedel; L S Richelson; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Prevalence and risk factors of radiographic vertebral fractures in elderly Chinese men and women: results of Mr. OS (Hong Kong) and Ms. OS (Hong Kong) studies.

Authors:  A W L Kwok; J-S Gong; Y-X J Wang; J C S Leung; T Kwok; J F Griffith; P C Leung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Accuracy of the Jamar dynamometer.

Authors:  R Härkönen; R Harju; H Alaranta
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.950

5.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Y Wu; C van Kuijk; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Risk factors for incident vertebral fractures in men and women: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Marjolein van der Klift; Chris E D H de Laet; Eugene V McCloskey; Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Albert Hofman; Huibert A P Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Clinical utility of dual-energy vertebral assessment (DVA).

Authors:  Tamara J Vokes; Larry B Dixon; Murray J Favus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The prevalence of vertebral deformity in european men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  T W O'Neill; D Felsenberg; J Varlow; C Cooper; J A Kanis; A J Silman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas; L Palermo; M Nevitt; R S Valentin; D Black; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Spinal radiographs in those with back pain-when are they appropriate to diagnose vertebral fractures?

Authors:  E M Clark; S R Cummings; J T Schousboe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Physical performance and radiographic and clinical vertebral fractures in older men.

Authors:  Peggy M Cawthon; Terri L Blackwell; Lynn M Marshall; Howard A Fink; Deborah M Kado; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Dennis Black; Eric S Orwoll; Steven R Cummings; John T Schousboe
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Vertebral Fracture Identification as Part of a Comprehensive Risk Assessment in Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  John T Schousboe
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Kyphosis and paraspinal muscle composition in older men: a cross-sectional study for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) research group.

Authors:  Wendy B Katzman; Dana Miller-Martinez; Lynn M Marshall; Nancy E Lane; Deborah M Kado
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.