Literature DB >> 24287319

Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.

James E Thompson1, Sam Egger2, Maret Böhm3, Anne-Maree Haynes3, Jayne Matthews4, Krishan Rasiah4, Phillip D Stricker5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparative studies suggest functional and perioperative superiority of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) over open radical prostatectomy (ORP).
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high-volume experienced open surgeons can improve their functional and oncologic outcomes with RARP and, if so, how many cases are required to surpass ORP outcomes and reach the learning curve plateau. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective observational study compared two surgical techniques: 1552 consecutive men underwent RARP (866) or ORP (686) at a single Australian hospital from 2006 to 2012, by one surgeon with 3000 prior ORPs. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Demographic and clinicopathologic data were collected prospectively. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite quality of life (QoL) questionnaire was administered at baseline, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo. Multivariate linear and logistic regression modelled the difference in QoL domains and positive surgical margin (PSM) odds ratio (OR), respectively, against case number. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 1511 men were included in the PSM and 609 in the QoL analysis. RARP sexual function scores surpassed ORP scores after 99 RARPs and increased to a mean difference at 861st case of 11.0 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-16.1), plateauing around 600-700 RARPs. Early urinary incontinence scores for RARP surpassed ORP after 182 RARPs and increased to a mean difference of 8.4 points (95% CI, 2.1-14.7), plateauing around 700-800 RARPs. The odds of a pT2 PSM were initially higher for RARP but became lower after 108 RARPs and were 55% lower (OR: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.92) by the 866th RARP. The odds of a pT3/4 PSM were initially higher for RARP but decreased, plateauing around 200-300 RARPs with an OR of 1.15 (0.68-1.95) at the 866th RARP. Limitations include single-surgeon data and residual confounding.
CONCLUSIONS: RARP had a long learning curve with inferior outcomes initially, and then showed progressively superior sexual, early urinary, and pT2 PSM outcomes and similar pT3 PSM and late urinary outcomes. Learning RARP was worthwhile for this high-volume surgeon, but the learning curve may not be justifiable for late-career/low-volume surgeons; further studies are needed.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative study; Learning curve; Oncologic outcomes; Positive surgical margin; Prospective; Quality of life; Radical prostatectomy; Retropubic; Robotic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24287319     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  39 in total

1.  Quality of life after radical prostatectomy: Continuing to improve on our track record.

Authors:  Garson Chan; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Adding a newly trained surgeon into a high-volume robotic prostatectomy group: are outcomes compromised?

Authors:  Luchen Wang; Mireya Diaz; Hans Stricker; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

Review 3.  Surgical Management of Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer with Review of Literature and Evolving Evidence.

Authors:  Ahmed Saeed Goolam; Alfredo Harb-De la Rosa; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-13

4.  The impact of days off between cases on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shane M Pearce; Joseph J Pariser; Sanjay G Patel; Blake B Anderson; Scott E Eggener; Gregory P Zagaja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Prostate cancer: Nerve-sparing surgery and risk of positive surgical margins.

Authors:  Katharina Boehm; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  The safety of urologic robotic surgery depends on the skills of the surgeon.

Authors:  Erika Palagonia; Elio Mazzone; Geert De Naeyer; Frederiek D'Hondt; Justin Collins; Pawel Wisz; Fijs W B Van Leeuwen; Henk Van Der Poel; Peter Schatteman; Alexandre Mottrie; Paolo Dell'Oglio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.

Authors:  Sandeep Krishan Nayar; Liam Musto; Roland Fernandes; Rasiah Bharathan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  How to minimize lymphoceles and treat clinically symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hak J Lee; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Prostate cancer: Superior outcomes after a long learning curve with RARP.

Authors:  Vipul Patel; Srinivas Samavedi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.