Jee Hyun Suh1, Soo Jeong Han1, Seo Young Jeon1, Ho Jeong Kim1, Jeong Eun Lee2, Tae Sik Yoon1, Hyun Ju Chong3. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seonam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Music Therapy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) improves gait velocity, cadence, and stride length in hemiplegic stroke patients, yet little is known about the effectiveness of RAS on standing balance. OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare the effectiveness on standing balance and gait parameter of two different types of gait trainings, gait training with RAS versus gait training without RAS, was compared in two groups of hemiplegic stroke patients over a three-week period (RAS group, n = 8; control group = 8). METHODS:Sixteen hemiplegic stroke patients were included in the study. Standing balance was measured by using Biosway®. Stride length, gait velocity, and cadence were calculated from the number of steps and required time for a 10 m-walk. RESULTS: Pre- to post-test measures showed a significant improvement in RAS group for overall stability index (p = 0.043), mediolateral index (p = 0.006), anteroposterior index (p = 0.016), gait velocity (p = 0.012), stride length (p = 0.03) and cadence (p = 0.012) over the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that RAS was an effective therapeutic method to improve gait velocity, stride length, cadence, and standing balance in hemiplegic stroke patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) improves gait velocity, cadence, and stride length in hemiplegic strokepatients, yet little is known about the effectiveness of RAS on standing balance. OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare the effectiveness on standing balance and gait parameter of two different types of gait trainings, gait training with RAS versus gait training without RAS, was compared in two groups of hemiplegic strokepatients over a three-week period (RAS group, n = 8; control group = 8). METHODS: Sixteen hemiplegic strokepatients were included in the study. Standing balance was measured by using Biosway®. Stride length, gait velocity, and cadence were calculated from the number of steps and required time for a 10 m-walk. RESULTS: Pre- to post-test measures showed a significant improvement in RAS group for overall stability index (p = 0.043), mediolateral index (p = 0.006), anteroposterior index (p = 0.016), gait velocity (p = 0.012), stride length (p = 0.03) and cadence (p = 0.012) over the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that RAS was an effective therapeutic method to improve gait velocity, stride length, cadence, and standing balance in hemiplegic strokepatients.