Literature DB >> 24280859

How do you deliver a good obstetrician? Outcome-based evaluation of medical education.

David A Asch1, Sean Nicholson, Sindhu K Srinivas, Jeph Herrin, Andrew J Epstein.   

Abstract

The goal of medical education is the production of a workforce capable of improving the health and health care of patients and populations, but it is hard to use a goal that lofty, that broad, and that distant as a standard against which to judge the success of schools or training programs or particular elements within them. For that reason, the evaluation of medical education often focuses on elements of its structure and process, or on the assessment of competencies that could be considered intermediate outcomes. These measures are more practical because they are easier to collect, and they are valuable when they reflect activities in important positions along the pathway to clinical outcomes. But they are all substitutes for measuring whether educational efforts produce doctors who take good care of patients.The authors argue that the evaluation of medical education can become more closely tethered to the clinical outcomes medical education aims to achieve. They focus on a specific clinical outcome-maternal complications of obstetrical delivery-and show how examining various observable elements of physicians' training and experience helps reveal which of those elements lead to better outcomes. Does it matter where obstetricians trained? Does it matter how much experience they have? Does it matter how good they were to start? Each of these questions reflects a component of the production of a good obstetrician and, most important, defines a good obstetrician as one whose patients in the end do well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24280859     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  22 in total

1.  Health Literacy: An Educationally Sensitive Patient Outcome.

Authors:  H Shonna Yin; Melanie Jay; Leslie Maness; Sondra Zabar; Adina Kalet
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Residency redesign: much to do.

Authors:  M Douglas Jones; Gail A McGuinness
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-12

3.  Attitudes of Pulmonary and Critical Care Training Program Directors toward Quality Improvement Education.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Laura C Feemster; Carolyn M Fruci; Robert C Hyzy; Adrienne P Savant; Jonathan M Siner; Curtis H Weiss; Bela Patel
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-04

4.  How Do Thresholds of Principle and Preference Influence Surgeon Assessments of Learner Performance?

Authors:  Tavis Apramian; Sayra Cristancho; Alp Sener; Lorelei Lingard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  "Staying in the Game": How Procedural Variation Shapes Competence Judgments in Surgical Education.

Authors:  Tavis Apramian; Sayra Cristancho; Chris Watling; Michael Ott; Lorelei Lingard
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  AN OUTCOMES-BASED APPROACH ACROSS THE MEDICAL EDUCATION CONTINUUM.

Authors:  Mark E Rosenberg
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2018

7.  Value and limits of experience.

Authors:  Francine Lemire
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Does One Size Truly Fit All? The COUPE Undergraduate Perspective on Competency-Based Medical Education in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Natasja Menezes; Raed Hawa; Ron Oswald; Elliott Kyung Lee
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.356

9.  Factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes among obstetrics trainees.

Authors:  Catherine E Aiken; Abigail R Aiken; Hannah Park; Jeremy C Brockelsby; Andrew Prentice
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  The association between residency training and internists' ability to practice conservatively.

Authors:  Brenda E Sirovich; Rebecca S Lipner; Mary Johnston; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.