Literature DB >> 24280863

MD-PhD training: looking back and looking forward.

Ann C Bonham1.   

Abstract

MD-PhD programs provide rigorous, integrated training for physician-scientists, enabling them to frame scientific questions in unique ways and to apply clinical insight to fundamental science. Few would question the influential contributions of MD-PhD physician-scientists in advancing medical science. In this issue of Academic Medicine, Jeffe et al affirm high levels of excellence in educational outcomes from MD-PhD training programs at U.S. MD-granting medical schools, especially programs that receive funding from the NIH Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP). The author of this commentary observes that, in the face of current economic pressures, comprehensive, longitudinal national outcomes data from MSTP- and non-MSTP-funded MD-PhD programs will help verify the value provided by MD-PhD physician-scientists. She proposes that MD-PhD programs should better prepare the next generation of physician-scientists for future research environments, which will provide new technologies, venues, and modalities. These research environments will be more closely integrated within health care delivery systems, extend into diverse communities and regions, and employ complex technologies. MD-PhD physician-scientists also will train and gain expertise in broadening areas of research, such as health policy, health economics, clinical epidemiology, and medical informatics. Program leaders are ideally situated to foster innovative learning environments and methodologies. By sharing their innovations, they can help ensure production of a diverse MD-PhD physician-scientist workforce, prepared to engage in myriad research opportunities to meet patient and population needs in a new environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24280863     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  8 in total

1.  Ira Remsen, Osler, the Flexner Report, and the full-time plan.

Authors:  Charles S Bryan; Jonathan J Kopel; Mark Sorin
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-03-23

2.  Meeting the global need for physician-scientists: a Middle Eastern imperative.

Authors:  Lucman A Anwer; Ayesha N Anwer; Maryam Mahmood; Ahmed Abu-Zaid; Mohammad Abrar Shareef
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2014-10-30

3.  Clinician-scientist MB/PhD training in the UK: a nationwide survey of medical school policy.

Authors:  Ashton Barnett-Vanes; Guiyi Ho; Timothy M Cox
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The endangered clinician-investigator profession in Saudi Arabia: curricular attention is required.

Authors:  Ahmed Abu-Zaid
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

5.  Predictors of full-time faculty appointment among MD-PhD program graduates: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Dorothy A Andriole; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-05-13

6.  Clinician-Investigator Training and the Need to Pilot New Approaches to Recruiting and Retaining This Workforce.

Authors:  Alison K Hall; Sherry L Mills; P Kay Lund
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Transition Experiences in MD-PhD Programs.

Authors:  Devasmita Chakraverty; Donna B Jeffe; Robert H Tai
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  The clinician-scientist track: an approach addressing Australia's need for a pathway to train its future clinical academic workforce.

Authors:  Diann S Eley
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.