BACKGROUND: Despite the high frequency of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis, its assessment has not gained entrance into clinical routine yet, due to lack of time-saving and suitable tests for patients with multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the paradigm of visual search with neuropsychological standard tests, in order to identify the test that discriminates best between patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals concerning cognitive functions, without being susceptible to practice effects. METHODS: Patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (n = 38) and age-and gender-matched healthy individuals (n = 40) were tested with common neuropsychological tests and a computer-based visual search task, whereby a target stimulus has to be detected amongst distracting stimuli on a touch screen. Twenty-eight of the healthy individuals were re-tested in order to determine potential practice effects. RESULTS: Mean reaction time reflecting visual attention and movement time indicating motor execution in the visual search task discriminated best between healthy individuals and patients with multiple sclerosis, without practice effects. CONCLUSIONS: Visual search is a promising instrument for the assessment of cognitive functions and potentially cognitive changes in patients with multiple sclerosis thanks to its good discriminatory power and insusceptibility to practice effects.
BACKGROUND: Despite the high frequency of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis, its assessment has not gained entrance into clinical routine yet, due to lack of time-saving and suitable tests for patients with multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the paradigm of visual search with neuropsychological standard tests, in order to identify the test that discriminates best between patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals concerning cognitive functions, without being susceptible to practice effects. METHODS:Patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (n = 38) and age-and gender-matched healthy individuals (n = 40) were tested with common neuropsychological tests and a computer-based visual search task, whereby a target stimulus has to be detected amongst distracting stimuli on a touch screen. Twenty-eight of the healthy individuals were re-tested in order to determine potential practice effects. RESULTS: Mean reaction time reflecting visual attention and movement time indicating motor execution in the visual search task discriminated best between healthy individuals and patients with multiple sclerosis, without practice effects. CONCLUSIONS:Visual search is a promising instrument for the assessment of cognitive functions and potentially cognitive changes in patients with multiple sclerosis thanks to its good discriminatory power and insusceptibility to practice effects.
Authors: J B Boringa; R H Lazeron; I E Reuling; H J Adèr; L Pfennings; J Lindeboom; L M de Sonneville; N F Kalkers; C H Polman Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: J M Sonder; L V A E Bosma; F A H van der Linden; D L Knol; C H Polman; B M J Uitdehaag Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Ralph H B Benedict; Jill S Fischer; Cate J Archibald; Peter A Arnett; William W Beatty; Julie Bobholz; Gordon J Chelune; John D Fisk; Dawn W Langdon; Lauren Caruso; Fred Foley; Nicholas G LaRocca; Lindsey Vowels; Amy Weinstein; John DeLuca; Stephen M Rao; Frederick Munschauer Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Maria Pia Amato; Dawn Langdon; Xavier Montalban; Ralph H B Benedict; John DeLuca; Lauren B Krupp; Alan J Thompson; Giancarlo Comi Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-11-23 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Kathrin S Utz; De-Hyung Lee; Alexandra Lämmer; Anne Waschbisch; Ralf A Linker; Thomas Schenk Journal: Ther Adv Neurol Disord Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 6.570
Authors: Curtis M Wojcik; Meghan Beier; Kathleen Costello; John DeLuca; Anthony Feinstein; Yael Goverover; Mark Gudesblatt; Michael Jaworski; Rosalind Kalb; Lori Kostich; Nicholas G LaRocca; Jonathan D Rodgers; Ralph Hb Benedict Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Johannes Gehrig; Heinrich Johannes Bergmann; Laura Fadai; Dilara Soydaş; Christian Buschenlange; Marcus J Naumer; Jochen Kaiser; Stefan Frisch; Marion Behrens; Christian Foerch; Yavor Yalachkov Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 4.003