| Literature DB >> 24289883 |
John T Schousboe1, Harold R Rosen2, Tamara J Vokes3, Jane A Cauley4, Steven R Cummings5, Michael C Nevitt6, Dennis M Black6, Eric S Orwoll7, Deborah M Kado8, Kristine E Ensrud9.
Abstract
No studies have compared how well different prediction models discriminate older men who have a radiographic prevalent vertebral fracture (PVFx) from those who do not. We used area under receiver operating characteristic curves and a net reclassification index to compare how well regression-derived prediction models and nonregression prediction tools identify PVFx among men age ≥65 yr with femoral neck T-score of -1.0 or less enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. The area under receiver operating characteristic for a model with age, bone mineral density, and historical height loss (HHL) was 0.682 compared with 0.692 for a complex model with age, bone mineral density, HHL, prior non-spine fracture, body mass index, back pain, grip strength, smoking, and glucocorticoid use (p values for difference in 5 bootstrapped samples 0.14-0.92). This complex model, using a cutpoint prevalence of 5%, correctly reclassified only a net 5.7% (p = 0.13) of men as having or not having a PVFx compared with a simple criteria list (age ≥ 80 yr, HHL >4 cm, or glucocorticoid use). In conclusion, simple criteria identify older men with PVFx and regression-based models. Future research to identify additional risk factors that more accurately identify older men with PVFx is needed.Entities:
Keywords: Bone densitometry; model discrimination; prediction models; prevalent vertebral fracture; vertebral fracture assessment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24289883 PMCID: PMC4035457 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.09.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Densitom ISSN: 1094-6950 Impact factor: 2.617