Literature DB >> 24283628

The effects of divided attention on encoding processes under incidental and intentional learning instructions: underlying mechanisms?

Moshe Naveh-Benjamin1, Jonathan Guez, Yoko Hara, Matthew S Brubaker, Iris Lowenschuss-Erlich.   

Abstract

Divided attention (DA) at encoding has been shown to significantly disrupt later memory for the studied information. However, what type of processing gets disrupted during DA remains unresolved. In this study, we assessed the degree to which strategic effortful processes are affected under DA by comparing the effects of DA at encoding under intentional and pure incidental learning instructions. In three experiments, participants studied list of words or word pairs under either full or divided attention. Results of three experiments, which used different methodologies, converged to show that the effects of DA at encoding reduce memory performance to the same degree under incidental and intentional learning. Secondary task performance indicated that encoding under intentional learning instructions was more effortful than under incidental learning instructions. In addition, the results indicated enhanced attention to the initial appearance of the words under both types of learning instructions. Results are interpreted to imply that other processes, rather than only strategic effortful ones, might be affected by DA at encoding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Divided attention; Effortful strategies; Incidental–intentional learning; Memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24283628     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.867517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  5 in total

1.  No Evidence Against Sketch Reinstatement of Context, Verbal Labels or the Use of Registered Intermediaries for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Response to Henry et al. (2017).

Authors:  Coral J Dando; Thomas C Ormerod; Penny Cooper; Ruth Marchant; Michelle Mattison; Rebecca Milne; Ray Bull
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-07

2.  Comorbidities confounding the outcomes of surgery for third window syndrome: Outlier analysis.

Authors:  P Ashley Wackym; Heather T Mackay-Promitas; Shaban Demirel; Gerard J Gianoli; Martin S Gizzi; Dale M Carter; David A Siker
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-22

3.  The impact of individual differences on jurors' note taking during trials and recall of trial evidence, and the association between the type of evidence recalled and verdicts.

Authors:  Joanna Lorek; Luna C M Centifanti; Minna Lyons; Craig Thorley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Parameters of Memory Reconsolidation: Learning Mode Influences Likelihood of Memory Modification.

Authors:  Katharine C Simon; Lynn Nadel; Rebecca L Gómez
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  The effects of divided attention at encoding on specific and gist-based associative episodic memory.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Greene; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-06-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.