Literature DB >> 24281195

Continents divided: Understanding differences between Europe and North America in acceptance of GM crops.

David Zilberman1, Scott Kaplan2, Eunice Kim2, Gal Hochman3, Gregory Graff4.   

Abstract

The differences between GM policies in the US and Europe have several causes. GM technology holds a home court advantage in the US and European chemical companies did not support its introduction. The technology did not seem to provide benefits to consumers, and the crops it applied to were not so significant in Europe. The technology was introduced during a time when the political influence of green parties in Europe was especially significant, and European trust of government capacity to enter food security issues was at its lowest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; GM crops; United States; biotechnology; economics; interest group; policy; political economy; regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24281195     DOI: 10.4161/gmcr.26981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.074


  11 in total

1.  The EU legislation on "GMOs" between nonsense and protectionism: An ongoing Schumpeterian chain of public choices.

Authors:  Giovanni Tagliabue
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 2.  Genetically modified phytase crops role in sustainable plant and animal nutrition and ecological development: a review.

Authors:  Chinreddy Subramanyam Reddy; Seong-Cheol Kim; Tanushri Kaul
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Motoko Araki
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 4.  Lessons learned from the introduction of genetically engineered crops: relevance to gene drive deployment in Africa.

Authors:  Hector Quemada
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.145

5.  Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Motoko Araki
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 6.  Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops.

Authors:  Jan M Lucht
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 7.  Plant Molecular Farming - Integration and Exploitation of Side Streams to Achieve Sustainable Biomanufacturing.

Authors:  Johannes F Buyel
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Non-safety Assessments of Genome-Edited Organisms: Should They be Included in Regulation?

Authors:  Bjørn Kåre Myskja; Anne Ingeborg Myhr
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Ectopic overexpression of a type-II DGAT (CeDGAT2-2) derived from oil-rich tuber of Cyperus esculentus enhances accumulation of oil and oleic acid in tobacco leaves.

Authors:  Yu Gao; Yan Sun; Huiling Gao; Ying Chen; Xiaoqing Wang; Jinai Xue; Xiaoyun Jia; Runzhi Li
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Investigating the status of transgenic crops in Iran in terms of cultivation, consumption, laws and rights in comparison with the world.

Authors:  Abolfazl Baghbani-Arani; Mona Poureisa; Hossein Alekajbaf; Rezvan Karami Borz-Abad; Khodadad Khodadadi-Dashtaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.