Literature DB >> 24318397

Redundancy in a chemical signal: Behavioral responses of maleTrichoplusia ni to a 6-Component sex pheromone blend.

C E Linn1, L B Bjostad, J W Du, W L Roelofs.   

Abstract

The flight response of maleTrichoplusia ni was observed in a flight tunnel to a sex pheromone blend composed of six components:Z7-12∶Ac, 12∶Ac,Z5-12∶Ac, 11-12∶Ac,Z7-14∶Ac, and Z9-14∶Ac. The number of males reaching a 3000-μg source of this blend was > 95%, equal to that observed to female glands and significantly greater than with the previously identified two-component blend (Z7-12∶Ac + 12∶Ac). In subtraction tests, all five-component blends, with the exception of the blend lacking the primary componentZ7-12∶Ac, and several four-component blends elicited similar peak levels of upwind flight, source contacts, and hairpencil displays to that observed with the six-component blend. We characterize the substitution of certain minor components for one another as a form of redundancy in the chemical signal and suggest that it contributes to response specificity and signal recognition in males. The results also support the concept that the full blend of components acts as a unit to influence male behavior at all phases of the response. Individual minor components were not responsible for eliciting specific behaviors in the sequence.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 24318397     DOI: 10.1007/BF00988431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  10 in total

1.  Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics.

Authors:  T A RYAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Morphological correlates of differences in pheromone sensitivity in insect sensilla.

Authors:  R J O'connell; A J Grant; M S Mayer; R W Mankin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Behavioral responses of maleHeliothis virescens in a sustained-flight tunnel to combinations of seven compounds identified from female sex pheromone glands.

Authors:  R S Vetter; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  A high-efficiency collection device for quantifying sex pheromone volatilized from female glands and synthetic sources.

Authors:  T C Baker; L K Gaston; M M Pope; L P Kuenen; R S Vetter
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Composition, quantification, and periodicity of sex pheromone gland volatiles from individualHeliothis virescens females.

Authors:  M M Pope; L K Gaston; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Structure-activity relationships in sex attractants for north American noctuid moths.

Authors:  W Steck; E W Underhill; M D Chisholm
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Identification of new sex pheromone components inTrichoplusia ni, predicted from biosynthetic precursors.

Authors:  L B Bjostad; C E Linn; J W Du; W L Roelofs
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Trace chemicals: the essence of sexual communication systems in heliothis species.

Authors:  J A Klun; J R Plimmer; B A Bierl-Leonhardt; A N Sparks; O L Chapman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sex Pheromone Biosynthesis in Trichoplusia ni: Key Steps Involve Delta-11 Desaturation and Chain-Shortening.

Authors:  L B Bjostad; W L Roelofs
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Olfactory receptor responses to sex pheromone components in the redbanded leafroller moth.

Authors:  R J O'Connell
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 4.086

  10 in total
  34 in total

1.  Temporal analysis of adaptation in moth (Trichoplusia ni) pheromone receptor neurons.

Authors:  P F Borroni; R J O'Connell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Attraction ofCacoecimorpha pronubana male moths to synthetic sex pheromone blends in the wind tunnel.

Authors:  P Witzgall
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Insect olfactory receptor responses to components of pheromone blends.

Authors:  R J O'Connell; J T Beauchamp; A J Grant
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Interactions between components of the aggregation pheromone during chemotaxis by the bark beetleIps paraconfusus.

Authors:  R P Akers; H K Preisler; D L Wood
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  New pheromone components of the grapevine moth Lobesia botrana.

Authors:  Peter Witzgall; Marco Tasin; Hans-Ruedi Buser; Gertrud Wegner-Kiss; Vicente S Marco Mancebón; Claudio Ioriatti; Anna-Carin Bäckman; Marie Bengtsson; Lutz Lehmann; Wittko Francke
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-12-18       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Chemical communication in invertebrates.

Authors:  R J O'Connell
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1986-03-15

7.  Use of paired and single traps to assess perception and discrimination of sex pheromone mixtures in the field byTrichoplusia ni (Hübner).

Authors:  M S Mayer; J R McLaughlin; E R Mitchell
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Synergism of an insect sex pheromone specialist neuron: Implications for component identification and receptor interactions.

Authors:  M S Mayer; R E Doolittle
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Optical isomers of 3,13-dimethylheptadecane: Sex pheromone components of the western false hemlock looper,Nepytia freemani (Lepidoptera: Geometridae).

Authors:  G G Skip King; R Gries; G Gries; K N Slessor
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Altered olfactory receptor neuron responsiveness is correlated with a shift in behavioral response in an evolved colony of the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni.

Authors:  Michael J Domingue; Kenneth F Haynes; Julie L Todd; Thomas C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.