| Literature DB >> 24278540 |
Do Young Kwon1, Sun Ju Kim, Ju Won Lee, Young Chul Kim.
Abstract
The ability of 80% ethanol extracts from five medicinal plants, Aralia continentalis, Paeonia suffruticosa, Magnolia denudata, Anemarrhena asphodeloides, and Schizonepeta tenuifolia, to neutralize hydroxyl radical, peroxyl radical and peroxynitrite was examined using the total oxyradical scavenging capacity (TOSC) assay. Peroxyl radical was generated from thermal homolysis of 2,2'-azobis (2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (ABAP) ; hydroxyl radical by an iron-ascorbate Fenton reaction; peroxynitrite by spontaneous decomposition of 3-morpholinosydnonimine N-ethylcarbamide (SIN-1) . The oxidants generated react with α-keto-γ-methiolbutyric acid (KMBA) to yield ethylene, and the TOSC of the substances tested is quantified from their ability to inhibit ethylene formation. Extracts from P. suffruticosa, M. denudata,and S. tenuifolia were determined to be potent peroxyl radical scavenging agents with a specific TOSC (sTOSC) being at least six-fold greater than that of glutathione (GSH) . These three plants also showed sTOSCs toward peroxynitrite markedly greater than sTOSC of GSH, however, only P. suffruticosa revealed a significant hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity. Seven major active constituents isolated from P. suffruticosa, quercetin, (+) -catechin, methyl gallate, gallic acid, benzoic acid, benzoyl paeoniflorin and paeoniflorin, were determined for their antioxidant potential toward peroxynitrite, peroxyl and hydroxyl radicals. Quercetin, (+) -catechin, methyl gallate, and gallic acid exhibited sTOSCs 40~85 times greater than sTOSC of GSH. These four components also showed a peroxynitrite scavenging capacity higher than at least 10-fold of GSH. For antioxidant activity against hydroxyl radical, methyl gallate was greatest followed by gallic acid and quercetin. Further studies need to be conducted to substantiate the significance of scavenging a specific oxidant in the prevention of cellular injury and disease states caused by the reactive free radical species.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Hydroxyl radical; Peroxyl radical; Peroxynitrite; Reactive oxygen species (ROS); Total oxyradical scavenging capacity (TOSC)
Year: 2010 PMID: 24278540 PMCID: PMC3834501 DOI: 10.5487/TR.2010.26.4.321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Res ISSN: 1976-8257
Fig. 1.Time-course of ethylene generation from KMBA oxidation by peroxyl radical (A) hydroxyl radical (B) and peroxynitrite (C) in the presence of different concentrations of P.suffruticosa. Each insert shows linear regression plot for the experimental TOSC values vs concentrations of P. suffruticosa.
Linear regression slopes and intercepts for the TOSC values vs concentrations of plant extracts
| Peroxyl radical | Hydroxyl radical | Peroxynitrite | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Y-int | Slope | R2 | Y-int | Slope | R2 | Y-int | Slope | R2 | |
|
| |||||||||
| GSH | 4.43 | 2.00 | 0.970 | 3.90 | 0.50 | 0.986 | 1.34 | 0.45 | 0.974 |
| 3.73 | 13.94 | 0.963 | N.D. | 4.04 | 15.97 | 0.988 | |||
| A. | 0.83 | 2.41 | 0.950 | N.E. | 0.29 | 1.02 | 0.990 | ||
| P. | 1.20 | 5.99 | 0.986 | 1.46 | 1.38 | 0.997 | 3.44 | 1.33 | 0.983 |
| 0.33 | 7.07 | 0.999 | N.E. | 0.32 | 4.83 | 0.987 | |||
| A. | −0.21 | 3.17 | 0.999 | N.E. | 0.91 | 0.56 | 0.987 | ||
| 3.81 | 11.81 | 0.978 | N.E. | 0.33 | 2.00 | 0.999 | |||
The slope and intercept of the regression line were calculated from linear portion of the curve for the experimental TOSC values toward peroxyl radical, hydroxyl radical, and peroxynitrite vs the amounts of the plant extract used. N.D.: Not Determined. N.E.: Not Effective.
sTOSC (per μg) and rTOSC of five plant extracts toward peroxyl radical, hydroxyl radical, and peroxynitrite
| Peroxyl radical | Hydroxyl radical | Peroxynitrite | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| sTOSC | rTOSC | sTOSC | rTOSC | sTOSC | rTOSC | ||
|
| |||||||
| GSH | 2.00 | 1 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.45 | 1 | |
| 13.94 | 6.97 | N.D. | 15.97 | 35.49 | |||
| 2.41 | 1.21 | N.E. | 1.02 | 2.27 | |||
| 5.99 | 3.00 | 1.38 | 2.76 | 1.33 | 2.96 | ||
| 7.07 | 3.54 | N.E. | 4.83 | 10.73 | |||
| 3.17 | 1.59 | N.E. | 0.56 | 1.24 | |||
| 11.81 | 5.91 | N.E. | 2.00 | 4.44 | |||
N.D.: Not Determined. N.E.: Not Effective
Linear regression slopes and intercepts for the TOSC values vs concentrations of the isolated components from P. suffruticosa
| Peroxyl radical | Hydroxyl radical | Peroxynitrite | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Y-int | Slope | R2 | Y-int | Slope | R2 | Y-int | Slope | R2 | |
|
| |||||||||
| GSH | 4.43 | 2.00 | 0.970 | 3.90 | 0.50 | 0.986 | 1.34 | 0.45 | 0.974 |
| Ascorbic acid | 3.73 | 13.94 | 0.963 | N.D. | 4.04 | 15.97 | 0.988 | ||
| Benzoic acid | N.E. | 5.33 | 1.00 | 0.913 | 2.82 | 0.43 | 0.874 | ||
| Benzoyl paeoniflorin | N.E. | N.E. | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.999 | ||||
| (+) -Catechin | 0.47 | 118.70 | 0.994 | 1.98 | 0.81 | 0.980 | 4.23 | 13.25 | 0.953 |
| Gallic acid | 0.48 | 79.05 | 0.986 | 0.49 | 1.30 | 0.999 | −0.83 | 28.85 | 0.997 |
| Methyl gallate | 0.82 | 128.90 | 0.998 | 3.09 | 7.11 | 0.977 | 7.26 | 16.17 | 0.911 |
| Paeoniflorin | 1.55 | 1.25 | 0.994 | N.E. | −0.47 | 1.95 | 0.993 | ||
| Quercetin | −0.41 | 169.90 | 0.997 | 1.04 | 1.09 | 0.973 | 3.26 | 5.99 | 0.965 |
The slope and intercept of the regression line were calculated from linear portion of the curve for the experimental TOSC values toward peroxyl radical, hydroxyl radical, and peroxynitrite vs the concentrations of the isolated component used. N.D.: Not Determined. N.E.: Not Effective.
sTOSC and rTOSC of the isolated components from P. suffruticosa toward peroxyl radical, hydroxyl radical and peroxynitrite
| Peroxyl radical | Hydroxyl radical | Peroxynitrite | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| sTOSC | rTOSC | sTOSC | rTOSC | sTOSC | rTOSC | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| (per μg) | (per μg) | (per μg) | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
| GSH | 2.00 | 1 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.45 | 1 | |||
| Ascorbic acid | 13.94 | 6.97 | N.D. | 15.97 | 35.49 | ||||
| Benzoic acid | N.E. | 1.00 | 2.00 | 0.43 | 0.96 | ||||
| Benzoyl paeoniflorin | N.E. | N.E. | 0.38 | 0.84 | |||||
| (+) -Catechin | 118.70 | 59.35 | 0.81 | 1.62 | 13.25 | 29.44 | |||
| Gallic acid | 79.05 | 39.53 | 1.30 | 2.60 | 28.85 | 64.11 | |||
| Methyl gallate | 128.90 | 64.45 | 7.11 | 14.22 | 16.17 | 35.93 | |||
| Paeoniflorin | 1.25 | 0.63 | N.E. | 1.95 | 4.33 | ||||
| Quercetin | 169.90 | 84.95 | 1.09 | 2.18 | 5.99 | 13.31 | |||
N.D.: Not Determined. N.E.: Not Effective.