Literature DB >> 24276132

Responses of male codling moths (Laspeyresia pomonella) to codlemone and other alcohols in a wind tunnel.

R Preiss1, E Priesner.   

Abstract

The primary pheromone (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol (I, codle-mone), 11 further alcohols, and binary blends of both were evaluated for attractiveness as defined by the percentage ofL. pomonella males showing oriented upwind flight terminated by landing at the source within 10 min after release. Sources of I were attractive from 10(-5) μg to 10(1) μg, with approx. 70% males responding at 10(-3)-10(-1) μg. Most other alcohols also showed attractiveness, but the dose-response curves differed greatly with respect to the range of effective lure doses as well as the maximum response level reached at any dose. (E,E)-7,9-Undecadien-1-ol (III) revealed a dose-response curve similar in shape to I but shifted towards higher concentrations. (E,E)-8,10-Tridecadien-1-ol (II) and (E)-8,10-undecadien-1-ol (IV) exhibited threshold values of 10(-5) μg (same as for I) and were effective over, respectively, seven and nine decades of source load, but they did not reach a response level of 40% at any test amount. (E)-9,11-Dodecadien-1-ol (VI) and the monoenes (E)-8-, (E)-10-, and (Z)-10-dodecen-1-ol (VIII-X) showed weak attractivity restricted to one to three test doses. Upwind approaches that broke off a few centimeters from the source were rarely seen in tests with I but frequently occurred with some of the analogs. When combined with 10(-3) μg of I, all alcohol analogs showed "inhibitory" properties, although the amounts required to obtain a significant lowering of response differed by up to 10(5)-fold. This amount was the lowest (10(-4) μg) for the positional isomer VI, and the highest (10(1) μg) for undecan-1-ol (XI) and dodecan-1-ol (XII). With some mixtures, the presence of the inhibitor appeared to cause an alteration in landing behavior. No synergistic effects were seen in these tests. The results are briefly considered with respect to the sensory perception of the test stimuli and the involvement of minor components in the female pheromone blend.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 24276132     DOI: 10.1007/BF01018774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  4 in total

1.  Sex attractant inhibitors of the codling moth Laspeyresia pomonella L.

Authors:  H Arn; C Schwarz; H Limacher; E Mani
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1974-10-15

2.  Codling moth sex attractant--field trials with geometrical isomers.

Authors:  W L Roelofs; R J Bartell; A S Hill; R T Cardé; L H Waters
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Sex attractant of the codling moth: characterization with electroantennogram technique.

Authors:  W Roelofs; A Comeau; A Hill; G Milicevic
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sex Pheromones: (E,E)-8,10-Dodecadien-1-ol in the Codling Moth.

Authors:  M Beroza; B A Bierl; H R Moffitt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Modeling and regression analysis of semiochemical dose-response curves of insect antennal reception and behavior.

Authors:  John A Byers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  European corn borer sex pheromone : Inhibition and elicitation of behavioral response by analogs.

Authors:  M Schwarz; J A Klun; E C Uebel
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Wind-tunnel study on attraction inhibitor in maleColeophora laricella Hbn. (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae).

Authors:  P Witzgall; E Priesner
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Pheromone response inhibitors of the corn stalk borer Sesamia nonagrioides. Biological evaluation and toxicology.

Authors:  M Riba; A Sans; P Bau; G Grolleau; M Renou; A Guerrero
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Behavior of processionary males (Thaumetopoea pityocampa) induced by sex pheromone and analogs in a wind tunnel.

Authors:  C Quero; F Camps; A Guerrero
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Host plant volatiles synergize response to sex pheromone in codling moth, Cydia pomonella.

Authors:  Zhihua Yang; Marie Bengtsson; Peter Witzgall
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Behavioral responses ofSpodoptera littoralis males to sex pheromone components and virgin females in wind tunnel.

Authors:  C Quero; P Lucas; M Renou; A Guerrero
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Electrophysiological and field activity of halogenated analogs of (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol, the main pheromone component, in codling moth (Cydia pomonella L.).

Authors:  P Lucas; M Renou; F Tellier; A Hammoud; H Audemard; C Descoins
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Response of male codling moths (Cydia pomonella) to components of conspecific female sex pheromone glands in flight tunnel tests.

Authors:  L M McDonough; H G Davis; P S Chapman; C L Smithhisler
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.626

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.