Literature DB >> 24276993

Specificity of male response to multicomponent pheromones in noctuid mothsTrichoplusia ni andPseudoplusia includens.

C E Linn1, A Hammond, J Du, W L Roelofs.   

Abstract

The response of male cabbage looper (CL) and soybean iooper (SBL) moths was observed in the flight tunnel and measured in field tests to the six-component CL pheromone, the five-component SBL pheromone, and toZ7-12: OAc, the major component common to each pheromone. In both the flight tunnel and the field, male CL exhibited significantly greater levels of response to their six-component blend than toZ7-12: OAc alone. A low level of cross-attraction of male CL to the SBL pheromone was observed in both the flight tunnel and the field, but it was quantitatively and qualitatively similar to their response toZ7-12: OAc alone. Thus the minor components of the SBL blend did not appear to disrupt the flight behavior of male CL. With respect to SBL, in the flight tunnel males also exhibited a greater level of response to the five-component blend compared toZ7-12: OAc, but in the field their response was not significantly different to either treatment. There was also a low level of cross-attraction of male SBL to the CL blend, but this appeared to involve a significant arrestment effect on the upwind flight of males, as well as a difference in male sensitivity to the blend of components compared withZ7-12: OAc alone. The observed arrestment effect may have been due to male perception of one or more minor components of the CL pheromone. The results show that the multicomponent pheromones of these species function effectively as specific mating signals and that discrimination of odor quality by male moths can occur as the result of minor components affecting male sensitivity or their upwind flight response to the pheromone.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 24276993     DOI: 10.1007/BF01022530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  5 in total

1.  Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics.

Authors:  T A RYAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Redundancy in a chemical signal: Behavioral responses of maleTrichoplusia ni to a 6-Component sex pheromone blend.

Authors:  C E Linn; L B Bjostad; J W Du; W L Roelofs
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Identification of new sex pheromone components inTrichoplusia ni, predicted from biosynthetic precursors.

Authors:  L B Bjostad; C E Linn; J W Du; W L Roelofs
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Male moth sensitivity to multicomponent pheromones: Critical role of female-released blend in determining the functional role of components and active space of the pheromone.

Authors:  C E Linn; M G Campbell; W L Roelofs
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Identification of unique pheromone components for soybean looper mothPseudoplusia includens.

Authors:  C E Linn; J Du; A Hammond; W L Roelofs
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.626

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Attraction ofCacoecimorpha pronubana male moths to synthetic sex pheromone blends in the wind tunnel.

Authors:  P Witzgall
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Sex pheromone evidence for two distinct taxa withinGraphania mutans (Walker).

Authors:  B Frérot; S P Foster
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Role of sex pheromone components in behavioral reproductive isolation betweenAutographa gamma (L.) and eitherTrichoplusia ni (Hübner) ORChrysodeixis chalcites (Esp.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Plusiinae).

Authors:  M Mazor; E Dunkelblum
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Attractiveness of a four-component pheromone blend to male navel orangeworm moths.

Authors:  Hiroo Kanno; L P S Kuenen; Kimberly A Klingler; Jocelyn G Millar; Ring T Cardé
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Use of paired and single traps to assess perception and discrimination of sex pheromone mixtures in the field byTrichoplusia ni (Hübner).

Authors:  M S Mayer; J R McLaughlin; E R Mitchell
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  A mutation in pheromonal communication system of cabbage looper moth,Trichoplusia ni.

Authors:  K F Haynes; R E Hunt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Comparative analysis of sex-pheromone-response antagonists in three races of European corn borer.

Authors:  T J Glover; N Perez; W L Roelofs
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Extracting Social Information from Chemosensory Cues: Consideration of Several Scenarios and Their Functional Implications.

Authors:  Yoram Ben-Shaul
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.