OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of ultrasound elastography (UE) in the assessment of healthy patellar tendon and to describe its UE pattern. METHODS: Twenty-two patellar tendons of 11 out of 16 healthy subjects who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated three times by ultrasound (US) and UE at their proximal, middle and distal portions, by two separate sonographers with different experiences in UE. RESULTS: In all tendon portions the color map analysis showed a predominance of green (highly elastic), with good values of intra-observer (Operator 1: P-values = 0.790, 0.864, 0.865; Operator 2: P = 0.642, 0.882, 0.613 for proximal, middle and distal portions, respectively) and inter-observer (P = 0.657) agreement. For both operators the intra-observer analysis of the elasticity ratio (ER) between the tendon and the subcutis showed high agreement values (P < 0.001 for both operators). The inter-observer analysis showed also high agreement values (P < 0.001 at proximal, P = 0.001 at middle, P = 0.005 at distal portions). The overall analysis of the ER of the tendon portions showed values of (mean ± SD): 1.47 ± 0.64, 4.38 ± 1.36, 3.32 ± 1.20 for proximal, middle and distal portions, respectively. The mean time to perform the UE evaluation for the inexperienced operator was 5 min at the beginning of the study but decreased to 2 min after a few examinations were done. The mean time for the expert was 2 min for the entire study. CONCLUSIONS: UE is a feasible and reproducible tool for the evaluation of the healthy patellar tendon and further data are needed to define its role in the assessment of tendon pathology.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of ultrasound elastography (UE) in the assessment of healthy patellar tendon and to describe its UE pattern. METHODS: Twenty-two patellar tendons of 11 out of 16 healthy subjects who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated three times by ultrasound (US) and UE at their proximal, middle and distal portions, by two separate sonographers with different experiences in UE. RESULTS: In all tendon portions the color map analysis showed a predominance of green (highly elastic), with good values of intra-observer (Operator 1: P-values = 0.790, 0.864, 0.865; Operator 2: P = 0.642, 0.882, 0.613 for proximal, middle and distal portions, respectively) and inter-observer (P = 0.657) agreement. For both operators the intra-observer analysis of the elasticity ratio (ER) between the tendon and the subcutis showed high agreement values (P < 0.001 for both operators). The inter-observer analysis showed also high agreement values (P < 0.001 at proximal, P = 0.001 at middle, P = 0.005 at distal portions). The overall analysis of the ER of the tendon portions showed values of (mean ± SD): 1.47 ± 0.64, 4.38 ± 1.36, 3.32 ± 1.20 for proximal, middle and distal portions, respectively. The mean time to perform the UE evaluation for the inexperienced operator was 5 min at the beginning of the study but decreased to 2 min after a few examinations were done. The mean time for the expert was 2 min for the entire study. CONCLUSIONS: UE is a feasible and reproducible tool for the evaluation of the healthy patellar tendon and further data are needed to define its role in the assessment of tendon pathology.
Authors: Alberto de Castro Pochini; Mario Ferretti; Eduardo Felipe Kin Ito Kawakami; Artur da Rocha Corrêa Fernandes; Andre Fukunishi Yamada; Gabriela Clemente de Oliveira; Moisés Cohen; Carlos Vicente Andreoli; Benno Ejnisman Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Date: 2015 Oct-Dec