Literature DB >> 24287912

Design, synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of o-carboxamido stilbene analogues.

Mohamad Nurul Azmi1, Mohd Fadzli Md Din, Chin Hui Kee, Munirah Suhaimi, Ang Kheng Ping, Kartini Ahmad, Mohd Azlan Nafiah, Noel F Thomas, Khalit Mohamad, Leong Kok Hoong, Khalijah Awang.   

Abstract

Resveratrol, a natural stilbene found in grapes and wines exhibits a wide range of pharmacological properties. Resveratrol is also known as a good chemopreventive agent for inhibiting carcinogenesis processes that target kinases, cyclooxygenases, ribonucleotide reductase and DNA polymerases. A total of 19 analogues with an amide moiety were synthesized and the cytotoxic effects of the analogues on a series of human cancer cell lines are reported. Three compounds 6d, 6i and 6n showed potent cytotoxicity against prostate cancer DU-145 (IC50=16.68 µM), colon cancer HT-29 (IC50=7.51 µM) and breast cancer MCF-7 (IC50=21.24 µM), respectively, which are comparable with vinblastine. The resveratrol analogues were synthesized using the Heck method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24287912      PMCID: PMC3876051          DOI: 10.3390/ijms141223369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


Introduction

Resveratrol, a popular stilbenoid-type compound exerts a wide range of biological activities, such as anti-carcinogenic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor [1,2]. Resveratrol is widely found in grapes and red wine [3,4], and the amount of resveratrol in the skin of fresh grape is between 50–100 mg/g [5]. Resveratrol, a resorcinol derivative was first isolated from the Japanese plant Veratrum grandiflorum [6] and was reported as a phytoalexin produced by plants in response to pathogen attack or environmental pressure such as injuries [7]. Resveratrol is also known as a calorie restriction mimetic which is a hypothetical class of drugs that would mimic the substantial anti-aging effects caloric restrictions [8]. Resveratrol is commonly connected to the French Paradox i.e., wine-drinking population with high intake of saturated fat but with few heart related problems, which is attributed to the inhibition of LDL oxidation in human [9]. In relation to cardiovascular disease, an animal model showed that resveratrol reduces blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy in hypertensive animals as well as protects the heart from ischemia-reperfusion injury and slows the progression of atherosclerosis [10]. The interesting and intriguing biological properties of resveratrol have attracted much attention from synthetic chemists which led to the synthesis of numerous analogues containing diverse range of functional groups. For instance, pterostilbene which is a simple analogue with two methoxyl groups on the aromatic ring have been shown to exhibit good cytotoxicity against estrogen-insensitive breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) [11]. Some naphthyl combretastatin analogues have been reported to inhibit tubulin polymerization [12]. Similar to the naphthalene moiety, stilbene coumarin analogues showed potent antiproliferative activity toward human lung carcinoma cell line (H460) [2]. By substituting the hydroxyl group in resveratrol with an aliphatic acid, positive result was seen in inhibiting cell apoptosis through Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) [13]. Another type of analogue, the benzenesulfonamides having a sulfonamide moiety, were tested against 60 human tumor cell lines and were notably cytotoxic toward BT-549 breast cancer and HT-29 colon cancer [14]. Previously our group has synthesized a nine o-carboxamido stilbene, incorporating the amide moiety and exhibiting good biological activity against a colon cell line (HT-29), liver cell line (HEP-G2), Jurkat cell and murine leukemic cell line [15-17]. In continuation of this study, we have further synthesized more analogues and all these compounds were evaluated for their cytotoxicity against 6 human cell lines; colon cancer (HT-29), estrogen-sensitive breast cancer (MCF-7), estrogen-insensitive breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), prostate cancer (DU-145), pancreatic cancer (BxPC-3) and normal pancreatic cells (hTERT-HPNE). A total of 19 o-carboxamido stilbenes were synthesized (6a–6s) containing different substituted groups linked to the amide group at ring A (Scheme 1). While at ring B, electron donating groups such as methoxy and electron withdrawing group (Cl, Br and F) were attached at different positions.
Scheme 1.

Chemical structures of o-carboxamido stilbene analogues mentioned in this study and general structure of the synthesized compounds (6a–6s).

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of o-Carboxamido Stilbene

The synthesis of o-carboxamido stilbenes have been described in Scheme 2. Substituted benzaldehydes 2a–2d were reacted with methyltriphenylphosphoniumiodide in the presence of tert-BuOK in a Wittig reaction [16] to provide the styrene derivatives 3f–3h and 3k; styrene 3a–3e, 3i and 3j were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and were used without further purification. Iodo carboxamido was prepared in two ways (a) 2-iodoaniline was reacted with NaH and then acetic anhydride was added to give 2-iodoacetamide 5a; (b) A cooled solution (0–5 °C) of 2-iodoaniline and triethylamine, was added with acyl chloride to give 5b–5f[18]. The iodo carboxamido 5a–5f were coupled with the styrenes 3a–3k using the Heck method by palladium (II) acetate catalyst to provide the (E) o-carboxamido stilbenes 6a–6s in good yield [16,17].
Scheme 2.

Synthesis of substituted styrenes by Wittig olefination, o-carboxamido stilbenes by Heck coupling reaction. Reagents and conditions. (i) H3CP(C6H5)3Br, tert-BuOK, THF, 24 h, −75 °C; (iia) NaH, acetic anhydride, DMF or (iib) triethylamine (Et3N) (0–5 °C), THF, acyl chloride; (iii) triethylamine (Et3N), Pd(II) acetate, 120 °C.

Cytotoxic Evaluation of o-Carboxamido Stilbenes on Selected Human Cancer Cell Lines

Resveratrol, a stilbene with antioxidant and antiproliferative properties, has been shown to inhibit a variety of primary tumors. However, the inhibitory effect is observed only at higher concentration [19,20]. In our effort to improve the cytotoxicity of resveratrol, a total of 19 resveratrol analogues bearing the o-carboxamido moiety were synthesized. These analogues together with 3 standards (cisplatin, resveratrol and vinblastine) were screened against 5 human cancer cell lines and one normal human cell line. Of the 19 analogues, 7 (6d, 6e, 6g–6i, 6k and 6s) were found to be cytotoxic toward colon cancer cell lines (HT-29), 7 (6a, 6d, 6i, 6l, 6n, 6p and 6s) toward estrogen-sensitive breast cancer (MCF-7), none towards estrogen-insensitive breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), 6 (6d, 6i–6l and 6p) toward prostate cancer (DU-145), 2 (6d and 6s) toward pancreatic cancer (BxPC-3) and none towards normal immortalized pancreatic cells (hTERT-HPNE). Analogue 6d showed cytotoxicity towards almost all cancer cell lines tested except for MDA-MB-231 (Table 1). Dose-response curves of the selected cytotoxic analogues toward HT-29, MCF-7, Bx-PC-3 and DU-145 are shown in Figure 1.
Table 1.

Cytotoxic evaluation of o-carboxamido stilbenes on human cancer cell lines.

EntryIC50/μM (n = 3)

HT-29MCF-7Bx-PC-3DU-145
Vinblastin (Positive control)4.40 ± 2.7021.00 ± 2.3333.04 ± 2.1420.31 ± 7.76
Cisplatin (Positive control)30.61 ± 2.3455.04 ± 5.2571.54 ± 5.3622.68 ± 1.14
Resveratrol (Control)72.9 ± 2.485.71 ± 1.7071.85 ± 1.55107.92 ± 1.57
6a>20097.00 ± 4.79>200>200
6b>200>200>200>200
6c>200>200>200>200
6d11.40 ± 7.3532.52 ± 5.16129.78 ± 4.3616.68 ± 1.86
6e15.92 ± 3.85>200>200>200
6f>200>200>200>200
6g11.06 ± 0.27>200>200>200
6h18.62 ± 0.56>200>200>200
6i7.51 ± 0.5353.32 ± 5.63>20029.19 ± 1.44
6j>200>200>20042.25 ± 2.02
6k15.60 ± 2.10>200>20056.83 ± 2.37
6l>200115.83 ± 2.90>20092.79 ± 4.85
6m>200>200>200>200
6n>20021.24 ± 1.01>200>200
6o>200>200>200>200
6p>200128.16 ± 7.58>20067.89 ± 3.97
6q>200>200>200>200
6r>200>200>200>200
6s29.11 ± 2.7352.04 ± 7.6266.30 ± 1.14>200
Figure 1.

Dose-response curves of selected o-carboxamido stilbenes on human cancer cell lines.

The resveratrol analogue 6n, which has a bulky phenyl group attached to the amide and two methoxy group at ring B, proved the most potent against estrogen-sensitive breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). The analogue has an IC50 of 21.24 μM which is four times lower than that of resveratrol (IC50 = 85.71 μM) and comparable with that of vinblastine (IC50 = 21.00 μM). Interestingly, all the analogues that possess cytotoxic activity towards MCF-7 lost their inhibition when tested on estrogen-insensitive breast cancer (MDA-MB-231). The differences between these cancer cell lines are that MCF-7 possesses the estrogen receptor whereas MDA-MB-231 does not. This selective cytotoxic activity is also observed with resveratrol where its IC50 is 85.71 μM in MCF-7, and 143.57 μM in MDA-MB-231. This observation is due to the similar structure of resveratrol to the synthetic estrogen (diethylstilbestrol) and can act as a weak competitor in binding to the estrogen receptors [21]. The selective cytotoxicity towards estrogen-sensitive breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) lead us to hypothesize that the analogues (6a, 6d, 6i, 6l, 6n, 6p and 6s) may have similar estrogen receptor binding properties in MCF-7. Therefore, these analogues may be potential leads for the development of therapeutic agents for hormone-dependent tumors. The structural activity relationship showed that analogues with a furan moiety at ring A and methoxy group at ring B have improved cytotoxicity toward the colon cancer cell line (HT-29) when compared with resveratrol. Almost all analogues with the furan moiety showed potent cytotoxicity, in particular analogue 6i (IC50 = 7.51 μM) showed ten-fold improved cytotoxicity compared with resveratrol (IC50 = 72.9 μM) and four-fold to cisplatin (IC50 = 30.61 μM). Significant cytotoxicity is also observed in the prostate cancer cell line (DU-145) with analogue 6d having an IC50 value of 16.68 μM, which represents a six-fold increase in potency compared with resveratrol (IC50 = 107.92 μM). This improvement can be attributed to the acetyl group attached to the amide and fluorine, which is an electron withdrawing group at the meta position of the ring B in compound 6d. Together with 6d (IC50 = 129.78 μM), compound 6s (IC50 = 66.30 μM) having a propyl group attached to the amide, showed selective cytotoxic activity towards the pancreatic cancer cell line, BxPC-3, while sparing (IC50 > 200 μM) a normal pancreatic cell line (hTERT-HPNE). All the standards (cisplatin, vinblastine and resveratrol) showed no discrimination in their cytotoxicity between normal and cancer pancreatic cells. In chemotherapy, anticancer drugs that are selective towards cancer cells could reduce severe side-effects toward normal cells in the patient. Therefore, the analogues may offer an improved chemotherapy outcome for cancer patients compared to existing anticancer drugs.

Experimental Section

General

All spectral data were obtained on the following instruments: Infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer FTIR Spectrum RX-1 spectrometer at wavenumber from 4000–400 cm−1. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were obtained on a JEOL JNM-LA 400 and JEOL ECA-400. Spectra are reported in units of ppm on the δ scale, relative to chloroform and the coupling constants are given in Hz. Ultra Violet (UV) spectra were recorded from wavelength 190–400 nm, in methanol, on a Shimadzu UV-Visible Spectrophotometer 1650. Mass spectra were measured using Agilent 6530 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS system. Melting points were determined with Mel-Temp II melting point apparatus.

Material

Human cancer cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), 100 mM non-essential amino acids, phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.2), 50 μg/mL gentamicin and 2.5 μg/mL amphotericin B were purchased from Invitrogen Corporation (Carlsbad, CA, USA). 200 mM l-glutamine, foetal bovine serum, 0.25% trypsin-EDTA, dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), cisplatin, resveratrol and vinblastine sulphate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). MTS [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulphophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt] assay kit (CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution) was obtained from Promega (Madison, WI, USA).

Chemical

Unless otherwise noted, materials were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without purification. THF was freshly distilled over calcium hydride. DMF was dried over molecular sieves 4Å (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) prior to use. Column chromatography was performed using Merck silica gel (0.040–0.063 mm). For thin layer chromatography, Merck TLC aluminum sheets (silica gel 60 F254) were used; centrifugal chromatography, Merck silica gel 60 PF254 containing gypsum were used.

Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds

General Procedure for Styrene

To a suspension of methyltriphenylphosphonium iodide (1 equiv) in dry THF (25 mL), potassium tert-butoxide (1 equiv) was added in one portion. The mixture was stirred for 1 h at −70 °C to −80 °C. The appropriate aldehyde (1 equiv) was added to the solution. The ice bath was removed and the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. After consumption of starting material to form the product, the reaction was quenched with saturated ammonium chloride solution. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate and washed with plenty of distilled water. The resulting organic fractions were combined and solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield crude product. Purification by column chromatography afforded the desired product. The procedure for compounds 3f, 3g, 3h and 3k is attached in Appendix. 1,3-methoxy-5-vinylbenzene, 3f. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 6.66 (dd, J = 17.5, 10.7 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 2H), 6.41 (t, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.75 (dd, J = 17.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 5.26 (dd, J = 10.9, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 6H, 2 × OCH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 160.8, 139.5, 136.8, 114.2, 104.2, 99.9, 55.1 (2 × OCH3). 1-methoxy-2-vinylbenzene, 3g. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.46 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (dd, J = 17.8, 11.4 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.73 (dd, J = 17.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 5.25 (dd, J = 9.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 156.9, 131.9, 129.0, 126.9, 126.7, 120.8, 114.6, 111.0, 55.6. 1-methoxy-3-vinylbenzene, 3h. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.26 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 6.83 (dd, J = 8.2 Hz, 2.8Hz, 1H), 6.71 (dd, J = 17.8 Hz, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.77 (d, J = 17.8 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, OCH3, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 159.9, 139.1, 136.9, 129.6, 119.1, 114.2, 113.5, 111.6, 55.3 (OCH3). 4-vinyl-1,1′-biphenyl, 3k. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.60 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (dd, J = 17.8, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.80 (d, J = 17.8 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 140.9, 140.7, 136.7, 136.5, 128.9, 127.5, 127.4, 127.1, 126.8, 114.0.

General Procedure for the Preparation of N-(2-iodophenyl)acylamide

As described in [18] a solution of an appropriate acyl chloride (1 equiv) in 5 mL of dry THF was added dropwise to a stirred, cooled (0–5 °C) solution of 2-iodoaniline (1 equiv) and Et3N (1 equiv) in 20 mL of dry THF. The ice bath was then removed and the mixture stirred vigorously overnight at room temperature. Solid Et3N·HCl was then filtered off and washed with THF (3 × 5 mL). The resulting organic fractions were combined and THF was removed under reduced pressure to yield crude amides. Recrystallization from hexanes/chloroform and drying in vacuum produced the desired product. The procedure for compounds 5a–5f is attached in Appendix. N-(2-iodophenyl)acetamide, 5a. Mp 103–105 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.17 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.32 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 168.1, 138.8, 138.2, 129.2, 126.0, 122.1, 90.0, 24.8 (CH3). N-(2-iodophenyl)furan-2-carboxamide, 5b. Mp 80–81 °C; IR (NaCl): 3364, 1683, 1582, 1526, 1430, 1304, 1162, 1010, 750 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 257, 231; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.52 (br s, 1H, NH,), 8.39 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (td, J = 8.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (td, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (dd, J = 3.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 156.1, 147.7, 144.8, 139.0, 138.0, 129.4, 126.1, 121.7, 115.8, 112.8, 89.9; HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 313.9671, C11H9INO2 requires 313.9672. N-(2-iodophenyl)benzamide, 5c. Mp 135–137 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.46 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.30 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.96–7.98 (m, 2H), 7.82 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.51–7.61 (m, 3H), 7.41 (td, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (td, J = 7.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 165.4, 138.9, 138.4, 134.6, 132.3, 129.5, 129.0, 127.3, 126.2, 121.9, 90.3. N-(2-iodophenyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide, 5d. Mp 134–146 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.24 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.32 (td, J = 7.4, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (td, J = 7.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (tt, J = 11.7, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 1.23–2.06 (m, 10H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 174.4, 138.8, 138.3, 129.3, 125.9, 122.1, 90.2, 46.7, 29.8 (CH2), 25.8 (CH2). N-(2-iodophenyl)isobutyramide, 5e. Mp 110–111 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H,), 7.75 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.32 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 2.59 (septet, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, 2 × CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 175.3, 138.8, 138.2, 129.4, 125.9, 122.0, 90.2, 37.1, 19.7 (CH3). N-(2-iodophenyl)butyramide, 5f. Mp 81–83 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.22 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (br s, 1H, NH,), 7.33 (td, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.79 (sextet, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 1.03 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 171.3, 138.8, 138.3, 129.4, 126.0, 122.1, 90.0, 40.0, 19.2, 13.7 (CH3).

General Procedure for Stilbene

In a dry two neck flask, the appropriate N-(2-iodophenyl)acylamide (1 equiv) was dissolved in dry DMF and stirred under nitrogen. The solution was heated up to 120 °C and refluxed for a few minutes. Palladium (II) acetate (0.01 equiv) was added, followed by triethylamine (3.5 equiv) into the mixture. Lastly, the appropriate styrene (1.2 equiv) was added into the reaction flask. The mixture was heated at 120 °C under nitrogen until consumption of N-(2-iodophenyl)acylamide (check via TLC). The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated ammonium chloride aqueous solution. It was then extracted with ethyl acetate and washed with plenty of distilled water. The resulting organic fractions were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield crude product. Purification by column chromatography afforded the desired products. The procedure for compounds 6a–6s is attached in Appendix. (E)-N-(2-(4-chlorostyryl)phenyl)acetamide, 6a[22]. Mp 201–202 °C; IR (neat): 3281, 1642, 1531, 1299, 951, 803, 748 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.42 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) 135.5, 127.8, 128.9, 133.7, 128.9, 127.8, 130.9, 124.1, 130.4, 134.6, 124.7, 128.5, 125.8, 126.7, 24.2, 168.6 (C=O); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 272.0873, C16H15ClNO requires 272.0842. (E)-N-(2-(3-chlorostyryl)phenyl)acetamide, 6b. IR (neat): 3281, 1655, 1530, 1298, 951, 773, 749 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.47 (br s, 1H), 7.35–7.24 (m, 4H), 6.92 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) 139.0, 126.9, 134.8, 125.0, 128.8, 130.1, 130.8, 125.1, 130.3, 134.8, 124.8, 128.1, 125.9, 126.5, 24.4 (CH3), 168.8 (C=O); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 272.0800, C16H15ClNO requires 272.0842. (E)-N-(2-(4-fluorostyryl)phenyl)acetamide, 6c. IR (neat): 3259, 1659, 1527, 1297, 963, 818 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.46 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.01–7.05 (m, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) 163.7, 128.1, 115.7, 161.2, 115.5, 128.1, 131.0, 123.2, 130.4, 134.4, 124.5, 128.2, 125.6, 126.6, 24.1 (CH3), 168.6 (C=O); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 256.1139, C16H15FNO requires 256.1138. (E)-N-(2-(3-fluorostyryl)phenyl)acetamide, 6d. IR (neat): 3281, 1642, 1531, 1299, 951, 803, 748 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.14 (br s, 1H), 6.94 (td, J = 1.4, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.05 (m, 3H), 6.81 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04–7.10 (m, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.10 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) 139.6, 112.9, 162.0, 113.1, 130.2, 122.8, 130.3, 125.3, 130.4, 134.6, 124.7, 128.5, 125.8, 126.7, 24.2 (CH3), 168.6; HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 256.1810, C16H15FNO requires 256.1138. (E)-N-(2-(4-bromostyryl)phenyl)acetamide, 6e. IR (neat): 3315, 1664, 1557, 1259, 1029, 798, 772 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.48 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.91 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.19 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) 136.1, 132.0, 128.2, 121.9, 128.2, 132.0, 130.9, 124.3, 130.5, 134.7, 124.9, 128.6, 126.0, 126.8, 24.3 (CH3), 168.9; HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 316.0334, C16H15BrNO requires 316.0377. (E)-N-(2-(3,5-dimethoxystyryl)phenyl)acetamide, 6f. IR (NaCl): 3262, 1654, 1153, 773 cm−1. UV (MeOH)max nm: 305, 215; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.77 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.15 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 2H), 6.41 (t, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (s, 6H, OCH3), 2.19 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 168.8, 161.1, 139.1, 134.7, 132.4, 130.3, 128.4, 126.9, 125.7, 124.4, 124.2, 105.0, 100.1, 55.4, 24.3; HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 298.1430, C18H20NO3 requires 298.1443. (E)-N-(2-(2-methoxystyryl)phenyl)furan-2-carboxamide, 6g[15]. Mp 128–129 °C; IR (NaCl): 3285, 1671, 1585, 1304, 1247, 751 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 262, 321; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.25 (br s, 1H, NH), 8.04 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 16.8 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.33 (m, 3H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (dd, J = 3.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (s, 3H OCH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 157.3, 156.4, 148.0, 144.5, 134.1, 130.7, 129.3, 128.3, 128.2, 127.3, 127.2, 126.2, 125.6, 123.7, 123.5, 120.9, 115.4, 112.7, 111.1, 55.5 (OCH3); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 320.1285, C20H18NO3 requires 320.1287. (E)-N-(2-(3-methoxystyryl)phenyl)furan-2-carboxamide, 6h[15]. Mp 96–97 °C; IR (NaCl): 3285, 1669, 1585, 1521, 1304, 1163, 755 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 210, 264, 300; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.17 (br s, 1H, NH), 8.02 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (s, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.56 (dd, J = 3.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 160.0, 156.4, 147.9, 144.5, 138.5, 134.2, 132.9, 130.1, 129.9, 128.6, 127.3, 125.6, 123.6, 119.4, 115.6, 113.7, 112.7, 112.3, 55.4 (OCH3); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 320.1282, C20H18NO3 requires 320.1287. (E)-N-(2-(4-methoxystyryl)phenyl)furan-2-carboxamide, 6i[15]. Mp 120–121 °C; IR (NaCl): 3276, 1669, 1584, 1509, 1251, 755 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 271, 323; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.17 (br s, 1H, NH), 8.04 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (td, J = 7.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.56 (dd, J = 3.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 159.8, 156.3, 148.0, 144.5, 134.0, 132.7, 130.4, 129.9, 128.2, 128.1, 127.1, 125.6, 123.5, 121.0, 115.5, 114.3, 112.7, 55.5 (OCH3); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 320.1302, C20H18NO3 requires 320.1287. (E)-N-(2-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)phenyl)furan-2-carboxamide, 6j[15]. Mp 142–144 °C; IR (NaCl): 3239, 1651, 1575, 1514, 1456, 1265, 1157, 1137, 1027, 751 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 210, 252, 326; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.19 (br s, 1H, NH), 8.00 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (dd, J = 1.8, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (s, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.2, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (dd, J = 3.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 156.4, 149.4, 149.2, 148.0, 144.5, 134.0, 132.7, 130.4, 130.2, 128.2, 127.1, 125.6, 123.7, 121.4, 120.1, 115.4, 112.7, 111.4, 109.3, 56.1 (OCH3), 56.0 (OCH3); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 320.1411, C21H20NO4 requires 320.1392. (E)-N-(2-(3,5-dimethoxystyryl)phenyl)furan-2-carboxamide, 6k[15]. Mp 109–110 °C; IR (NaCl): 3282, 1670, 1590, 1520, 1455, 1303, 1204, 1152, 1065, 755 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 239, 269, 308; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.16 (br s, 1H, NH), 8.04 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (td, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (s, 2H, H-2), 6.56 (dd, J = 3.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 6H, 2xOCH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 161.1, 156.3, 147.9, 144.5, 139.1, 134.2, 133.0, 129.9, 128.6, 127.3, 125.6, 123.9, 123.6, 115.6, 112.7, 105.0, 100.3, 55.9 (2 × OCH3); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 350.1412, C21H20NO4 requires 350.1392. (E)-N-(2-(2-(biphenyl-4-yl)vinyl)phenyl)furan-2-carboxamide, 6l[15]. Mp 142–143 °C; IR (NaCl): 3283, 1671, 1585, 1521, 1487, 1452, 1304, 762 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 204, 267, 323; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.19 (br s, 1H, NH), 8.04 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.58–7.64 (m, 7H), 7.52 (t, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.21–7.30 (m, 3H), 7.10 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 156.4, 148.0, 144.5, 141.0, 140.6, 136.1, 134.2, 132.5, 130.2, 129.0, 128.6, 127.6, 127.5, 127.3, 127.0, 125.7, 123.7, 123.3, 115.6, 112.7; HRMS (+ESI) [M + Na]+: 388.1324, C27H22NO requires 388.1308. An X-ray of this compound was published in 2008 [23]. (E)-N-(2-(2-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)vinyl)phenyl)benzamide, 6m[15]. Mp 167–169 °C; IR (NaCl): 3271, 1648, 1517, 1487, 1302, 764 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 319; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.05 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.91 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 7.43–7.62 (m, 12H), 7.31–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.22–7.26 (m, 2H), 7.06 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 166.0, 140.9, 140.6, 136.1, 134.8, 134.7, 132.2, 132.1, 131.0, 129.0, 128.5, 127.5, 127.3, 127.2, 127.1, 127.0, 126.0, 124.7, 123.5; HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 376.1691, C27H22NO requires 376.1701. (E)-N-(2-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)phenyl)benzamide, 6n[15]. Mp 169–171 °C; IR (NaCl): 3273, 3012, 1646, 1572, 1509, 1265, 749 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 231, 324; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 8.03 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.87 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 3H), 7.51–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (s, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 166.0, 149.4, 149.2, 134.8, 134.7, 132.5, 132.0, 131.1, 130.2, 128.9, 128.2, 127.3, 127.0, 125.9, 124.5, 121.7, 120.1, 111.3, 109.1, 56.0 (OCH3), 55.9 (OCH3); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 360.1594, C23H22NO3 requires 360.1600. (E)-N-(2-(4-methoxystyryl)phenyl)benzamide, 6o. IR (neat): 3283, 1644, 1512, 1482, 1248, 1178, 1027, 749 cm−1; 1H NMR (400MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.82 (s, 3H. OCH3), 6.87 (dt, J = 3.2, 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (t, J = 7.3 Hz 2H), 7.89 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.97 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 132.0, 129.0, 127.2, 134.8, 134.6, 124.1, 128.2, 125.8, 127.1, 130.9, 121.1, 132.9, 129.8, 128.1, 114.3, 159.8, 165.5; HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 330.1493, C22H20NO2 requires 330.1494. (E)-N-(2-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)phenyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide, 6p[15]. Mp 204–206 °C; IR (NaCl): 2930, 2853, 1682, 1515, 1449, 1269, 1137, 1026, 757 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 217, 300; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (td, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.17 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (s, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.90 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.31 (tt, J = 11.7, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 1.22–2.01 (m, 10H);13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 174.5, 149.3, 149.2, 134.6, 132.2, 130.8, 130.2, 128.1, 126.8, 125.6, 124.4, 121.7, 120.1, 111.3, 108.9, 56.1 (OCH3), 55.9 (OCH3), 46.3, 29.9, 25.8; HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 366.2069, C23H28NO3 requires 366.2069. (E)-N-(2-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)phenyl)isobutyramide, 6q[15]. Mp 166–168 °C; IR (NaCl): 3274, 1652, 1516, 1269, 1141, 1025, 961, 801, 752 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 210, 236, 325; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.74 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.24 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (s, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 6H, 2xOCH3), 2.54–2.61 (m, 1H), 1.27 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 175.6, 149.3, 149.2, 134.6, 132.1, 130.9, 130.2, 128.1, 126.8, 125.7, 124.5, 121.7, 120.1, 111.3, 108.9, 56.1 (OCH3), 55.9 (OCH3), 36.5, 19.9 (2 × CH3); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 326.1759, C20H24NO3 requires 326.1756. (E)-N-(2-(4-methoxystyryl)phenyl)isobutyramide, 6r. IR (NaCl): 3267, 2966, 1510, 1267, 1033, 750 cm−1; 1H NMR (400MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.27 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H), 2.53–2.59 (m, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.79 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (td, J = 1.0, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (m, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (m, 2H), 7.33 (br s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 19.8 (CH3), 36.5, 55.4 (OCH3), 134.6, 124.2, 128.0, 125.5, 126.9, 130.7, 121.3, 132.0, 129.9, 128.0, 114.3, 175.5; HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 296.1649, C19H22NO2 requires 296.1651. (E)-N-(2-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)phenyl)butyramide, 6s[15]. Mp 139–140 °C; IR (NaCl): 3280, 2963, 1510, 1267, 1025, 759 cm−1; UV (MeOH)max nm: 206, 323; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 7.63 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.46 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (s, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.31 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.69–1.75 (m, 2H, CH2), 0.97 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): 172.0, 149.2, 149.1, 134.6, 131.6, 131.1, 130.3, 127.9, 126.5, 125.7, 124.9, 121.8, 120.1, 111.3, 109.1, 56.0 (OCH3), 55.9 (OCH3), 39.3, 19.4, 13.9 (CH3); HRMS (+ESI) [M + H]+: 326.1755, C20H24NO3 requires 326.1756.

Cytotoxic Assays

Cytotoxicity of the compounds were evaluated against a panel of 5 cancer cell lines; prostate (DU-145), pancreatic (BxPC-3), colon (HT-29), breast (MCF-7) and (MDA-MB-231); and one normal cell line, pancreatic (hTERT-HPNE). The cancer cell lines were chosen from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) list of 60 cancer cell lines for drug screening and drug treatment conditions adhered to NCI recommendations [24]. Cell lines were cultured in DMEM media supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 10% foetal bovine serum, 50 μg/mL gentamicin and 2.5 μg/mL amphotericin B, maintained in a 37 °C humid atmosphere of 5% CO2 cell incubator. hTERT-HPNE cell line was cultured in the same DMEM with 10 ng/mL human recombinant epithelial growth factor as recommended by ATCC. Samples and drug standards (cisplatin, resveratrol and vinblastine) were dissolved in DMSO and immediately diluted with DMEM media to yield a final DMSO concentration of less than 0.5% v/v. Cells were plated into 96-well microplates at 5000–10,000 cells per well and maintained in the cell incubator for 24 h. Then, 100 μL of samples were introduced in triplicates to a final concentration of 0.1–200 μM. Drug standards were also introduced to a final concentration of 0.03–2000 μM (cisplatin) 0.78–400 μM (resveratrol) and 0.002–200 μM (vinblastine). Cells were further incubated for 48 h and then, cell viability was determined according to the manufacturer protocol of a commercial MTS assay kit (CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution, Promega). Culture media were carefully refreshed with 100 μL of DMEM media, followed by 20 μL per well of MTS reagent. Microplates were returned to the incubator for 1–2 h and absorbance of the formazan product was read on a microplate reader at 490 nm with 690 nm as the background wavelength (Infinite 200, Tecan, Mannedorf, Swizerland). IC50 of samples and drug standards were determined using dose-response curves, and statistical analysis using student’s T-test (p < 0.05) was performed in Prism 5.02 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

Conclusions

A total of 19 analogues of o-carboxamido stilbenes were synthesized using the Heck method. These analogues possessing the amide moiety with different substituent groups displayed varying cytotoxic activity toward various human cancer cell lines with the most potent compounds; compound 6d (IC50 = 16.68 μM, prostate cancer DU-145), compound 6i (IC50 = 7.51 μM, colon cancer HT-29), compound 6n (IC50 = 21.24 μM, estrogen-sensitive breast cancer MCF-7) and compound 6s (IC50 = 66.30 μM, pancreatic cancer BxPC-3). Interestingly, all these potent compounds did not show any cytotoxicity toward the normal pancreatic cell line (hTERT-HPNE) compared to vinblastine, cisplastin and resveratrol which exhibited cytotoxicity toward the normal pancreatic cell line (hTERT-HPNE). These results provide progress in our knowledge to support future designs of stilbene-based anticancer drugs.
  19 in total

1.  Resveratrol ameliorates aging-related metabolic phenotypes by inhibiting cAMP phosphodiesterases.

Authors:  Sung-Jun Park; Faiyaz Ahmad; Andrew Philp; Keith Baar; Tishan Williams; Haibin Luo; Hengming Ke; Holger Rehmann; Ronald Taussig; Alexandra L Brown; Myung K Kim; Michael A Beaven; Alex B Burgin; Vincent Manganiello; Jay H Chung
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Further naphthylcombretastatins. An investigation on the role of the naphthalene moiety.

Authors:  Ana B S Maya; Concepción Pérez-Melero; Carmen Mateo; Dulce Alonso; José Luis Fernández; Consuelo Gajate; Faustino Mollinedo; Rafael Peláez; Esther Caballero; Manuel Medarde
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of (E) stilbene derivatives.

Authors:  Sabrina Albert; Ralf Horbach; Holger B Deising; Bianka Siewert; René Csuk
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 4.  A reappraisal of the potential chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic properties of resveratrol.

Authors:  J Gusman; H Malonne; G Atassi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 5.  Cardiovascular effects and molecular targets of resveratrol.

Authors:  Huige Li; Ning Xia; Ulrich Förstermann
Journal:  Nitric Oxide       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.427

6.  Anti-proliferative effect of resveratrol, a natural component of grapes and wine, on human colonic cancer cells.

Authors:  Y Schneider; F Vincent; B Duranton; L Badolo; F Gossé; C Bergmann; N Seiler; F Raul
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Selective Pd-catalyzed oxidative coupling of anilides with olefins through C-H bond activation at room temperature.

Authors:  Maarten D K Boele; Gino P F van Strijdonck; André H M de Vries; Paul C J Kamer; Johannes G de Vries; Piet W N M van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 8.  Resveratrol and its analogs: defense against cancer, coronary disease and neurodegenerative maladies or just a fad?

Authors:  Philipp Saiko; Akos Szakmary; Walter Jaeger; Thomas Szekeres
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Synthetic resveratrol aliphatic acid inhibits TLR2-mediated apoptosis and an involvement of Akt/GSK3beta pathway.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Yi Zhang; Xiuli Sun; Hui Li; Gene LeSage; Avani Javer; Xiumei Zhang; Xinbing Wei; Yulin Jiang; Deling Yin
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  (E)-N-[2-(Biphenyl-4-ylvin-yl)phen-yl]furan-2-carboxamide.

Authors:  Chin Hui Kee; Noel F Thomas; Azhar Ariffin; Khalijah Awang; Seik Weng Ng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-10-25
View more
  1 in total

1.  Synthesis of Bio-Inspired 1,3-Diarylpropene Derivatives via Heck Cross-Coupling and Cytotoxic Evaluation on Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Aik Sian Tan; Jaymeer Singh; Nurul Syafiqah Rezali; Musthahimah Muhamad; Nik Nur Syazni Nik Mohamed Kamal; Yvan Six; Mohamad Nurul Azmi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.927

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.