Literature DB >> 24285594

Initial experience with the Glidesheath Slender for transradial coronary angiography and intervention: a feasibility study with prospective radial ultrasound follow-up.

Adel Aminian1, Dariouch Dolatabadi, Pascal Lefebvre, Robert Zimmerman, Philippe Brunner, Georges Michalakis, Jacques Lalmand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Glidesheath Slender in routine transradial (TR) coronary angiography and intervention.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, The TR approach has gained in popularity because of several advantages such as reduced vascular access site complications and immediate patient mobilization. Procedural success has been further improved through technological innovations and the development of less invasive devices. The Glidesheath Slender (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) is a new dedicated radial sheath with a thinner wall and hydrophilic coating. It combines an inner diameter compatible with 6Fr guiding catheter with an outer diameter close to current 5Fr sheaths. Its use has the potential to decrease invasiveness and access site complications during TR procedures.
METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive patients undergoing TR coronary angiography and/or PCI using the Gidesheath Slender were included in a prospective single-center feasibility and safety study.
RESULTS: Procedural success was 99.1% with only one case requiring conversion to femoral access. There were six minor hematomas but none of the patients experienced major vascular complications. The rate of symptomatic radial spasm was 4.4%. No case of major sheath kinking was noted. Doppler ultrasound examination of the radial artery at 1 month follow-up was available in 113/114 patients with only one case of radial artery occlusion (RAO) (0.88%).
CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of the Glidesheath Slender for TR coronary angiography and interventions is safe and feasible with a high rate of procedural success and a low rate of RAO.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  radial occlusion; radial sheath; transradial access; transradial approach

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24285594     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  12 in total

1.  Hepatic radioembolization from transradial access: initial experience and comparison to transfemoral access.

Authors:  Bela Kis; Matthew Mills; Sarah E Hoffe
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Strategies to prevent radial artery occlusion after transradial PCI.

Authors:  Samir B Pancholy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Expert Opinion: Transradial Coronary Artery Procedures: Tips for Success.

Authors:  Kully Sandhu; Robert Butler; James Nolan
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-05

Review 4.  Radial Artery and Ulnar Artery Occlusions Following Coronary Procedures and the Impact of Anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (Radial and Ulnar ARTEry Occlusion Meta-AnalysIS) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  George Hahalis; Konstantinos Aznaouridis; Gregory Tsigkas; Periklis Davlouros; Ioanna Xanthopoulou; Nikolaos Koutsogiannis; Ioanna Koniari; Marianna Leopoulou; Olivier Costerousse; Dimitris Tousoulis; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Safe and rapid radial hemostasis achieved using a novel topical hemostatic patch: Results of a first-in-human pilot study using hydrophobically modified polysaccharide-chitosan.

Authors:  Rajeev Anchan; Joseph Venturini; Paul Larsen; Linda Lee; Christopher Fernandez; Stephanie A Besser; Rohan Kalathiya; Jonathan Paul; John Blair; Sandeep Nathan
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.585

6.  Safety and feasibility of the new 5 Fr Glidesheath Slender.

Authors:  Fuminobu Yoshimachi; Ferdinand Kiemeneij; Motomaru Masutani; Takashi Matsukage; Akihiko Takahashi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2015-07-04

Review 7.  Transradial approach for coronary procedures in the elderly population.

Authors:  Shamsi Aamir; Shah Mohammed; Rathore Sudhir
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 8.  Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Rashid; Chun Shing Kwok; Samir Pancholy; Sanjay Chugh; Sasko A Kedev; Ivo Bernat; Karim Ratib; Adrian Large; Doug Fraser; James Nolan; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Percutaneous transradial artery approach for femoro- popliteal artery intervention in the current era in Japan.

Authors:  Akihiro Nakamura; Masanori Kanazawa; Kazuki Noda; Hideaki Endo; Tohru Takahashi; Eiji Nozaki
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-11-29

10.  Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients: A substudy from RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Adel Aminian; Shigeru Saito; Akihiko Takahashi; Ivo Bernat; Robert Lee Jobe; Takashi Kajiya; Ian C Gilchrist; Yves Louvard; Ferdinand Kiemeneij; Niels van Royen; Maarten van Leeuwen; Seiji Yamazaki; Takashi Matsukage; Juan F Iglesias; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.