Literature DB >> 24278921

Impact of implantoplasty on strength of the implant-abutment complex.

Hsun-Liang Chan, Won-Suck Oh, Hwei Sze Ong, Jia-Hui Fu, Marius Steigmann, Marianella Sierraalta, Hom-Lay Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Implantoplasty, a procedure that is done to smooth contaminated implant surfaces, has been used in the treatment of peri-implantitis. It reduces the implant diameter, which might compromise the implant's strength. This in vitro study was designed to evaluate the effect of implantoplasty on implant strength.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two tapered implants were used; half were 3.75 mm in diameter (narrow) and the other half were 4.7 mm in diameter (wide). All implants were connected to 20-degree angled abutments. The apical half of each implant was embedded in acrylic resin. Eight 3.75-mm- and eight 4.7-mm-diameter implants were randomly assigned to receive implantoplasty. The remaining implants did not receive implantoplasty (control group). Implantoplasty was performed with a series of diamond and polishing burs. The specimens were then loaded 30 degrees off-axis in a universal testing machine until fracture failure occurred. Bending and fracture strength values were recorded and analyzed statistically (α = .05). The fractured surfaces were evaluated under a scanning electron microscope.
RESULTS: All narrow implants failed by fracture at the implant platform. The mean bending strength of narrow implants was statistically significantly reduced by implantoplasty (511.4 ± 55.9 N versus 613.9 ± 42.8 N). Implantoplasty did not affect the strength of wide implants; fracture failures occurred at the abutment screw. The fracture mode was ductile and the crack growth was oblique in direction, indicating complex stress distribution and concentration under loading.
CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, implantoplasty appeared to weaken the strength of narrower implants. Therefore, this procedure should be performed with caution on narrower, freestanding implants that are subject to greater occlusal force (eg, posterior regions). Validation of these results is needed for different implant systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24278921     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

1.  The influence of implantoplasty on the diameter, chemical surface composition, and biocompatibility of titanium implants.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Gordon John; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Implant fracture under dynamic fatigue loading: influence of embedded angle and depth of implant.

Authors:  Hiroaki Suzuki; Yoshiaki Hata; Fumihiko Watanabe
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Effect of crown to implant ratio and implantoplasty on the fracture resistance of narrow dental implants with marginal bone loss: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Bruno Leitão-Almeida; Octavi Camps-Font; André Correia; Javier Mir-Mari; Rui Figueiredo; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Does implantoplasty affect the failure strength of narrow and regular diameter implants? A laboratory study.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Flemming Isidor; Per Vult von Steyern; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series.

Authors:  Orlando Martins; Philipp Sahrmann; João Ramos; Francisco Caramelo; Sérgio Matos; Isabel Poiares Baptista
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.