Literature DB >> 33576564

Safe and rapid radial hemostasis achieved using a novel topical hemostatic patch: Results of a first-in-human pilot study using hydrophobically modified polysaccharide-chitosan.

Rajeev Anchan1, Joseph Venturini1, Paul Larsen1, Linda Lee1, Christopher Fernandez1, Stephanie A Besser1, Rohan Kalathiya1, Jonathan Paul1, John Blair1, Sandeep Nathan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) for catheter interventions decreases vascular complications and bleeding versus transfemoral approach. Reducing time to hemostasis and preventing radial artery occlusion (RAO) following TRA are important and incompletely realized aspirations.
OBJECTIVES: This first-in-human study sought to evaluate the efficacy of a novel, topically applied compound (hydrophobically modified polysaccharide-chitosan, hm-P) plus minimal required pneumatic compression, to achieve rapid radial arterial hemostasis in post-TRA procedures compared with de facto standards.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: About 50 adult patients undergoing 6 French diagnostic TRA procedures were prospectively enrolled. At procedure completion, a topical hm-P impregnated patch was placed over the dermotomy and TR Band (TRB) compression was applied to the access site. This patch was used as part of a novel rapid deflation protocol with a primary outcome of time to hemostasis. Photographic and vascular ultrasound evaluation of the radial artery was performed to evaluate the procedural site.
RESULTS: Time to hemostasis was 40.5 min (IQR: 38-50 min) with the majority of patients (n = 39, 78%) not requiring reinflation. Patients with bleeding requiring TRB reinflation were more likely to have low body weight and liver dysfunction, with absence of hypertension and LV dysfunction. The rate of RAO was 0% with predischarge radial artery patency documented in all patients using vascular ultrasound. One superficial hematoma was noted. No late bleeding events or cutaneous reactions were reported in the study follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Topical application of hm-P in conjunction with pneumatic compression was safe and resulted in rapid and predictable hemostasis at the arterial puncture site.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chitosan; hemostasis; transradial; vascular access

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33576564      PMCID: PMC9034370          DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.585


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.

Authors:  Sylvain Plante; Warren J Cantor; Lorne Goldman; Steven Miner; Amy Quesnelle; Anusoumya Ganapathy; Abdol Popel; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  A self-assembling hydrophobically modified chitosan capable of reversible hemostatic action.

Authors:  Matthew B Dowling; Rakesh Kumar; Mark A Keibler; John R Hess; Grant V Bochicchio; Srinivasa R Raghavan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Effect of duration of hemostatic compression on radial artery occlusion after transradial access.

Authors:  Samir B Pancholy; Tejas M Patel
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Radial hemostasis: Harder, better, faster, stronger?

Authors:  Arnold H Seto; Morton J Kern
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Successive transradial access for coronary procedures: experience of Quebec Heart-Lung Institute.

Authors:  Eltigani Abdelaal; Pierre Molin; Guillaume Plourde; Jimmy Machaalany; Yoann Bataille; Cynthia Brousseau-Provencher; Sarah Montminy; Eric Larose; Louis Roy; Onil Gleeton; Gérald Barbeau; Can M Nguyen; Bernard Noël; Olivier Costerousse; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Comparison of Hemostasis Times with a Chitosan-Based Hemostatic Pad (Clo-SurPlus Radial™) vs Mechanical Compression (TR Band®) Following Transradial Access: A pilot Study.

Authors:  Jonathan S Roberts; Jianli Niu; Juan A Pastor-Cervantes
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2018-12-06

7.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; Salim Yusuf; John Cairns; Kari Niemelä; Denis Xavier; Petr Widimsky; Andrzej Budaj; Matti Niemelä; Vicent Valentin; Basil S Lewis; Alvaro Avezum; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Sunil V Rao; Peggy Gao; Rizwan Afzal; Campbell D Joyner; Susan Chrolavicius; Shamir R Mehta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization.

Authors:  Samir Pancholy; John Coppola; Tejas Patel; Marie Roke-Thomas
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Randomized Trial of Compression Duration After Transradial Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention.

Authors:  Shahar Lavi; Asim Cheema; Andrew Yadegari; Zeev Israeli; Yaniv Levi; Sabrina Wall; Mistre Alemayehu; Yasir Parviz; Bogdan-Dorian Murariu; Terry McPherson; Jaffer Syed; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Compare Complication of Classic versus Patent Hemostasis in Transradial Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Farshad Roghani; Mohammad Nasim Tajik; Alireza Khosravi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2017-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.