Carolyn L Kerrigan1, Sheri S Slezak. 1. Lebanon, N.H.; and Baltimore, Md. From the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Section of Plastic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; the Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center.
Abstract
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Accurately state the indications for breast imaging prior to breast reduction; 2. List the modifiable risk factors in a woman considering breast reduction. 3. Use perioperative antibiotics in an evidence based fashion. 4. Identify factors that are associated with higher rates of perioperative complications. 5. Describe the risks and benefits of breast infiltration with epinephrine. 6. Describe the pros and cons of using drains following breast reduction. 7. Describe the incidence of invasive breast cancer in surgical specimens compared to autopsy specimens. 8. Identify common questionnaires that can be used to track short and long-term outcomes following breast reduction. 9. List at least three current practices that are now evolving and changing based on evidence based medicine. SUMMARY: This paper is designed to summarize key evidence based steps in the care of women undergoing reduction mammaplasty. In addition, the authors identify gaps between how plastic surgeons practice breast reduction and what the best evidence supports. The article was prepared to accompany practice-based assessment with ongoing surgical education for the Maintenance of Certification Program of the American Board of Plastic Surgery.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Accurately state the indications for breast imaging prior to breast reduction; 2. List the modifiable risk factors in a woman considering breast reduction. 3. Use perioperative antibiotics in an evidence based fashion. 4. Identify factors that are associated with higher rates of perioperative complications. 5. Describe the risks and benefits of breast infiltration with epinephrine. 6. Describe the pros and cons of using drains following breast reduction. 7. Describe the incidence of invasive breast cancer in surgical specimens compared to autopsy specimens. 8. Identify common questionnaires that can be used to track short and long-term outcomes following breast reduction. 9. List at least three current practices that are now evolving and changing based on evidence based medicine. SUMMARY: This paper is designed to summarize key evidence based steps in the care of women undergoing reduction mammaplasty. In addition, the authors identify gaps between how plastic surgeons practice breast reduction and what the best evidence supports. The article was prepared to accompany practice-based assessment with ongoing surgical education for the Maintenance of Certification Program of the American Board of Plastic Surgery.
Authors: David A Daar; Jonathan M Bekisz; Michael V Chiodo; Evellyn M DeMitchell-Rodriguez; Pierre B Saadeh Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 2.326
Authors: Ajul Shah; Alexander Sun; Brandon Sumpio; Victor Zhu; Liane Philpotts; Alexander Au; Mark Melendez Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2016-06-20
Authors: P Niclas Broer; Nicholas Moellhoff; Thiha Aung; Antonio J Forte; Charlotte Topka; Dirk F Richter; Martin Colombo; Sammy Sinno; Andreas Kehrer; Florian Zeman; Rodney J Rohrich; Lukas Prantl; Paul I Heidekrueger Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2021-04-05 Impact factor: 2.326